Anon618
Well-Known Member
Back under my rock..Who’s the special guest on infowars today
Back under my rock..Who’s the special guest on infowars today
There is nothing at stake for big oil, there is nothing of scale to replace it atm. Research funding could end any moment. So you're way off base.No. Big oil is literally the the single largest private interest group in the world. Petroleum is still by far the world's most traded commodity by volume, weight and value. You couldn't be more wrong.
This theory was advanced by the late Dr William Gray at the Colorado State University Atmospheric Sciences Department. He was the original author of the yearly hurricane forecast so his influence was substantial. He argued strongly that climate change was due to solar cycles and so his students did a great deal of work validating this thesis.I'm a member of a geological and fossils group on Facebook and many of them also believe climate change in the "al gore" terms is a lie. Yes there is climate change. Yes we are damaging the world. However the sun has a cycle, its understood, and we are entering a cold cycle... and before each cold cycle it get hotter.
Basically what I hear is that we do need to take better care of our environment, and we need to continue to put money into tech to clean the oceans as we are doing, however the sun is 99+ % of climate change and humans are 1-%
This is raw drivel.The collective 'we' are so dumbed down (by those with a control agenda) we don't have a clue as to what is going on either on terra firma, or in space.
The FACT is our portion of the galaxy is not static, it moves, and has moved into a warmer part of the galaxy
They know this, just as they knew there was NOTHING wrong with cannabis and hemp when they banned it. IF they really cared about the planet they would force those responsible for destroying the ecosystem by strip mining forests and using heavy phosphate for commercial growing to stop: that runoff is destroying the water ways and ocean ecosystms. Why should WE pay another useless tax? Oh I know, I know, to line their pockets
More drivel. Those with the most at stake are the major shareholders of coal fired power utilities.Mann made hockey stick graphs and Cooked fake consensus is still driving the vehicle after all these years of countless other climategate type scenarios.
The ones who have the most at stake are the government funded researchers.
Funny you should mention him. The article does an excellent job of tying climate change denial to deeper components of the Conservative psyche.Cool conspiracy
Anyone other than David duke share it?
What is at the ready right now at this moment to knock oil, voal and nuclear out this year? Or any one of them individually?More drivel. Those with the most at stake are the major shareholders of coal fired power utilities.
Small wonder their conclusions are so self serving.
Do you own stock in Duke Energy? If so, I'd sell.
So switch the argument to personal attacks when you've lost the debate.@abandonconflict should prolly change his user name to something more fitting. Like PCprinciple or something. Dude your so aggro, do you need a spotter? Relax dude this is a pot growing forum.
If your saying those cycles are well understood, arnt we saying the same thing? Hahah jesus christ dude you need to relax! Maybe get on some meds or something you seem unbalanced
Cool, I'm not personally or emotionally invested in any one way or another. I def know we are fucking the planet up and specifically the oceans. I hate what's been done to them and how quickly its turning to shit out there.This theory was advanced by the late Dr William Gray at the Colorado State University Atmospheric Sciences Department. He was the original author of the yearly hurricane forecast so his influence was substantial. He argued strongly that climate change was due to solar cycles and so his students did a great deal of work validating this thesis.
They proved the opposite.
No matter what the sun is doing- and it doesn't change much, or life on Earth wouldn't exist in the first place- atmospheric carbon dioxide will still affect temperatures here and therefore an increase in CO² will result in higher temperatures.
Weather and climate records are bearing this out in very close agreement with projections based on increased CO² emissions.
There's another factor that's recently become a more widely recognized influence on climate and that's the high and rising levels of methane emissions. These are coming from the fossil fuel industry, primarily fracking. They're also starting to come from methane hydrates and clathrates that are dissolving as tundra and oceans warm up.
This cannot be explained away by solar cycles:
View attachment 4166797
Astonishingly obtuse. Is that why they're furiously lobbying to limit and even eliminate renewable energy?There is nothing at stake for big oil, there is nothing of scale to replace it atm. Research funding could end any moment. So you're way off base.
Stay there until you've actually read some climate science.Back under my rock..
Lol dude is attacking people in every post and your calling me out for saying his name is ironic? Really dude?So switch the argument to personal attacks when you've lost the debate.
Classic right wing substitution of thinking for argument
.
Dude@abandonconflict should prolly change his user name to something more fitting. Like PCprinciple or something. Dude your so aggro, do you need a spotter? Relax dude this is a pot growing forum.
If your saying those cycles are well understood, arnt we saying the same thing? Hahah jesus christ dude you need to relax! Maybe get on some meds or something you seem unbalanced
Dude
He pointed out to you that the "other factors" you said weren't accounted for are in fact accounted for in AGW climate model predictions. The cooling cycle the sun is now entering? Well known, well understood and factored into the figures for projected temperature rise from climate science models that also account for the greenhouse effect due to human activities.
If you had seen coral reef the die-offs that AC has seen, you'd be uninterested in coddling climate denial fools too.
You said that global climate models don't account for "other factors" such as the cooling cycle that the sun is now in. That is demonstrably false and I'm glad to point that out to you.Pretty sure I've said several times what is being done to the oceans is horrible and needs lots of money and physical work and we need to heal our planet.
I think the massive ammount of plastics and toxic waste, along with trash barges are a MAJOR aspect of this.
You've already said my thinking is clearly muddled and therefore irrelevant but you asked a follow up question. So if we have a conversation are you hoping to just pepper it with insults the whole way or what's the game plan?You said that global climate models don't account for "other factors" such as the cooling cycle that the sun is now in. That is demonstrably false and I'm glad to point that out to you.
Coral reefs are very sensitive to temperature change. Bleaching due to water temperature change is a very well known phenomenon.
What you think is clearly muddled and therefore irrelevant. However, it is true that pollution makes coral reefs even more susceptible to bleaching.
Not sure if you are US citizen or not. What do you think of the US's breaking its agreement with practically all other countries by leaving the Paris climate agreement?
He put 33 panels in 11 years ago.Followed some money to al Gore's house and didn't see any wind turbines or solar panels, really odd.