What are you even talking about?What's 35 trillion - 32 trillion?
What does that even mean? So what if we spend x dollars on defense and y dollars on healthcare? They are spent on completely different objectives. Would it make sense to just cut healthcare willy nilly to pay for more bombs? Cutting defense spending is a completely different topic. Old Bob conflated to cost of military defense with healthcare costs in order to justify spending more on one or the other. What he just did is tells us age has caught up with them.
Is this going to add hearing to Medicare which currently doesn't? Or is it just like now, "yeah, our tests say you're deaf, that'll be $3,000 per ear, out of pocket, all on you, we won't pay jack!"3 trillion
Ensuring everyone has coverage is $3 trillion less than what we currently pay for healthcare that fails to cover 30 million Americans
That also ensures they have dental, eye, and ear coverage, too, and they're not forced to stay at a job they don't like, or stay in a relationship they don't like just to keep coverage, like they currently do. It also ensures they're not rationing medication or paying hundreds of times more than they should to buy necessary medication like insulin
No cost at the point of service for health, dental, eye, or hearing, like other modern first world countriesIs this going to add hearing to Medicare which currently doesn't? Or is it just like now, "yeah, our tests say you're deaf, that'll be $3,000 per ear, out of pocket, all on you, we won't pay jack!"
That's what I was told with Blue Cross, after paying $20 for the referral, and $35 for the specialist.
No cost at the point of service for health, dental, eye, or hearing, like other modern first world countries
You aren't going to pay for that. We know this already.3 trillion
Ensuring everyone has coverage is $3 trillion less than what we currently pay for healthcare that fails to cover 30 million Americans
That also ensures they have dental, eye, and ear coverage, too, and they're not forced to stay at a job they don't like, or stay in a relationship they don't like just to keep coverage, like they currently do. It also ensures they're not rationing medication or paying hundreds of times more than they should to buy necessary medication like insulin
Like I said, just for the hearing test, or the hearing aid too? Because Costco for the $60 membership fee gave me the same news, but wanted $2,500 per ear.No cost at the point of service for health, dental, eye, or hearing, like other modern first world countries
He's highlighting your feigned outrage over the cost of universal coverageWhat does that even mean?
Everything. It's an expansion of Medicare that covers everyone, not just 65+Like I said, just for the hearing test, or the hearing aid too? Because Costco for the $60 membership fee gave me the same news, but wanted $2,500 per ear.
This is what Medicare says, so what you say doesn't seem true with your M4A plan?
Things to know
Medicare doesn’t cover hearing exams, hearing aids, or exams for fitting hearing aids.
Hearing & balance exams
Have trouble hearing? Medicare's hearing exam coverage may be right for you. Use Medicare for diagnostic hearing & balancing exam costs. Learn more.www.medicare.gov
I'm confused. How can this expanded Medicare cover hearing aids, but a premium HMO like Kaiser doesn't that's more than what the M4A plan covers?Everything. It's an expansion of Medicare that covers everyone, not just 65+
That's a great idea. We should ensure everyone has coverage.3 trillion
Ensuring everyone has coverage is $3 trillion less than what we currently pay
It's already been explained to you how a system like Buttigieg is proposing fails from inception by having no way to fund the public part of the program as "those that want it" are poor people who can't afford private insurance and those that can won't subsidize the public option. You still haven't addressed that.That's a great idea. We should ensure everyone has coverage.
You should read about "Medicare for all who want it". Mayor Pete thinks it can be done for 1.5 trillion dollars in the first decade. That would be mostly paid for simply by repealing the Trump tax cuts to the rich.
Actually, I did. Your conclusion doesn't follow from your premise. You see, it's an expansion of medicare. Those uninsured or under-insured who want medicare will have it. Then they'll be covered. This expense will be then picked up by the federal budget. Everyone else can then keep their private plan. For example, I take a small tax hike (as opposed to that sanders idea where I give up two thirds of my income) and then I continue to provide myself with private insurance.It's already been explained to you how a system like Buttigieg is proposing fails from inception by having no way to fund the public part of the program as "those that want it" are poor people who can't afford private insurance and those that can won't subsidize the public option. You still haven't addressed that.
Meaning taxes go up, spending goes down, or debts are accruedThis expense will be then picked up by the federal budget.
The first two, not the third.Meaning taxes go up, spending goes down, or debts are accrued
So does Buttigieg plan on raising taxes, cutting spending, or increasing the debt/deficit to pay for his "Medicare for all who want it" plan?
If you don't like it, why don't you cut ties with America completely? Isn't that how you guys work? "Don't like it leave!" Well, you left, and are almost there.Actually, I did. Your conclusion doesn't follow from your premise. You see, it's an expansion of medicare. Those uninsured or under-insured who want medicare will have it. Then they'll be covered. This expense will be then picked up by the federal budget. Everyone else can then keep their private plan. For example, I take a small tax hike (as opposed to that sanders idea where I give up two thirds of my income) and then I continue to provide myself with private insurance.
Let me know if I used too many big words.
Nah, nothing you said interests me at all.If you don't like it, why don't you cut ties with America completely? Isn't that how you guys work? "Don't like it leave!" Well, you left, and are almost there.
Unless you have a student loan debt, just go up to any one of America's stronghold's, a consulate, and tell an official, "My name is Abondonconflict, and I renounce my citizenship." They'll try to convince you otherwise for about 15 minutes while they make you sign a few papers. Other than that, it's super easy.
Also, they won't really get rid of your citizenship completely, so you don't have to worry. If America finally becomes your own fanatical Utopia, just later come back and say you've changed your mind. They've always done it in the past.
But I personally think you're just a drama queen.
No more unfair American abroad taxes.