is this the middle ages?

Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Race ???? or do you mean species.
Manifest Destiny ….fail or great
Click to expand...
all humans are one race....we're all homo sapiens. there is less genetic diversity among human beings than any other species on earth.
what people call "the races of man" are not races at all, just minor genetic variations, due to environmental differences.
 
NWO4LIFE

NWO4LIFE

Active Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
all humans are one race....we're all homo sapiens. there is less genetic diversity among human beings than any other species on earth.
what people call "the races of man" are not races at all, just minor genetic variations, due to environmental differences.
Click to expand...
and that's why it's ok to wear indigenous feather hats when gulping down a gram of molly
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
all humans are one race....we're all homo sapiens. there is less genetic diversity among human beings than any other species on earth.
what people call "the races of man" are not races at all, just minor genetic variations, due to environmental differences.
Click to expand...
all humans are the same species, not the same race. Helpful to know when treating certain illnesses and diseases
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Answers in red and your utopia would have everyone doing what ever the fuck they want. ANARCHY
Click to expand...

I'm thinking you are one of the people that believes "anarchy" is a state of violent chaos. Common error, aided by the repetition of your master's self serving indoctrination. I'm being serious BTW.

Anarchy simply means "without a ruler". Meaning the status quo of all humans is equality, which I endorse. If you cared to, you could check the etymology of the word.

Although, in your case, that doesn't help very much, since you, like many others, confuse the meaning of the word equality. You erroneously think that "equality" means an existing coercion based authority(s) applies dominion over it's subjects equally. Or licenses it's dominion out to others who it favors so they can exercise dominion over others "legally". Which only means the status quo then is "equality of oppression" , not real equality. That is immutably self evident. (that means it's true and even if you get enough people to vote or believe differently, it can never make it not true)

I think your failing to answer any of my questions is telling. You avoided them or conflated the conversation.

You did ask some reasonable questions, thank you, but wondering or questioning how things might operate in "my utopia" isn't the same thing as offering justification for the contradictions and inequities of what presently exists.

In the present, the "normal" dystopia relies on a contradiction and using offensive force as a systemic primary means, while at the same time convincing dumbed down people that offensive force is needed "so nobody will use offensive force". That is another impossible lie that has been repeated so often , that it's convinced people it's accurate.

Happy trails.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I'm thinking you are one of the people that believes "anarchy" is a state of violent chaos. Common error, aided by the repetition of your master's self serving indoctrination. I'm being serious BTW.

Anarchy simply means "without a ruler". Meaning the status quo of all humans is equality, which I endorse. If you cared to, you could check the etymology of the word.

Although, in your case, that doesn't help very much, since you, like many others, confuse the meaning of the word equality. You erroneously think that "equality" means an existing coercion based authority(s) applies dominion over it's subjects equally. Or licenses it's dominion out to others who it favors so they can exercise dominion over others "legally". Which only means the status quo then is "equality of oppression" , not real equality. That is immutably self evident. (that means it's true and even if you get enough people to vote or believe differently, it can never make it not true)

I think your failing to answer any of my questions is telling. You avoided them or conflated the conversation.

You did ask some reasonable questions, thank you, but wondering or questioning how things might operate in "my utopia" isn't the same thing as offering justification for the contradictions and inequities of what presently exists.

In the present, the "normal" dystopia relies on a contradiction and using offensive force as a systemic primary means, while at the same time convincing dumbed down people that offensive force is needed "so nobody will use offensive force". That is another impossible lie that has been repeated so often , that it's convinced people it's accurate.

Happy trails.
Click to expand...
^^^^^pedo
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
Yes, your point is that you’re a pedo
Click to expand...
No, my point is that another persons point must come from them, not somebody else. The same as consent must come from an individual who is capable of consenting and has consented. You don't believe that.

In a sense you have much in common with a pedo. You believe consent of other people doesn't matter, and you like to include offensive force as your primary means. Plus, you're a poopy pants who's never actually beaten me in any kind of argument.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
No, my point is that another persons point must come from them, not somebody else. The same as consent must come from an individual who is capable of consenting and has consented. You don't believe that.

In a sense you have much in common with a pedo. You believe consent of other people doesn't matter, and you like to include offensive force as your primary means. Plus, you're a poopy pants who's never actually beaten me in any kind of argument.
Click to expand...
11 year olds can never consent to sex you fucking pedophile
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I'm thinking you are one of the people that believes "anarchy" is a state of violent chaos. Common error, aided by the repetition of your master's self serving indoctrination. I'm being serious BTW.

Anarchy simply means "without a ruler". Meaning the status quo of all humans is equality, which I endorse. If you cared to, you could check the etymology of the word.

Although, in your case, that doesn't help very much, since you, like many others, confuse the meaning of the word equality. You erroneously think that "equality" means an existing coercion based authority(s) applies dominion over it's subjects equally. Or licenses it's dominion out to others who it favors so they can exercise dominion over others "legally". Which only means the status quo then is "equality of oppression" , not real equality. That is immutably self evident. (that means it's true and even if you get enough people to vote or believe differently, it can never make it not true)

I think your failing to answer any of my questions is telling. You avoided them or conflated the conversation.

You did ask some reasonable questions, thank you, but wondering or questioning how things might operate in "my utopia" isn't the same thing as offering justification for the contradictions and inequities of what presently exists.

In the present, the "normal" dystopia relies on a contradiction and using offensive force as a systemic primary means, while at the same time convincing dumbed down people that offensive force is needed "so nobody will use offensive force". That is another impossible lie that has been repeated so often , that it's convinced people it's accurate.

Happy trails.
Click to expand...
I only read the first paragraph. Anarchy also means "a state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority" which in this day and time would be nothing but chaos. Why is it so difficult for you to keep a conversation honest ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top