Civil Discourse

[UncleBuck]

Forgive, I thought I had already explained. I did not understand it was a farcical argument, I thought it was a first amendment issue resolved by the SC in recent masterpiece bakery decision. You set me straight. Hope that answers your question.

you don't think it resembles a farce, especially because of the absurd and ridiculous aspects, to argue that your religious liberty is being violated if you open a store and people who are gay or black go to your store for goods and services?

 

[Buddha2525]

Ok. Good topic today.

Are the national parks a good idea? What are the biggest threats to our national parks?

The National Parks exist because some entities live there along with phenomena which would endanger the mass public.

 

[Fogdog]

guys, this is supposed to be civil discourse.

The question of the day is: Why should anybody try to have a civil discussion with an ignoramus who just believes what right wing propaganda tells him to believe?

 

[UncleBuck]

Why do you not tell that to mollie Tibets.

yeah, that's totally how americans speak right there buddy

 

[UncleBuck]

I have never in my life, met so many delusional than you,

hey buddy, how's the weather in estonia today?

 

[Bugeye]

you don't think it resembles a farce, especially because of the absurd and ridiculous aspects, to argue that your religious liberty is being violated if you open a store and people who are gay or black go to your store for goods and services?

Of course, the very idea of a Supreme Court case about cake is farsical, I agree.

 

[MichiganSpinDoctor]

Well thank you everybody, for another day of civil discourse.

Today's topic was: Are the national parks a good idea? What are the biggest threats to our national parks?

We got answers that vary. (Although we all agreed that the national parks are a good idea) I suggested that the national parks are a great idea and that the biggest threat comes from the oil and gas industry. The articles someone posted in the thread crystallized my disagreement with President Trump.

Thanks again everyone. Keep growing.

 

[Fogdog]

The question of the day is: Why should anybody try to have a civil discussion with an ignoramus who just believes what right wing propaganda tells him to believe?

 

[UncleBuck]

Of course, the very idea of a Supreme Court case about cake is farsical, I agree.

i asked if you think it resembles a farce, especially because of the absurd and ridiculous aspects, to argue that your religious liberty is being violated if you open a store and people who are gay or black go to your store for goods and services.

do you?

you must, otherwise you would not have brought up the same argument that has been used to deny service to black and gay people

 

[Bugeye]

The question of the day is: Why should anybody try to have a civil discussion with an ignoramus who just believes what right wing propaganda tells him to believe?

Have you thought about starting a liberals only civil discussion thread?

 

[Buddha2525]

Have you thought about starting a liberals only civil discussion thread?

Aren't all their threads already their version of civil?

 

[UncleBuck]

The question of the day is: Why should anybody try to have a civil discussion with an ignoramus who just believes what right wing propaganda tells him to believe?

well, to comment on the topic of the day, they shouldn't

RWNJs are notoriously uncivil people in belief and action. they think that kicking black people out of their stores is protected under the guise of "religious liberty" it is patently absurd. they should just own up to their bigotry and stop trying to hide it under false pretenses

this type of insincere argument in bad faith is impossible to reason with. call them out as the bigoted retards they are and move on.

 

[UncleBuck]

Aren't all their threads already their version of civil?

tell us more about your neo-nazi beliefs that societies can only be valuable if run by whites

 

[Tim1987]

Have you thought about starting a liberals only civil discussion thread?

.

Aren't all their threads already their version of civil?

Adjective or noun?

liberal
ˈlɪb(ə)r(ə)l/
adjective

1. 1.
   willing to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas.
   "liberal views towards divorce"
2. 2.
   (of education) concerned with broadening a person's general knowledge and experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
   "the provision of liberal adult education"
   synonyms: wide-ranging, broad-based, general, humanistic
   "the provision of liberal adult education"

 

[Buddha2525]

tell us more about your neo-nazi beliefs that societies can only be valuable if run by whites

I think I stated my belief in a NWO China once they again embrace their Buddhist roots. Whites are already a lost cause who haven't learned their lesson and are utterly retarded that they "help" those who see them as forever the "white devil". Our only hope left is putting our chickens with the second most powerful Chinese army, while waiting for the first to constantly get destroyed saying sorry to deaf ears.

 

[Buddha2525]

.


Adjective or noun?

liberal
ˈlɪb(ə)r(ə)l/
adjective

1. 1.
   willing to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas.
   "liberal views towards divorce"
2. 2.
   (of education) concerned with broadening a person's general knowledge and experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
   "the provision of liberal adult education"
   synonyms: wide-ranging, broad-based, general, humanistic
   "the provision of liberal adult education"

I think you accidentally posted the definition of neo-nazi, because I belive in that definition you posted, but no one here calls me a liberal in any sense.

 

[Tim1987]

I think I stated my belief in a NWO China once they again embrace their Buddhist roots. Whites are already a lost cause who haven't learned their lesson and are utterly retarded that they "help" those who see them as forever the "white devil". Our only hope left is putting our chickens with the second most powerful Chinese army, while waiting for the first to constantly get destroyed saying sorry to deaf ears.

Wow dude that is so fucking racist I don't even know what to tell you.

You should be ashamed to call yourself Chinese.
Or freaking Buddhist for that matter.

What a sad excuse for superiority you have.
Completely one sided bigot.

Geez I hope all Buddhist are not like this.

You are so damn spiteful it actually hurts.
I actually like the Chinese. Welcome them to this country where I am.

I would not welcome you. I'd protest.
"Your a fucking racist dog"

Gee. Sorry if it hurt your poor feelings.

 

[Tim1987]

I think you accidentally posted the definition of neo-nazi, because I belive in that definition you posted, but no one here calls me a liberal in any sense.

That's because your a stupid, dumb, ignorant racist.

 

[Fogdog]

Have you thought about starting a liberals only civil discussion thread?

please be civil

 

[Fogdog]

The question of the day is: Why should anybody try to have a civil discussion with an ignoramus who just believes what right wing propaganda tells him to believe?