Why are there so many Trump supporters on RIU?

[Sir Napsalot]

OK. Just keep in mind which side has all the guns.

That's a common misconception

 

[Fogdog]

"Classical Liberals" is a group that is quickly growing due to being displaced by extreme ideologies on the left. But of course, in true ultra-left fashion, they are labelled as Trumptards or Nazis simply because they do not conform to the group-think. As this continues, it accelerates the mass exodus of independent thinkers from the left and it is creating a new "center". Watch for it.

You are making up a new term. I have no idea what a "classical liberal" is.

Can you name some politicians who you think are Classical Liberals

 

[NaturalFarmer]

That's a common misconception

As we found out in Vegas and on the DC softball field. Little pussies like those fucks?

 

[bundee1]

I have no idea what any of this is about, but let's just say I have no quarrel with you. I am not a Trump supporter. I am a right-leaning Canadian who is concerned about the polarization of political opinion in the world. The left seems to be entering into a whole new realm of authoritarianism. Even being a centerist and/or disagreeing with the extreme leftist ideals gets people labelled Nazis or at least insulted or accused of something.

Be very careful down there in the States. It doesn't look like this is going to end well.

Wow two native American/Japanese pro trump mamahuevos on this site? What are the odds?

 

[Sour Wreck]

Somewhere around 50% of your fellow Americans are "fascists"?!

This is where civil discourse breaks down. Throwing around terms that most people don't even understand as a way to vilify those who don't agree with your group ideals.

This simply will not work. The left's refusal to even have a civil discussion is something that will need to change if any progress is to be made. You are interested in progress, right?

no, it's about 38%...

fuck civil discourse.

i am done talking...

 

[bundee1]

That's cute the right are sheep you must be joking. The left is all about group think that's their platform and all they have.

Equal rights, pay equality, the preservation of our democracy so totally groupthink.
Moron.

 

[Sour Wreck]

OK. Just keep in mind which side has all the guns.

we understand its the white supremacists...

lots of liberals are armed too, we just don't own 38 guns...

 

[Sour Wreck]

Doesn't surprise me at all. I know quite a few Liberals with guns who hunt and shoot target/trap. However, they are Classical Liberals who don't buy into the ultra-left group-think and have no intention of turning their guns on Conservatives simply due to a different opinion on a few issues.

Your intent to kill your fellow Americans is noteworthy.

he is not alone

 

[bundee1]

1) Cultural Marxism (Frankfurt School)

2) Equity (enforced equal outcomes)

3) Curtailment of freedom of thought/expression

Classical Liberals reject all of the above, and are therefore incompatible with the current state of the global ultra-left. Any attempt to undermine this argument necessarily entails massive amounts of cognitive dissonance.

3) you all think calling people the n word is freedom of speech. Moron.

 

[cogitech]

You are making up a new term. I have no idea what a "classical liberal" is.

Can you name some politicians who you think are Classical Liberals

Yep. I just made it up. I went back in time and whispered in some ears.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism

 

[Fogdog]

Yep. I just made it up. I went back in time and whispered in some ears.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism

What currently serving US Congress politicians do you consider "classical liberal"?

 

[schuylaar]

Weren't the Nazi Socialist? Maybe he was trying to gain some Bernie Bros? Just don't know. Ive step on my scrotum a few times saying stupid shit. Trump didn't mean that and you know it. FIts your narrative though.

They were Nationalist.

 

[Jimdamick]

Again you people always find an angle for assumptions and polarisation despite preaching all that rah rah "don't assume my.." bullshit.

"You people"?
W'ah the fuck?
All I asked was if you voted.
You didn't, right?
OK, end of story, but I don't understand why you are interested in politics, and don't vote.
Just doesn't make any sense too me.

 

[bundee1]

"You people"?
W'ah the fuck?
All I asked was if you voted.
You didn't, right?
OK, end of story, but I don't understand why you are interested in politics, and don't vote.
Just doesn't make any sense too me.

He cant even think about the conflict or else he'd have a meltdown.

 

[zeddd]

"You people"?
W'ah the fuck?
All I asked was if you voted.
You didn't, right?
OK, end of story, but I don't understand why you are interested in politics, and don't vote.
Just doesn't make any sense too me.

Hey Jim I don’t vote but I am political, I live in a fucking monarchy ruled by an evil witch, voting is pointless, the witch tells the American poodles ( our politicians) what to do. Loving the chav wedding our country’s share, so low class, jerry springer types

 

[cogitech]

What currently serving US Congress politicians do you consider "classical liberal"?

Ron Paul (not current, but certainly significant) is the only name that comes to mind off the top of my head, but as a Canadian I am not very familiar with US Congress. Basically any of them that call themselves Libertarian have heavy classical Liberal ideals. This is considerably different than "social" Liberalism.

 

[Fogdog]

1) Cultural Marxism (Frankfurt School)

2) Equity (enforced equal outcomes)

3) Curtailment of freedom of thought/expression

Classical Liberals reject all of the above, and are therefore incompatible with the current state of the global ultra-left. Any attempt to undermine this argument necessarily entails massive amounts of cognitive dissonance.

1) Cultural Marxism is a chimera made up by Breitbart and the alt.right.
2) As long as we don't have equal opportunity then there must be enforcement of civil rights laws.
3) We have freedom of thought and expression. Both sides are free from government intrusion into what can or can't be said under the first amendment. People like Milo and Spencer are free to say what they want. Other people are free to protest their presence on campuses. Their freedom to speak doesn't mean that protesters can't exercise their freedom to protest and shut them up.

 

[bundee1]

Ron Paul (not current, but certainly significant) is the only name that comes to mind off the top of my head, but as a Canadian I am not very familiar with US Congress. Basically any of them that call themselves Libertarian have heavy classical Liberal ideals. This is considerably different than "social" Liberalism.

You mean white guys like Rob Roy? Or other white guys who think libertarian means saying the n word with impunity.

 

[schuylaar]

"Classical Liberals" is a group that is quickly growing due to being displaced by extreme ideologies on the left. But of course, in true ultra-left fashion, they are labelled as Trumptards or Nazis simply because they do not conform to the group-think. As this continues, it accelerates the mass exodus of independent thinkers from the left and it is creating a new "center". Watch for it.

Classic liberal is aka Establishment Democrat similar to that of a moderate republican aka Establishment Republican.

The two are almost interchangeable.

Democratic Socialism ie Denmark is far left.

Nationalism ie Nazi is far right.

 

[Fogdog]

Ron Paul (not current, but certainly significant) is the only name that comes to mind off the top of my head, but as a Canadian I am not very familiar with US Congress. Basically any of them that call themselves Libertarian have heavy classical Liberal ideals. This is considerably different than "social" Liberalism.

Oh yes, clearly not a liberal.

The guy is as racist as can be.

I'm beginning to get where you are coming from.

• Small government with limited roles - National defense being one of them. Justice system too. What about education system, national or private?
• Unregulated capitalism
• No social programs like universal healthcare(?) or programs to keep people out of poverty or starving to death
• No such thing as racism or racial inequality so civil rights laws are unnecessary

Am I guessing right?