How do these Social based countries keep doing it?

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Can I ask why she cannot get in to see a Dr? You didn't say for some strange reason.
My step farther happens to be a GP and IDK what he earns now but roughly 12 years ago it worked out roughly to $70 per 15 minutes. Would only be more now, so if you were alluding to a monetary compensation then you would be mistaken. We also have a GP shortage in the rural towns, cities and centres but not in the major cities were we have an over abundance of them.

Tell your Canadian friend to tell his mother just to rock up to a hospital or medical centre on a week day morning and they should get in to see a GP fairly quickly.

And Yes social countries do infact get a better health care result for less money. Its probably one of the reasons that citizens of countries with a social outlook are happier. Your Trump even said that Australia has a better health care system than America. Its on you tube somewhere, I believe @doublejj posted it somewhere to.

I like having social healthcare. My mother in law who is stage 4 cancer moved states and into my home on Sunday. She had a 2 hr GP appointment on Monday. Going back to the practice today for blood tests etc and should be back on the Chemo train next week. All for $0 and of cause for a sick pensioner no monetary worries on top of her health concerns. Even her pills are heavily subsidized by the govt (Im sure the govt also negotiates a fair price for the pills with big Pharma to..). The people being looked after fairly by the people. What's so wrong with that?
Is it a perfect system? Of cause not but its a far better system than the alternatives. We even live longer.
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
I said the Prescription would be heavily subsidised, and it was by more than I even thought. I did the chemist run this morning and got 3 or possibly 4 diff types of tablets for her and her husband. Cost using Brand name drugs was a couple $ per script. Generic brand was Free. I walked out not paying a cent.
Makes you feel good to be part of a society helping out elderly pensioners with $0 much in the bank.
 
Last edited:

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
More o your BS

I have a canadian friend, long time business owner in the US. His mother live in Canada, but she can't get an appointment to see a doctor there
Tell her to go to the hospital, walk-in clinic, community health co-op, WTF are you babbling on about? I know a guy in the States who had to declare bankruptcy and his wife still died due to lack of health care so there. And I thought you were leaving here, what ever happened with that lol,
 

too larry

Well-Known Member
Guns are great, no?



Sadly the damn Brazilians just edged us out of 1st place. I wonder why all the countries leading the gun death game are in the Americas. Maybe we just want it more.

All those dead people have to make the wait at Doctor's offices shorter.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Don't mention this to the NRA, but 64% of all gun deaths in America are self inflicted.
It's reasonable to project that 90 something percent of obesity related deaths are self inflicted. Should a central authority define what a person can or cannot consume and how much etc. ?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It's reasonable to project that 90 something percent of obesity related deaths are self inflicted. Should a central authority define what a person can or cannot consume and how much etc. ?
No need to be upset. Your gun is not gonna save you from some minority you are scared of

Your gun is gonna be used, by you, to put a bullet through your own head in all likelihood
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
No need to be upset. Your gun is not gonna save you from some minority you are scared of

Your gun is gonna be used, by you, to put a bullet through your own head in all likelihood
I find your erroneous projections both amusing and sad. You see, you're the one supporting using guns to force people to comply with your ideas which mostly feature legal impositions that begin with an application of government sponsored offensive force against neutral people on their own property.

Why do you want to shoot black people (or any people of any race) who behave as if they have the right to self determine and who don't need or want to be forced to ask for permission to control themselves and their property?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I find your erroneous projections both amusing and sad. You see, you're the one supporting using guns to force people to comply with your ideas which mostly feature legal impositions that begin with an application of government sponsored offensive force against neutral people on their own property.

Why do you want to shoot black people (or any people of any race) who behave as if they have the right to self determine and who don't need or want to be forced to ask for permission to control themselves and their property?
Your guns most likely use will be to shoot and kill you or whoever has the misfortune to live with your poor nazi ass
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Your guns most likely use will be to shoot and kill you or whoever has the misfortune to live with your poor nazi ass
Many of the laws you advocate are 100% backed by threats of offensive gun use, especially those silly laws designed to prevent defensive gun use as an option.

Your argument to remove guns relies on the use of guns. A failed circular argument, with aspects of fawning state worship and plank in the eye "logic" .

Your arguments are more likely to shoot you in the foot, BECAUSE they are circular and nonsensical when scrutinized. I do not have a Nazi ass, it's hairy though and keeps me warm on cold nights.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Many of the laws you advocate are 100% backed by threats of offensive gun use, especially those silly laws designed to prevent defensive gun use as an option.

Your argument to remove guns relies on the use of guns. A failed circular argument, with aspects of fawning state worship and plank in the eye "logic" .

Your arguments are more likely to shoot you in the foot, BECAUSE they are circular and nonsensical when scrutinized. I do not have a Nazi ass, it's hairy though and keeps me warm on cold nights.
Not many laws are punishable with death by firing squad except possibly pedophilia laws and we all know you don’t support those

But the fact is your personal guns most likely use will be you killing yourself or anyone unfortunate enough to co-subsist with your pathetic nazi ass
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Not many laws are punishable with death by firing squad except possibly pedophilia laws and we all know you don’t support those

But the fact is your personal guns most likely use will be you killing yourself or anyone unfortunate enough to co-subsist with your pathetic nazi ass

Not Nazi ass!! Hairy ass dammit !

The fact is, all laws are punishable by death eventually, even the victimless crime laws, if a person declines to lick the boots you slobber over so subserviently.

Your flawed factoid about the most likely use of my guns relies on statistics derived from other peoples behavior, when it's my behavior which is the determinant that should carry the weight. That's like saying Wendy's bathrooms cause 3% of all 17 year old pimply faced drunks to defecate on the floor, when in fact the predisposition to being a floor shitter is a greater causative thing.

You're still losing.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Not Nazi ass!! Hairy ass dammit !

The fact is, all laws are punishable by death eventually, even the victimless crime laws, if a person declines to lick the boots you slobber over so subserviently.

Your flawed factoid about the most likely use of my guns relies on statistics derived from other peoples behavior, when it's my behavior which is the determinant that should carry the weight. That's like saying Wendy's bathrooms cause 3% of all 17 year old pimply faced drunks to defecate on the floor, when in fact the predisposition to being a floor shitter is a greater causative thing.

You're still losing.
No, almost no laws are punishable by death

Your guns most likely use will be to put a bullet through your own head or the head of anyone unfortunate enough to have to co habitats with your nazi ass
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
No, almost no laws are punishable by death

Your guns most likely use will be to put a bullet through your own head or the head of anyone unfortunate enough to have to co habitats with your nazi ass
You're more likely to give your mommy forty wacks and your daddy forty-one with your axe in a drunken homicidal rage than any home invader.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
It's reasonable to project that 90 something percent of obesity related deaths are self inflicted. Should a central authority define what a person can or cannot consume and how much etc. ?
I'm completely OK with gun owners using their guns for suicide. It's when they turn them on innocent people while on a rampage that I think perhaps it's time to restrict gun sales. A redesign that would enhance lethality and simplicity of using a gun in suicide while making it harder to kill, like, a hundred people in a short time, could be the answer.
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
You're more likely to give your mommy forty wacks and your daddy forty-one with your axe in a drunken homicidal rage than any home invader.
Your most likely to give your mommy forty milkings ...... I doubt you’ve let go of her tit. All the while calling women vile and dirty.....incel I presume :(. You did say you were picked on as a kid right, have you talked to anyone about the long lasting hurt it caused? You seem to lie a lot, mostly to yourself.....sad.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Your most likely to give your mommy forty milkings ...... I doubt you’ve let go of her tit. All the while calling women vile and dirty.....incel I presume :(. You did say you were picked on as a kid right, have you talked to anyone about the long lasting hurt it caused? You seem to lie a lot, mostly to yourself.....sad.
He does insult the women of America often, doesn't he?
 
Top