Recent Research Casts Doubt On Claim That Marijuana Is Harmful To Brain

gb123

Well-Known Member
Although marijuana is legal in some U.S. states and all of Canada, politicians continue to sometimes turn to the drug for blame. Most recently, the Dayton, Ohio mass shooting was blamed on marijuana and drag queens by Republican Ohio lawmaker Candice Keller.


Despite its hazy reputation, Truthout reports that recent research continues to debunk claims that marijuana harms the brain.



Marijuana was previously associated with lower cognitive functioning thanks to a 2012 study, which claimed that cannabis use in early adolescence was significantly associated with a decrease in IQ points — eight, in particular — by middle age. But a critique of the study suggested that the IQ decline was consistent with socioeconomic differences across those studied, and later, better-controlled studies reportedly failed to replicate the findings of the 2012 study.




A 2017 study by researchers at the University of Colorado examined the effect of marijuana exposure and alcohol ingestion on the structure of the brain in both adults and adolescents. The data suggested that while there is a connection between alcohol use severity and changes in lower brain matter in both adults and adolescents, no associations were found between such changes and “past 30-day cannabis use” in adults or adolescents.

The Truthout report ends with a call for a change in the approach to marijuana in the face of the facts.

“It is time for politicians to reject the unsubstantiated ‘reefer rhetoric’ and fear-mongering of the past and move forward to amend U.S. cannabis laws in response to the emerging science, public opinion and the plant’s rapidly changing cultural status.”
It appears that politicians may be catching on. Forbes reports 2018 as “The Year Politicians Realized People Love Cannabis Reform,” noting that both Illinois and Connecticut elected governors that year that were receptive to legalizing marijuana. In addition, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is “seriously debating” marijuana legalization in the state, where possession of small amounts is currently decriminalized.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Woups! I fear i may have broken a neuron or 2 just reading this...
any progress is a good thing, but we still have a long way to go. there are still way too many politicians who believe the outdated, inaccurate, biased "information" that was mostly released before there was any real research into cannabis or its effects on people.
it confirms what they privately think, so they hang onto it, even in the face of new information, that was obtained from actual experimentation and long term observation, and not anecdotal stories and personal "feelings"
 

Egzoset

Well-Known Member
Salutations,

Things are relatively simple when monochromatic, it's when the war obscures everyone's mutual interest in true Public Health that we know how miserably the whole chain of events went wrong since Victoria. I'm thinking about a recent article on heavy metals leaching in e-Cig atomizers: we should want this design analyzed and corrected if necessary, while the brave warriors will rather choose more prohibitionism via more ban.

Good day, have fun!! :peace:
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Salutations,

Things are relatively simple when monochromatic, it's when the war obscures everyone's mutual interest in true Public Health that we know how miserably the whole chain of events went wrong since Victoria. I'm thinking about a recent article on heavy metals leaching in e-Cig atomizers: we should want this design analyzed and corrected if necessary, while the brave warriors will rather choose more prohibitionism via more ban.

Good day, have fun!! :peace:
in light of recent health developments, i think vaping has a much bigger problem than heavy metal leeching....but your point is valid, and more research should have to go into product development that have potential health hazards
 
Last edited:

Egzoset

Well-Known Member
Hi,

Actually i fear the "vaping deaths" affair might have come with more global side-effects while i'd prefer we fix the problem instead of them. We respond to 3rd-party intrusions by justifying ourselves though the "harm" is from outside, preventing due R & D for example...
 
Top