WeedSexWeightsShakes
Well-Known Member
anyone use these? Have a chance to get 4 lightly used ones for $500. Seems like a great deal.
Just looked them up ...
*pulling up a seat
anyone use these? Have a chance to get 4 lightly used ones for $500. Seems like a great deal.
I would be more concerned why someone is willing to get rid of them at a loss after a run or two?
I f you can get four 66's for $500 I would jump at it at $500 a piece on Amazon
no clue why you hesitate
I just started a cycle with the ray 22s only about two weeks in so I can’t speak on how well the light interact with the plant through a full cycle but they are feeding my sprouts pretty well. My advice is definitely get the dimmer. The wait time on them is about 7 weeks though so that unfortunate. Mine actually just came in today. Installing tonight.anyone use these? Have a chance to get 4 lightly used ones for $500. Seems like a great deal.
@Or_Gro you seen those scyence leds yet? Looks like you can change the spectrums? I thought this is something you would possibly be into. Maybe even @Randomblame
@Or_Gro how you liking this snow lol!?
I don’t know anything about scynce, looked them up: saw dragon 600 model looked over each channels’s spectrum and specs...imo, you can do better performance diy w qb 96e or 288s and supplemental blues and reds...i didn’t compare prices...ask tbone for his point of view...
This is a strange winter...we haven’t accumulated much, and it then melts during day....but 2 snowdays this month, so far...
Read a little more, that controller feature i didn’t see earlier... could put it in a better position than diy...would be worth digging into, to see what exactly you can do spectrum-wise.
But $2000, not worth it to me vs what i can already do...
@Or_Gro you seen those scyence leds yet? Looks like you can change the spectrums? I thought this is something you would possibly be into. Maybe even @Randomblame
@Or_Gro how you liking this snow lol!?
I would rather take the ray66‘s! I don't lelieve lenses do something useful. Yepp, they focus the light so you lost less light on the wall but in the same time they have only 95% transmission rate and you're forced to set a higher distance to avoid burnings. A light hiiting 2,43μMol/J with lenses would probably reach 2,55μMol/J without them.
And there is no penetration because of strong light, thats completely sense free. Diffuse light is what travels deeper into the canopy. They get better penetration because they use multiple light sources which are creating a more diffuse light thru multiple overlapping.
The ray66 can be used with 6" distance and I bet my bike you get higher readings and a better penetration at the recommended hanging height with 4 ray66 compared to one dragonXL. With such a low distance you really don't need lenses to avoid light loss! You could even turn the outer ray66's hanging next to the tent walls by 15-25° to direct the light on the canopy and away from the walls. This would reduce light loss even more and you still don't need a lens.
And for the price of one dragonXL you can get an Amare bar8(with rui discount). 2,7μMol/J, 880w max, +1700μMol/s PPF that's enough for a 5x 5' area and the degree of flexibility these light offers is simply amazing. You can splitt it even in half if you want or use a few bars as side lights. We have a thread about these light here in the LED area, btw..
Yeah I totally agree I just thought the spectrum adjusting seemed interesting.
I like the bar setups more too. Better spread for a better yield.
"since a while I'm using only 3k but a mix of CRI80 and 90 and my results speak for themself."
>you have found this combo better than none or added reds to cobs?
I don’t think he meant that, he adds supplementals to the whites...