No Wonder Why Blacks HATE Whites..

ChiefRunningPhist

ChiefRunningPhist

Well-Known Member
zeddd said:
Don’t mind @schuylaar many have her on intermittent ignore, I’ve rolled her off my ignore list for Christmas.
Who are “they”? You started in the singular then moved to plural, it suggests an underlying inconsistency between your thoughts and your posts here.
Click to expand...
They as in the perpetrators of superfluous responses to small infractions. Not sure what you're talking about with plural or singular, sorry if my grammar wasn't correct. I'd wish you listen to the message and not get hung up on the spelling and grammar.

I think I've been more than consistent, I'm the guy arguing with the general sentiment, saying lets live in reality and not get our panties in a bunch especially how we are all so far in proximity from the incident.

That's pretty much what I been saying. I've also said that if it is investigated and it comes out that it wasn't just media hype, that I'll eat my words (I know, how noble of me lol)...

Will anyone eat theirs? Will anyone think twice about this in a month? Will anyone get back on here to acknowledge or correct their opinion? No, people will just move forward because they don't care about the real incident they care about what it did for them back when they were getting attention for it. But to show that I'm not just being bullheaded, I'm saying I'll eat my words if I'm wrong (yum lol), I respect the truth and try to live in reality..
 
Last edited:
zeddd

zeddd

Well-Known Member
ChiefRunningPhist said:
They as in the perpetrators of superfluous responses to small infractions. Not sure what you're talking about with plural or singular, sorry if my grammar wasn't correct. I'd wish you listen to the message and not get hung up on the spelling and grammar.

I think I've been more than consistent, I'm the guy arguing with the general sentiment, saying lets live in reality and not get our panties in a bunch especially how we are all so far in proximity from the incident.

That's pretty much what I been saying. I've also said that if it is investigated and it comes out that it wasn't just media hype, that I'll eat my words (I know, how noble of me lol)...

Will anyone eat theirs? Will anyone think twice about this in a month? Will anyone get back on here to acknowledge or correct their opinion? No, people will just move forward because they don't care about the real incident they care about what it did for them back when they were getting attention for it. But to show that I'm not just being bullheaded, I'm saying I'll eat my words if I'm wrong (yum lol), I respect the truth and try to live in reality..
Click to expand...
It’s not an problem with grammar or spelling, I have ignored all of your mistakes. Trump also doesn’t know when to use “there and your”, “excepted” was funny because it means the opposite of what you were thinking (accepted). No I wouldn’t be so shallow to bring up your grasp of English, it’s the underlying racist apologism I wish to explore.
When you start a sentence with a singular (shuylaar) and then jump to plural (they) without an explanation it implies that you are concealing something.
 
squarepush3r

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
and by the way I wanted to add in, you can only be racist against black people and people with brown skin. Its impossible to be racists against white people because they have institutional power.
 
ChiefRunningPhist

ChiefRunningPhist

Well-Known Member
zeddd said:
It’s not an problem with grammar or spelling, I have ignored all of your mistakes. Trump also doesn’t know when to use “there and your”, “excepted” was funny because it means the opposite of what you were thinking (accepted). No I wouldn’t be so shallow to bring up your grasp of English, it’s the underlying racist apologism I wish to explore.
When you start a sentence with a singular (shuylaar) and then jump to plural (they) without an explanation it implies that you are concealing something.
Click to expand...
I'm linking the two together. They are the same imo.

Lol how is it concealing?

You say you "wouldn't be so shallow as to bring up" my "grasp of English," then go on to cite examples, lol, you kinda got it for me don't you?

Btw it's "a" problem with grammar, not "an" problem with grammar, smh, why are you trying to pick at insignificant shit?
 
Last edited:
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
squarepush3r said:
and by the way I wanted to add in, you can only be racist against black people and people with brown skin. Its impossible to be racists against white people because they have institutional power.
Click to expand...
wrong..it's the discrimination or prejudice of ANY race.

rac·ist
/ˈrāsəst/
noun
  1. 1.
    a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another.
    "the comments have led to her being called a racist"
    synonyms: racial bigot, racialist, xenophobe, chauvinist, supremacist More

adjective
  1. 1.
    showing or feeling discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or believing that a particular race is superior to another.
    "we are investigating complaints about racist abuse at the club"
 
zeddd

zeddd

Well-Known Member
ChiefRunningPhist said:
I'm linking the two together. They are the same imo.

Lol how is it concealing?

You say you "wouldn't be so shallow as to bring up" my "grasp of English," then go on to cite examples, lol, you kinda got it for me don't you?

Btw it's "a" problem with grammar, not "an" problem with grammar, smh, why are you trying to pick at insignificant shit?
Click to expand...
Lol, why are you deflecting from your racist apologism?
 
NWO4LIFE

NWO4LIFE

Active Member
mustbetribbin said:
That's only if you draw the racial line as to whom gets to say what, why should only black people be able to speak about what we all saw happen to the young man?

No matter how you perceive such things occurring, you cannot have a society where other races cannot voice their opinion, this is about a fiber that we can all relate to that grows our from the tops of our heads, anyone that has ever grown hair on their head should be able to voice their opinion no matter what skin color or tribe.

Even people born bald should be able to have an opinion, why discriminate against anyone's intelligence? Especially when it is out of our power to change who or what we are effected by regarding race, gender and sometimes health issues.

Why have you nothing to say other than your disapproval of what others have said, can you share your opinion and tell us or anyone where we are wrong?

What if our intention was genuinely to decrease racial tension, and what if we do genuinely desire to work on understanding each other, what about us that want change and don't have hate for each other in our heart?

Just because the title is off putting for some doesn't mean that the contents of a thread will reflect the same. This forum is full of satirical post titles btw.
Click to expand...
Bro this entire post you made is justification of white privilege. I'm a hillbilly and even I can see that. it's a super easy situation to never repeat again. Never force anyone especially someone from a people that has had their hair be a major issue for superficial reasons to cut their hair especially in a forced way like that. It's real easy but some people just can't get it.
 
mustbetribbin

mustbetribbin

Well-Known Member
NWO4LIFE said:
Bro this entire post you made is justification of white privilege. I'm a hillbilly and even I can see that. it's a super easy situation to never repeat again. Never force anyone especially someone from a people that has had their hair be a major issue for superficial reasons to cut their hair especially in a forced way like that. It's real easy but some people just can't get it.
Click to expand...
Ignored.
 
NWO4LIFE

NWO4LIFE

Active Member
mustbetribbin said:
I see you are pulling for straws, your not going to get me to be quiet if I have something to say.

When you get a meaningful argument against me we can talk.

I'm going to be patient and allow others to speak for now understand? Thanks.
Click to expand...
am I on ignore or not?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
thank you for coming to the party..can i take your coat?..please leave the gift on the counter in the kitchen..shall we begin?

did you read my first sentence AFTER the title?

everyone suffers from racism including you to a degree.

yes, deliberately provocative to get people to think..jim crow is alive and well..they didn't just cut the neck area..it moved me as if he were MY son and i was HIS mother. no racism- just a mom looking at a child..this devastated me..if i could reach inside the YT, i would've grabbed those scissors and taken kirstjen nielsens eyes out. such a poor optic.

we still have thousands of votes sitting in opa-locka mail distribution.

desantis says he must now make laws that aren't defined on felon referendum which passed by and large.

it is fair to believe my title is accurate.
Click to expand...
Gillum is a bum because he lost just like Clinton did.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ChiefRunningPhist said:
I disagree but see your side.



It might be plausible or possible, or "fair" reasoning, but to judge before the facts are presented and the entire story is made public is not socially responsible, and further fans the flames of our current racial climate.

The fact that it's headline news across the country is an unequal or superfluous response and disintegrates the integrity of the "actual" racial discrimination argument which is derived from validated and more serious offenses. You disrespect the true victims and the true fight going on by not being disciplined in how and when you react and/or label things that may or may not be "racist".

Basically, its so IN right now to hate on racists. People are tainting the real situation with their social media need for attention and likes and their desire to be excepted.

That's my $0.02. The more I read about it the more its developing into a race related issue, but its hard to tell hype from news anymore and I'll give it a few days of investigation before I jump in with the "lord of the flies" type of conviction, which I think is happening here currently... I could be wrong but trying to be socially responsible.
Click to expand...
Umm. It is fashionable to not like racism? There are alternatives to this assertion, such as, 50 years after the civil rights act was enacted, institutional racism still favors white people and a majority of people think that's wrong.

As far as this example of racism is concerned, I'd prefer that it never happen again. How is kicking the issue under the rug going to end it? Are you tired of political correctness rhetoric? A lot of people are. Do you know what I'm more tired of? Racist shit like this. Do I have to be silent about my objections because other white people are tired of protests against racism?
 
Last edited:
blu3bird

blu3bird

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Umm. It is fashionable to not like racism? There are alternatives to this assertion, such as, 50 years after the civil rights act was enacted, institutional racism still favors white people and a majority of people think that's wrong.

As far as this example of racism is concerned, I'd prefer that it never happen again. How is kicking the issue under the rug isn't going to end it? Are you tired of political correctness rhetoric? A lot of people are. Do you know what I'm more tired of? Racist shit like this. Do I have to be silent about my objections because other white people are tired of protests against racism?
Click to expand...
It's almost like he's saying it's not ok to speak out against racism, I'm not understanding the point he's trying to make

I don't know, I'm out of work early for once and I'm going to drink tonight

I'm taking a power nap first though
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top