Inside the Mind of Climate Denial

G

growingforfun

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i love it when you trumptards try to pretend to be liberals

methigan is not alone
Click to expand...
Lol dude I'm trying to rally support for a dem candidate for president since before trump took office, and to hopefully beat him in 2020. Female, minority.
Please miss the mark by more dude.
 
T

The Government

Member
Fogdog said:
The only people who say the science is not settled are science deniers.
Click to expand...
Yeah sure OR an actual scientist testing a hypothesis before drawing a conclusion. So what's the ideal saturation of co2 in the atmosphere if you are settled on the science that our current 380 is just so darned unacceptable?

Still waiting.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
The Government said:
John cooks consensus has been thoroughly trashed and includes such scientists as William happer and Richard lindzen as part of your 97% consensus.

You should read more.
Click to expand...
No it hasn't. The meta analysis of studies itself was peer reviewed to specifically seek biases and oil funding. It only includes peer reviewed studies conducted empirically and with sound methods. If you could point to a single peer reviewed study which concludes that anthropogenic climate change is false, even just one measly stinking fucking study, you might have a leg to stand on. Nobody has done it on this site. One idiot named Muypoco linked an article from a magazine that concluded that some studies aren't alarmist but not a single study cited by that article concluded anything that contradicts what the 97% of studies soundly conclude.

Just one god damned study.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The Government said:
Yeah sure OR an actual scientist testing a hypothesis before drawing a conclusion. So what's the ideal saturation of co2 in the atmosphere if you are settled on the science that our current 380 is just so darned unacceptable?

Still waiting.
Click to expand...
speaking of scientists and experts, can you name one that sides with your insane conspiracy theories?
 
T

The Government

Member
growingforfun said:
Pretty much agree with this.
Even in a very liberal college in oregon none of the professors we half as zealous as some of these guys in here.
Half these guys are just looking for fights! It's funny to me I'm actually saying MOSTLY the same thing, and then the repeats what I'm saying an calls me wrong hahaha
Calls me right wing when I'm looking for Dems to beat trump in 2020..

This is why people laugh and make fun of dems now.
Click to expand...
It's just so fucking extreme ya know? Agree with me 100% or you are the enemy because my politics are literally my humanity. It's sad shit to watch.
 
G

growingforfun

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
wanna know how i know that you are a trumptard?
Click to expand...
Because you assume I am?

lol gimme a break! As far as immigration goes I say all the time we need to work out a better path to legal immigration and sneaking across illegally is wrong. More people die in those deserts and are raped in the process than can be counted. It needs to stop. But you can look at it that way so you hate me
 
G

growingforfun

Well-Known Member
And ironically Mrs Clinton has the same boarder views. As did Obama, but you also are looking for reason to hate people buck.
 
travisw

travisw

Well-Known Member
T

The Government

Member
abandonconflict said:
No it hasn't. The meta analysis of studies itself was peer reviewed to specifically seek biases and oil funding. It only includes peer reviewed studies conducted empirically and with sound methods. If you could point to a single peer reviewed study which concludes that anthropogenic climate change is false, even just one measly stinking fucking study, you might have a leg to stand on. Nobody has done it on this site. One idiot named Muypoco linked an article from a magazine that concluded that some studies aren't alarmist but not a single study cited by that article concluded anything that contradicts what the 97% of studies soundly conclude.

Just one god damned study.
Click to expand...
Any position that disagrees with you by an actual scientist is included in the 97% consensus. All climate scientist, even your so called "deniers" agree that humans are affecting the climate. That is what includes them in cooks consensus. The debate is to what degree are humans contributing.

And here you are trying to exclude me from the consensus like a not smart person.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
growingforfun said:
Because you assume I am?

lol gimme a break! As far as immigration goes I say all the time we need to work out a better path to legal immigration and sneaking across illegally is wrong. More people die in those deserts and are raped in the process than can be counted. It needs to stop. But you can look at it that way so you hate me
Click to expand...
growingforfun said:
And ironically Mrs Clinton has the same boarder views. As did Obama, but you also are looking for reason to hate people buck.
Click to expand...
waaaaaahhhhhhhhh

trumptard
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The Government said:
Any position that disagrees with you by an actual scientist is included in the 97% consensus. All climate scientist, even your so called "deniers" agree that humans are affecting the climate. That is what includes them in cooks consensus. The debate is to what degree are humans contributing.

And here you are trying to exclude me from the consensus like a not smart person.
Click to expand...
seriously, is this your 80th sock puppet already twopump?
 
T

The Government

Member
travisw said:
So @twostroke, why deny who you are,



and immediately start posting,



the same shit, you posted last time you were here?


Click to expand...
Keep seeing the boogeyman travis, this is all readily available information.

In a thread titled "introduction to tcp" John cook layed out his marketing plan for the 97% consensus before the research was even started.

It's pure bunk.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top