Ok i will admit that, for I do understand what u mean by "Being useful despite the stress is different then being useful because of the stress".
You admit you're wrong? About what exactly, explain the mistake you've been making to show you've learned something. That is a challenge because I don't get the sense that you do understand.
But like I said it's when the plant heals from whatever stress that it produce the good stuff. So I'm still talking about the technique use to trick the plant into making more tichromes.
This is why I doubt that you understand because you're still making unsubstantiated claims without backing them up & seem to expect us to take that seriously when we've all been saying since page 1 that these myths have never passed any sort of objective test.
If it's not true or true was the point of the thread. All ii wa trying to know was if there are actually was of training plant that's not so grade A genetics to produce more tichromes?
We all know you've been asking that & trying to find some justification, some crack to validate your unjustified belief that these myths have value. Which is what I'm trying to point out to you, that someone said exactly what you finally acknowlged somewhere between page 30-35, that beginners are much better off focusing on proven ways to increase yield & potency by creating a stress free environment.
You said then that if people had said that off the bat without jumping down your throat you would have listened.
When I proved by going back to replies from page 1, you ignored the point I was making to fixated of your point about the stress from topping/healing later boosting potency. That is incredibly disrespectful to ignore a valid point to fixate on an irrelevant fact (that you later acknowledge you were wrong about). You keep saying people don't listen, no one respects you & other nonsense when it's clear you are not communicating. You are not listening. You are being disrespectful.
So, back to gibberish for you. Saying gobbledy gobbledy blup blup snugglefoot has just as much value as trying to explain a basic concept.
Prove me wrong by refuting my point about how someone pointed out on page one that a stress free enviro is the best but you've ignored it because you'd rather argue minutia or semantics instead of learning something & acknowledging you were wrong.