is this the middle ages?

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
We already did this and I showed you where you were wrong remember. Each person has rights and they delegate a portion of of their rights to a person to uphold those rights in their name, it’s called a democracy based on a constitutional goverment. To bad you can’t grasp that.
I do remember and I CORRECTED YOUR ERROR.

Each person has rights, they CAN delegate their rights. They can't delegate YOUR rights though.

If what you are saying is true, (it's not) then slavery and rape if made legal, would also be "right", which of course is wrong.
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
I do remember and I CORRECTED YOUR ERROR.

Each person has rights, they CAN delegate their rights. They can't delegate YOUR rights though.

If what you are saying is true, (it's not) then slavery and rape if made legal, would also be "right", which of course is wrong.
No you didn’t correct it. I have given them the right to delegate my rights, that’s why we elect people, not perfect, but better than what you propose which is unworkable. Try again, your losing.
And now your yelling?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Well being a slave is frustrating. advocating for segregation is a lot of work. Defending pedo’s is stressful. Looking stupid makes him yell. He’s a busy dirty stinking ape (I actually liked Heston until his NRA rant :()
Slaves are people who don't control their own property and can be forced to serve other people, even if they don't consent to it.

I've never advocated for forced segregation or forced integration. Since both contain threats of offensive force, they remove the element of voluntary and mutual consent in a human interaction, hence I reject them as acceptable means to use when engaging other people. Using rapist tactics isn't nice. No, means no.

I don't defend pedo's, they make me uncomfortable, but so do ignorant people that crap on floors.

Of course if a floor crapping delinquent grows up and wants to hold a gala floor crapping new year's eve party in a room festooned with dried female hyena clitoris decorations strung about the ceiling, to be stared at by his guests in a near hallucinogenic trance induced by imbibing cat shit cured weed, prior to the main event of 43 people simultaneously defecating in a thunderous celebration of the new year as the clock strikes midnight....what right do I have to stop them? (If everybody there has the capability to consent and has consented) HUH, WHAT RIGHT DO I HAVE TO STOP THEM!!!????

I probably do need a shower, but my buddy @londonfog loaned me his cologne and said it's mathematically proven to work. He's really really good with math...

 
Last edited:

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Slaves are people who don't control their own property and can be forced to serve other people, even if they don't consent to it.

I've never advocated for forced segregation or forced integration. Since both contain threats of offensive force, they remove the element of voluntary and mutual consent in a human interaction, hence I reject them as acceptable means to use when engaging other people. Using rapist tactics isn't nice. No, means no.

I don't defend pedo's, they make me uncomfortable, but so do ignorant people that crap on floors.

Of course if a floor crapping delinquent grows up and wants to hold a gala floor crapping new year's eve party in a room festooned with dried female hyena clitoris decorations strung about his living room, to be stared at by his guests in a near hallucinogenic trance induced by imbibing cat shit cured weed, prior to the main event of 43 people simultaneously defecating in a thunderous celebration of the new year as the clock strikes midnight....what right do I have to stop them? (If everybody there has the capability to consent and has consented) HUH, WHAT RIGHT DO I HAVE TO STOP THEM!!!????

I probably do need a shower, but my buddy @londonfog loaned me his cologne and said it's mathematically proven to work. He's really really good with math...

What are you ranting about now crazy man. Are you trying to defend the reason why you take up for pedophiles ? and what the hell is your fantasy about shitting on floors. Seek help weirdo.

Why do you hate math. And why use the adjective "good" ? Your English skills are lacking. Reserve the word "good" for food.
The food taste good . The carrots were good . Does that taste good...etc
My math skills are knowledgeable. Which makes me great at math.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
What are you ranting about now crazy man. Are you trying to defend the reason why you take up for pedophiles ? and what the hell is your fantasy about shitting on floors. Seek help weirdo.

Why do you hate math. And why use the adjective "good" ? Your English skills are lacking. Reserve the word "good" for food.
The food taste good . The carrots were good . Does that taste good...etc
My math skills are knowledgeable. Which makes me great at math.
Your math doesn't taste good, needs more zeroes to add some flavor.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
I do appreciate that you are reluctant to condemn somebody based on bad information.

Not quite sure what you're asking though...

Are you saying because I don't think there is a universal age wherein every person magically attains the ability to consent at the EXACT same age that somehow I endorse kiddie diddling ?
dude, don't try to intellectualize this...some things are right, and some things are wrong....i do not care one little bit about the laws of any country....a child...anywhere in the world...is not able to give consent to an adult to have sex with them. period. that's fucking wrong, no matter what "social construct" you use to legitimize it....and you should know it as well as any adult. until that "child" is able to make logical decisions, until that child has had some life experience....it is unqualified to be able to make those kind of decisions.
according to your logic, it's alright to trick mentally handicapped people into doing work for you, as long as they consent to it.....even though they aren't mentally capable of making the decision on their own....
do not try to defend fucking children in any way shape or form...there is no moral justification for it....ever.....if a country says it's ok to fuck 12 year old children....then that's a fucked up country and in my opinion we should just cut them off from the rest of the world till they fucking evolve enough to see that that isn't acceptable behavior.....not fucking try to validate their fucking fucked up choices.....
i can't believe i'm having to type this out for another adult to read.....wtf is wrong with you for even faintly suggesting it might be alright?
 
Last edited:

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Can a person delegate a right they do not possess? No, they cannot.

He thinks it is possible. That means he thinks if you add up enough zeroes (non existent rights of individual people) that you can somehow arrive at a positive sum. You have been corrected now.
you have an odd idea of "rights"...there are no rights, except those granted by a society to it's members....there's no "angel" shaking "rights" over us as we're born.....they're granted by society....if society changes...so do "rights"....the very entity you blame for abridging rights is the beast that makes them, to begin with.....if you do not participate in society, you are kidding yourself about having any rights....you are granting them to yourself...which makes them suspect immediately. your rights are counter productive to the rights of the rest of society...so in logical terms, you are working against the common good, and are an enemy of the people...you are a subversive element, and should be eliminated for the good of the whole.....logically.....
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
you have an odd idea of "rights"...there are no rights, except those granted by a society to it's members....there's no "angel" shaking "rights" over us as we're born.....they're granted by society....if society changes...so do "rights"....the very entity you blame for abridging rights is the beast that makes them, to begin with.....if you do not participate in society, you are kidding yourself about having any rights....you are granting them to yourself...which makes them suspect immediately. your rights are counter productive to the rights of the rest of society...so in logical terms, you are working against the common good, and are an enemy of the people...you are a subversive element, and should be eliminated for the good of the whole.....logically.....
Well I did suggest he go for a walk in the woods wearing his ape suit, hunting season and all.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
dude, don't try to intellectualize this...some things are right, and some things are wrong....i do not care one little bit about the laws of any country....a child...anywhere in the world...is not able to give consent to an adult to have sex with them. period. that's fucking wrong, no matter what "social construct" you use to legitimize it....and you should know it as well as any adult. until that "child" is able to make logical decisions, until that child has had some life experience....it is unqualified to be able to make those kind of decisions.
according to your logic, it's alright to trick mentally handicapped people into doing work for you, as long as they consent to it.....even though they aren't mentally capable of making the decision on their own....
do not try to defend fucking children in any way shape or form...there is no moral justification for it....ever.....if a country says it's ok to fuck 12 year old children....then that's a fucked up country and in my opinion we should just cut them off from the rest of the world till they fucking evolve enough to see that that isn't acceptable behavior.....not fucking try to validate their fucking fucked up choices.....
i can't believe i'm having to type this out for another adult to read.....wtf is wrong with you for even faintly suggesting it might be alright?
Nice strawman. You even included some spicy self-riteous vitriol. Good job.

I've ALWAYS said the only people who can consent are those who possess the wherewithal to consent. Nobody here has ever made a cogent argument to rebut that. Ever. Why don't you school me and become the first?

As far as me "defending things", that's another strawman on your part. While I think a person who owns themself has every right to eat mountains of crappy food and balloon to 700 lbs if that's what they chose to do, I don't "defend" severe obesity, when I recognize I have no right to rip twinkies out of a fat guys mouth. Ditto a racist controlling his own body and a person who HAS the capacity to consent, from controlling their own body.

I don't have to like what other people do, to recognize where my rights end and theirs begin.

What the fuck is wrong with you to think you or anybody else has a right to rip a twinkie from a fat guys mouth?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
you have an odd idea of "rights"...there are no rights, except those granted by a society to it's members....there's no "angel" shaking "rights" over us as we're born.....they're granted by society....if society changes...so do "rights"....the very entity you blame for abridging rights is the beast that makes them, to begin with.....if you do not participate in society, you are kidding yourself about having any rights....you are granting them to yourself...which makes them suspect immediately. your rights are counter productive to the rights of the rest of society...so in logical terms, you are working against the common good, and are an enemy of the people...you are a subversive element, and should be eliminated for the good of the whole.....logically.....
So if "society" said I could chain you to a post, butter your saggy pimply ass with ky jelly and let a band of hungry female hyenas ravage you with their erect pseudo penis female hyena clitori, the majority decision "by society" would make it right? You would possess no right to refuse this? I think you would. (unless you were into hyenas)

You're saying, rights are not somehow intrinsic to individuals and are totally alterable by a
majority decision ? That slavery WASN'T wrong when it was societally accepted?


If wrong exists, right must, since "wrong" only gains meaning when used as a comparative to right. .
 
Last edited:
Top