There is such a thing as a group of people who are called CEO and the ones I'm talking about make huge salaries. Their performance or more rightly their company's performance can be tracked, their pay can be compared to performance and we can learn some surprising things with data analysis such as this.
In a study that I cited earlier (and am reposting the link
here), the researchers found no relationship between the amount in a CEO's pay package and their performance.
I'm not making a morality case out of this. That study shows that a typical Board of Directors has poor ability to choose good leadership. They might as well "splatter paint on a wall" to choose the new CEO. Whatever it is they are doing isn't working.
Couple that knowledge with the one where on average, CEO's are making 300 - 400 times what an unskilled worker makes. In no other country is there such a large pay gap. Not even close. On one hand, we know that CEO pay doesn't relate to a company's performance and on the other hand we know that the pay gap between CEO's and workers in the US is huge and peculiar to the US. Put the two together and we can see that money is being wasted on an inefficient system for picking CEOs. That money is going into CEO's pockets. So this is where the sense of outrage about US CEO pay begins.