well that's English for ya. Words can have more than one meaning. My meaning is the one of chaos.
Do you think people will magically get along with no rule or law. .Dude you need to seek reality
Except, your assumptions are in error, as usual.
Self rule is not "no rule". In fact it's the only way to achieve equality and peace. That's demonstrably true btw.
If another person rules you, you aren't being treated as an equal. You can't refute that, nor will you try.
If another person(s) is ruling you, the fact that you are being "ruled" rather than in a state of equal co-existence demonstrates that the situation isn't peaceful. It means a threat for noncompliance with the ruler(s) is involved. Threats like that against neutral people, are a form of offensive force, thus, not peaceful.
If there is no threat, then it isn't a ruler, it is a voluntary interaction where a person has the option of disengaging or following a leader versus a ruler(s). Try and refute that, after you've read it a couple times of course, since the concept may be so simple it's foreign to you.
Do I think people will magically get along without rulers? Loaded question. There will always be assholes, but without a mechanism like "government" to inflate the damage an asshole's edict can do, it will be less. Rulers often are not held personally responsible for their acts of aggression against other people as "the system" exempts them from things which would be bad if you or I did it. You won't be able to refute that either.
Reality?
I am the only one in the conversation willing to, and apparently capable of addressing reality. You've confused what you were born into, today's version of "normal", as the way things should be, simply because you can't conceive of any other thing but the existing plantation.
You rail on about "equal rights" , but when I prove to you, that what you think is "equal rights" is in fact a revocable privilege granted by rulers to some slaves to force other slaves to serve them, you start talking about trash rather than use math to prove me wrong. Then the gang of hyenas come in knuckle walking and drooling demonstrating their best arguments via distraction and innuendo. Which of course aren't arguments at all, simply manifestations of their inadequacies to form a coherent thought.
So, how you coming on answering my questions?
