Ramirez already contacted by FBI

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Why did the Democrats take Flake into a small room, drug him and gang rape him and convince him to agree to the exact terms he stated when he placed his vote? Whine to them, bozo.
I guess the terms of this sham investigation were indeed set by democrats who don’t control either chamber of congress or the White House

Good point, stinky
 

relaxinginUSA

Active Member
Nobody agreed to a sham investigation. Too funny that you think there is some conspiracy with Flake. The only reason why this investigation is happening at all is because Flake and a couple of other Republicans aren't convinced to vote for the raping judge.

Just pointing out that this investigation is a sham. It's up to the few thinking Republicans left to decide what they want to do.
They are only investigating credible allegations. And it must be completed in 1 week. Did you listen to Coons and Klobuchar? That's what they asked for. One week. Anita Hill's took 2 or 3 days.
 

relaxinginUSA

Active Member
I guess the terms of this sham investigation were indeed set by democrats who don’t control either chamber of congress or the White House

Good point, stinky
Then why did they ask Flake to agree to those terms? Derp. Votes, bozo. There was a good chance the Republicans wouldn't have had them without the investigation that was limited in scope and time. The Dems were given exactly what they asked for. Whine to them.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
They are only investigating credible allegations. And it must be completed in 1 week. Did you listen to Coons and Klobuchar? That's what they asked for. One week. Anita Hill's took 2 or 3 days.
Julie swetnick signed a sworn affidavit testifying to how kavanaugh and judge gang raped women after drugging them

Why did trump make that off limits, stinky?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Then why did they ask Flake to agree to those terms? Derp. Votes, bozo. There was a good chance the Republicans wouldn't have had them without the investigation that was limited in scope and time. The Dems were given exactly what they asked for. Whine to them.
So did the dems make Julie swetnick, kavsnaughs blackout drinking, and judge’s work history off limits, stinky?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
They are only investigating credible allegations. And it must be completed in 1 week. Did you listen to Coons and Klobuchar? That's what they asked for. One week. Anita Hill's took 2 or 3 days.
Is that so? How does one decide if an allegation is credible without questioning the person making the allegation? The investigation is a sham.

The people who will decide Judge Rapey's fate aren't idiots. They have been around long enough to know what is an honest attempt and what is not. It all depends on what Flake decides and what the other Republican fence-sitters decide to do.
 

relaxinginUSA

Active Member
Is that so? How does one decide if an allegation is credible without questioning the person making the allegation? The investigation is a sham.

The people who will decide Judge Rapey's fate aren't idiots. They have been around long enough to know what is an honest attempt and what is not. It all depends on what Flake decides and what the other Republican fence-sitters decide to do.
Whine to the Democrats who proposed this investigation and convinced Flake to go along with it. Earlier Friday morning, Flake said he would vote for Kavanaugh - no strings attached. Hours later, after the Dems got him into the little room, drugged and gang raped him, they convinced him to agree to a 1 week investigation, otherwise he would not vote for Kavanaugh. That's the deal the Dems struck, and the one they got. Whine to them. Elections have consequences.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Is that so? How does one decide if an allegation is credible without questioning the person making the allegation? The investigation is a sham.

The people who will decide Judge Rapey's fate aren't idiots. They have been around long enough to know what is an honest attempt and what is not. It all depends on what Flake decides and what the other Republican fence-sitters decide to do.
If Julie swetnick wasn’t credible, trump would order an investigation into her claims that refuted her and made her look like an idiot, and it would weaken the other rape claims by proxy

He didn’t do that because he knows they’re credible and a real investigation will prove it

This investigation is a sham
 

relaxinginUSA

Active Member
So did the dems make Julie swetnick, kavsnaughs blackout drinking, and judge’s work history off limits, stinky?
Name one Democratic Senator who mentioned the name "Julie Swetnick" during Friday's hearing. They didn't, because they were too embarrassed to even bring it up.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Whine to the Democrats who proposed this investigation and convinced Flake to go along with it. Earlier Friday morning, Flake said he would vote for Kavanaugh - no strings attached. Hours later, after the Dems got him into the little room, drugged and gang raped him, they convinced him to agree to a 1 week investigation, otherwise he would not vote for Kavanaugh. That's the deal the Dems struck, and the one they got. Whine to them. Elections have consequences.
Did the dems order kavanaughs blackout drinking, mark judge’s work history and Julie swetnicks gang rape claims off limits too, stinky?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Name one Democratic Senator who mentioned the name "Julie Swetnick" during Friday's hearing. They didn't, because they were too embarrassed to even bring it up.
So if they never mentioned her name, then how could they have made her gang rape claims off limits in this sham investigation, stinky?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Whine to the Democrats who proposed this investigation and convinced Flake to go along with it. Earlier Friday morning, Flake said he would vote for Kavanaugh - no strings attached. Hours later, after the Dems got him into the little room, drugged and gang raped him, they convinced him to agree to a 1 week investigation, otherwise he would not vote for Kavanaugh. That's the deal the Dems struck, and the one they got. Whine to them. Elections have consequences.
I'm just responding to your arguments. If you don't want to talk aobut why you are wrong, then just fall back to trollaing and I'll be glad to repeat my standard reply to trolls.

Yes, Flake in fact voted to affirm Kavanaugh in the committee. It doesn't really matter who convinced him to demand an investigation but you'd agree that it was within his right to do so, wouldn't you?

So, now if the investigation is thorough enough to convince Flake and a few other Republican Senators to vote yes, a rapey lying justice will be appointed for life to the SCOTUS. The interference that Trump made on the investigation makes it a sham and puts it in jeopardy with those senators but the truth would sink the nomination anyway. You right wingers always get tripped up in your lies.
 

relaxinginUSA

Active Member
If Julie swetnick wasn’t credible, trump would order an investigation into her claims that refuted her and made her look like an idiot, and it would weaken the other rape claims by proxy

He didn’t do that because he knows they’re credible and a real investigation will prove it

This investigation is a sham
If Swetnick was credible, the Dems would've been shouting it from the rooftops at Fridays hearing. Instead . . . crickets. They knew better. As to your claim that refuting her claim would somehow make other rape claims less credible "by proxy" is a horrible thing to say. They are separate claims, separate facts and should be judge accordingly. Because 1 woman's claim is deemed not credible, all others are weakened by proxy? Nice logic, bozo. Someone should pull your alt-left card.
 

relaxinginUSA

Active Member
I'm just responding to your arguments. If you don't want to talk aobut why you are wrong, then just fall back to trollaing and I'll be glad to repeat my standard reply to trolls.

Yes, Flake in fact voted to affirm Kavanaugh in the committee. It doesn't really matter who convinced him to demand an investigation but you'd agree that it was within his right to do so, wouldn't you?

So, now if the investigation is thorough enough to meet Flake's and a few other Republican Senators who weren't convinced by Kavanaugh on Thursday a rapey lying Trump partisan anti-women's rights justice will be appointed for life to the SCOTUS. The interference that Trump made on the investigation makes it a sham and puts it in jeopardy with those senators but the truth would sink the nomination anyway. You right wingers always get tripped up in your lies.
Wrong. Flake put out a statement in the morning that he was going to vote to confirm Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, when it came to a vote later. He changed his mind after speaking with the Democrats. He only voted to move it out of the committee, which was the only point of Fridays hearing. He didn't vote to affirm anything. Elections have consequences, bozo. Whine to the Democrats who struck that deal.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Elections have consequences, bozo. Whine to the Democrats who struck that deal.
Yes, elections matter and so did Thursday's hearing. That hearing made Republican seats less likely to be held in some districts, which is why that investigation had to be done properly. It is now clearly a sham. I can see how one or two Republican Senators might decide to vote against Judge Rapey in order to keep their seat in the Senate. Flake isn't running and so is able to decide however he likes.

Flake and a few other Republican senators asked for an investigation. Trump's interference made this investigation a sham so now their votes are at risk. It's probably true that the truth would sink Kavanaugh so I understand why Trump made it into a sham. Do you see how Republican lies create so many problems for them. The got shit done last year because of that.
 

relaxinginUSA

Active Member
Yes, elections matter and so did Thursday's hearing. That hearing made Republican seats less likely to be held in some districts, which is why that investigation had to be done properly. It is now clearly a sham. I can see how one or two Republican Senators might decide to vote against Judge Rapey in order to keep their seat in the Senate. Flake isn't running and so is able to decide however he likes.

Flake and a few other Republican senators asked for an investigation. Trump's interference made this investigation a sham so now their votes are at risk. It's probably true that the truth would sink Kavanaugh so I understand why Trump made it into a sham. Do you see how Republican lies create so many problems for them. The got shit done last year because of that.
Ok, so you understand that Flake didn't "affirm" anything, correct? And the only point of Fridays hearing was to move it out of committee (or not)? You can say the investigation is a sham as much as you want. Nobody cares about your beliefs or feelings. Elections have consequences. Fact.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Ok, so you understand that Flake didn't "affirm" anything, correct? And the only point of Fridays hearing was to move it out of committee (or not)? You can say the investigation is a sham as much as you want. Nobody cares about your beliefs or feelings. Elections have consequences. Fact.
It's true that Republicans are the only people who can stop Kavaanough from being seated. As you say, elections matter. The investigation, which is a sham was initiated because Republican Senator Flake and some unnamed Republican Senators asked for the investigation. Trump ordered a sham investigation because the truth would sink Kavanaugh's affirmation by a floor vote in the Senate. Will the Republicans who asked for an investigation be satisfied with a sham investigation? Maybe, maybe not. You should go whine to your Republican overlords if you don't like what's happening.

Ms Ford's testimony was very convincing. So convincing that Republicans were forced to call for an investigation. Because Ford WAS telling the truth, GOP leaders made the investigation into a sham to make it less likely that the truth would come out in this investigation. We keep getting back to the fact that Republicans are habitual liars.
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
There's a difference between being a whore for patriotism, and realizing we have merely lost our way. The symbol America stands for will never change. Our goal was based upon what Monroe's Doctrine specifically spelled out. That vision forever changed the moment FDR took a shit on America's floor. But you know all about that philosophy.


Whatever the cost
We will never surrender
Leave abandoned the loss
When the rich wage war
And the patriotic whores
Dig their own grave
For their own sake
Another casualty
Another travesty

 
Top