If you're thinking about running a pair of 150HPS, take ballast losses and luminous output into consideration.
A 150 will draw about 180W out of the AC mains, so a pair of them draws about 360W. A 400HPS draws about 465W. But here's the difference that makes a difference: a 400 makes about 50,000 lumens, a 150 makes about 15,000. Since the lumen is a measure of intensity (brightness) and no lamp gets brighter by virtue of putting one lamp next to another, the luminous intensity from a pair of 150s is still 15K lumens. As you might expect, 50K lumens will have much better foliar penetration than 15K lm. You will get markedly better intensity and thus bud density and yield from a single 400. $119 will buy you a 400HPS lamp tube, ballast and reflector from HTG.
There is a such thing as false economy. You've surely spent more on CFLs, in drips and drabbles, than you would have spent on a 400. The 438W of CFLs is also making much more heat than a 400HPS and significantly less lm/W.
Adding CFLs to HPS is like adding a model airplane engine to your 747. Waste of time. Don't bother.
14ga will carry 15A max @ 120V. However, for safety, you should limit continuous loads to 80% of the max current rating- or less. Keep in mind that an HPS will need about 25% more current on startup (for about 15sec after striking the arc) than while running.
A 400HPS without a cooltube can be spaced about 300mm from leaves. Add a cooltube and it can be 100-150mm.