The Problems With Biden

abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I would love to read but I don't pay to read news, just on principal. cut and paste please
Click to expand...
Sure, no problem. Although I don't seem to have a pay wall for wapo. Anyway, I have to do it in more than one post because of the 1k word limit.
When Joe Biden was a freshman senator in the mid-1970s, his home state of Delaware, like other hotspots across the country, was engulfed in a bitter battle over school busing, debating whether children should be sent to schools in different neighborhoods to promote racial diversity.
Biden took a lead role in the fight, speaking out repeatedly and forcefully against sending white children to majority-black schools and black children to majority-white schools. He played down the persistence of overt racism and suggested that the government should have a limited role in integration.

“I do not buy the concept, popular in the ’60s, which said, ‘We have suppressed the black man for 300 years and the white man is now far ahead in the race for everything our society offers. In order to even the score, we must now give the black man a head start, or even hold the white man back, to even the race,’ ” Biden told a Delaware-based weekly newspaper in 1975. “I don’t buy that.”

In language that bears on today’s debate about whether descendants of slaves should be compensated, he added, “I don’t feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather. I feel responsible for what the situation is today, for the sins of my own generation. And I’ll be damned if I feel responsible to pay for what happened 300 years ago.”

Biden’s statements 44 years ago represent one of the earliest chapters in his well-documented record on racial issues, during which he generally has worked alongside African American leaders and been embraced by them. He supported the extension of the Voting Rights Act, amendments to the Fair Housing Act, sanctions against apartheid South Africa and the creation of a holiday honoring Martin Luther King Jr. In 2010, he pushed to roll back sentencing that many believed exacerbated racial disparities.

But Biden and civil rights leaders also have occasionally parted ways, and his career probably would be viewed through a new lens if he decides to run for president in a Democratic Party that has moved to the left and grown more ethnically diverse, even in the years since he was elected vice president.

African American voters are expected to play a pivotal role in the party’s nomination in 2020, and groups such as Black Lives Matter are pressing candidates to confront difficult questions about race. Although many civil rights leaders agree that busing did not play out in an ideal way, they often say it was a necessary effort, given that white-run school districts were doing little to integrate even 20 years after the Supreme Court’s 1954 landmark desegregation ruling in Brown v. Board of Education.

Cornell William Brooks, a former president of the NAACP, said in an interview that he has personal affection for Biden, but that he was taken aback upon being read portions of the 1975 interview.

“If you said something like that in 2019, there would be a response to that that would be pretty harsh,” said Brooks, a professor at the Harvard Kennedy School. “Having served as vice president to the first African American president in U.S. history, and given all that he’s seen in the intervening years, I would be stunned if he would stand behind that.”

Biden, 76, declined to be interviewed for this article. But his spokesman, Bill Russo, said the former vice president still believes he was right to oppose busing.
Click to expand...
The first half of the entirety of that wapo article.

 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
@londonfog
“He never thought busing was the best way to integrate schools in Delaware — a position which most people now agree with,” Russo said. “As he said during those many years of debate, busing would not achieve equal opportunity. And it didn’t.”

Russo said Biden has a distinguished history of working for civil rights and against segregation. As a young man, Russo said, Biden fought to desegregate a movie theater in Delaware, and worked as the only white employee at a largely black swimming pool.

“Joe Biden is today — and has been for more than 40 years in public life — one of the strongest and most powerful voices for civil rights in America,” Russo said. “His long commitment to civil rights has repeatedly been recognized by many of the most important civil rights organizations in America.”

Biden’s office provided a statement from Ralph G. Neas, former executive director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, who said: “We disagreed on busing . . . but I always looked to Biden as a leader in the field of civil rights in other critical areas.”
Beyond particular policies, Biden’s supporters say he has established trust with civil rights leaders and earned considerable goodwill from serving as vice president to the nation’s first black president.

But the 1975 interview highlights how the landscape has shifted since Biden entered national politics, capturing a Senate seat in 1972 at age 29.
Biden in recent years has expressed regret for several episodes in his past, such as what many women’s rights advocates considered his weak efforts in 1991, as Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, to protect Anita Hill after she accused Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. Biden also has voiced contrition for pushing a tough-on-crime bill in 1994 that many African Americans viewed as unfair and overly harsh.

Although civil rights leaders may object to Biden’s past statements about busing, his decision to stand by his views on the issue illustrate what some of his supporters think would be his advantage in the 2020 field: his ability to appeal beyond the Democratic base to some working-class white voters who voted for Donald Trump in 2016.

Biden, after all, was a vocal opponent of busing as the issue was raging nationwide — including in his hometown.
He wrote columns for local newspapers and pushed legislation requiring courts to consider solutions besides busing, often siding with conservatives such as Sen. Jesse Helms (N.C.), who welcomed Biden “to the ranks of the enlightened.”

Biden’s 1975 interview, which covered a range of topics, was conducted by a publication based in Newark, Del., referred to as the People Paper. It was printed in the Congressional Record at the request of Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho), who praised Biden’s comments, and went largely unnoticed thereafter. A Democrat who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic pointed out the original interview to The Washington Post, citing a concern that Biden’s positions could be problematic for the party.

In the interview, Biden dismissed government efforts to impose diversity in schools. “We’ve lost our bearings since the 1954 Brown vs. School Board desegregation case,” he said. “To ‘desegregate’ is different than to ‘integrate.’ . . . I am philosophically opposed to quota systems. They insure mediocrity.”

If anything, he said, it was busing plans that were racist.
“The new integration plans being offered are really just quota systems to assure a certain number of blacks, Chicanos, or whatever in each school. That, to me, is the most racist concept you can come up with,” Biden said. “What it says is, ‘In order for your child with curly black hair, brown eyes, and dark skin to be able to learn anything, he needs to sit next to my blond-haired, blue-eyed son.’ That’s racist! Who the hell do we think we are, that the only way a black man or woman can learn is if they rub shoulders with my white child?”

Russo said Biden’s argument was that everyone deserves the same opportunity. “Regardless of what Zip code you’re born in, you should be entitled to a good education,” he said. “That’s the point he’s making here.”

Biden’s election to the Senate came eight years after the Civil Rights Act was passed, at a time when states and cities nationwide were wrestling with how to handle segregated schools. Although the Supreme Court had declared segregation unconstitutional in 1954, many schools remained divided because their surrounding neighborhoods were racially monolithic. And majority-black schools generally had far fewer resources.

Courts ordered some cities to bus children across town to create a more balanced education system. But what black families called “integration” many white families called “forced busing,” complaining of long bus rides that severed the link between kids and their local schools. Violence over the issue broke out in cities such as Boston.
Click to expand...
Second half. Actually, looks like it still doesn't all fit, will have to be 3 posts. Lots to read.

 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
@londonfog
Against that backdrop, Biden, a rising political star, took aim at a 1974 court order directing Delaware to submit plans for desegregating Wilmington-area schools — an edict that was highly unpopular with many of his constituents.

Ultimately, Wilmington schools in 1978 implemented a plan merging one urban district with 10 suburban ones, and busing students so that they spend nine consecutive years in what had been a historically white school and three years in what had been a historically black school. By 1995 a federal court determined the schools were no longer segregated.

“The courts have gone overboard in their interpretation of what is required to remedy unlawful segregation,” Biden said in the 1975 interview. “It is one thing to say that you cannot keep a black man from using this bathroom, and something quite different to say that one out of every five people who use this bathroom must be black.”

Biden’s stance put him at odds with Sen. Edward Brooke (R-Mass.), the chamber’s only African American, who called one of Biden’s amendments “the greatest symbolic defeat for civil rights since 1964.”

Jeffrey A. Raffel, who was executive director of the Delaware Committee on the School Decision in the 1970s, said it was hard for any political leader in the state to be pro-busing at the time, given the public passions against it.

“The political situation there was poison in terms of supporting busing — it was really, really tough,” he said. “There were very few people going around saying, ‘Busing is a good thing, we should support busing.’ In that atmosphere, Biden was the center. How do you deal with that when 85 percent of your constituency is against it?”

Biden’s statements in the People Paper appear to be among his most aggressive on the subject.

"
I oppose busing. It’s an asinine concept, the utility of which has never been proven to me,” he said. “I’ve gotten to the point where I think our only recourse to eliminate busing may be a constitutional amendment.”

Biden recognized that such comments could prompt some to lump him in with racists. “The unsavory part about this is when I come out against busing, as I have all along, I don’t want to be mixed up with a George Wallace,” he said, referring to the segregationist governor of Alabama.

“The real problem with busing,” he said, was that “you take people who aren’t racist, people who are good citizens, who believe in equal education and opportunity, and you stunt their children’s intellectual growth by busing them to an inferior school . . . and you’re going to fill them with hatred.”

He contended that being bused, while bad for white students, hurts black children, too. An African American child is sent to a white school in a wealthy neighborhood, then “back to the ghetto. How can he be encouraged to love his white brothers? He doesn’t need a look at ‘the other side,’ he needs the chance to get out of the ghetto permanently,” Biden said.

Civil rights leaders have largely considered Biden a strong ally, but there have also been disputes, especially during his long tenure heading the Senate Judiciary Committee. When Biden chaired the 1991 confirmation hearings for Thomas, now a Supreme Court justice, Hill’s supporters criticized him for allowing her to be attacked and declining to allow witnesses who might have bolstered her account. Biden has said he owes Hill an apology.

At an event on Martin Luther King Jr. Day in January, Biden repeated earlier statements of regret for supporting tough-on-crime measures in the 1990s, which included provisions now widely considered racially discriminatory and at least partly responsible for current incarceration rates, in which African Americans are significantly over-represented.

“The bottom line is we have a lot to root out, but most of all the systematic racism that most of us whites don’t like to acknowledge even exists,” Biden said during a breakfast held by the Rev. Al Sharpton and the National Action Network. “We don’t even consciously acknowledge it. But it’s been built into every aspect of our system.”

Forty-four years earlier, Biden was challenged during the interview on whether he believed he was a liberal despite his anti-busing stance. He said that he was, and that he favored other ways to help African Americans, including more spending.

“It is true that the white man has suppressed the black man, and continues to suppress the black man. It is harder to be black than to be white,” Biden said. “But you have to open up avenues for blacks without closing avenues for whites; you don’t hold society back to let one segment catch up. You put more money into the black schools for remedial reading programs, you upgrade facilities, you upgrade opportunities, open up housing patterns. You give everybody a piece of the action.”
Click to expand...
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Exactly and people want me to vote for this POS. Hell no. He has not won not one primary race as of yet. I even put Yang about Old Fucking Slow Joe Biden. America can't do better than this ? really
Click to expand...
I'm surprised about how little people actually know about the busing issue. It was a big deal, there was even some violence over it. That was probably the biggest thing he's even known for. He was quite vociferous about it and people were still very much in the civil rights mindset. Black people had only been voting legally for a short time by then and he fought hard for his white constituents.

The least he can do is apologize for it. Instead, he thinks it will make him appeal to racists and bolster his chances since he already feels he has the black vote on lock.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
Then quit saying stupid shit like the:


You notice how everything you have posted is just little edits of what he has said, which removes all context outside of a sentence or two that after 50 years in public office. Everything you have posted about Biden has you all worked up, but it is weak ass shit if you take a few minutes longer to look at it.
Click to expand...
Funny how you took a comment I made in this thread and answered it in another thread. Actually, I copy pasted the entire article.

Instead of trying to troll me in your dishonesty thread, answer my comment where I made it, liar. I'm losing all respect for you and you're making a very strong case against Biden.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
If you look at your article, it was edited out comments by Biden mixed with the writers commentary. It wasn't a an entire speech.

I am sure I had to work really hard to get you to not take a breath to read what I wrote. Its a bummer you are plugging your eyes and ears to reality so hard in an effort to keep your hate alive.

And yeah I am not a fan of amplifying propaganda titles like that other one. So I will do what I do, at least until @rollitup or some other moderator tells me I am out of line.

I do find it funny you calling me a cultist though, good one.
Click to expand...
This is trolling. You are being a troll today.

If you're going to click reply to my comments just so you can copy the text and put it in another thread, then sure, you might be able to make the claim that I removed context. However, since I'm putting it back in this thread, where I actually commented, it's clear to see that I posted the entire text of the article, only a few posts back and it took three posts to do it and I even tagged OP @londonfog so don't be lying on me. And tagging @rollitup in another thread to make things out to be something they aren't. They know who I am, both of them have seen my dd214.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
This is trolling. You are being a troll today.

If you're going to click reply to my comments just so you can copy the text and put it in another thread, then sure, you might be able to make the claim that I removed context. However, since I'm putting it back in this thread, where I actually commented, it's clear to see that I posted the entire text of the article, only a few posts back and it took three posts to do it and I even tagged OP @londonfog so don't be lying on me. And tagging @rollitup in another thread to make things out to be something they aren't. They know who I am, both of them have seen my dd214.
Click to expand...
Ill post here in this propagandist thread title, because it seems to bother you, if you look though I actually said I was going to do that yesterday, but whatever.

You should relook that article you posted. Like I said (not out of context either) it is a entire article, but all the quotes of Biden are just clips surrounded by commentary of the writer. I have said, and will repeat early and often, to watch the actual speeches he does in their entirety and judge for yourself.

We are in a disinformation age, it is easy to cut paste a few lines here and there ignoring the rest of reality and make people seem really shitty. You're too smart for that shit.

I am going to go back to cut pasting back into the other thread because I really don't like bumping shittily titled threads attacking Democrats with the war that is going on with our elections.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
Ill post here in this propagandist thread title, because it seems to bother you, if you look though I actually said I was going to do that yesterday, but whatever.

You should relook that article you posted. Like I said (not out of context either) it is a entire article, but all the quotes of Biden are just clips surrounded by commentary of the writer. I have said, and will repeat early and often, to watch the actual speeches he does in their entirety and judge for yourself.

We are in a disinformation age, it is easy to cut paste a few lines here and there ignoring the rest of reality and make people seem really shitty. You're too smart for that shit.

I am going to go back to cut pasting back into the other thread because I really don't like bumping shittily titled threads attacking Democrats with the war that is going on with our elections.
Click to expand...
The paywall is a clear indication that it's real journalism. It's who Biden has always been and the reason he doesn't disavow it is because he hopes it will get him some of that "silent minority" old white guy vote. In fact, the argument could be made that it is part of the reason Obama picked him. He needed a dinosaur to show off in the south to get some of the white vote. Relax man, black people don't want to enslave you just because they're sick of racism.
 
Justin-case

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
The paywall is a clear indication that it's real journalism. It's who Biden has always been and the reason he doesn't disavow it is because he hopes it will get him some of that "silent minority" old white guy vote. In fact, the argument could be made that it is part of the reason Obama picked him. He needed a dinosaur to show off in the south to get some of the white vote. Relax man, black people don't want to enslave you just because they're sick of racism.
Click to expand...
So Biden will need a good running mate?

I like Hakeem Jeffries, actually not sure why he didn't run too.
 
Last edited:
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Justin-case said:
So Biden will need a good running mate?

I like Hakeem Jeffries, act not sure why he didn't run too.
Click to expand...
He's going to need a damned good running mate. He was supposed to be too old to run in 2016 which was apparently part of the reason Obama picked him. He'd be best off with a strong female, someone younger that could be like Hillary Clinton. Just my two pesos.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
The paywall is a clear indication that it's real journalism. It's who Biden has always been and the reason he doesn't disavow it is because he hopes it will get him some of that "silent minority" old white guy vote. In fact, the argument could be made that it is part of the reason Obama picked him. He needed a dinosaur to show off in the south to get some of the white vote. Relax man, black people don't want to enslave you just because they're sick of racism.
Click to expand...
I think in this fight more than "appealing to the better angels of our nature" is required, grab em by the nuts has its place too, as you're seeing play out in the house and senate! Joe does appeal to bigots and "old white guys", he would cut into Trump's base and Trump knows and fears it. I won't deny old Joe was a prick and his ideas on cannabis suck, but he is a somewhat normal human being! He does need a good running mate, someone younger like Harris would be good for his ticket. Remember, back in the Clinton era, Joe was on the left wing of the democratic party!

Polls might not impress some, but they are data and most people who want to be rid of Trump and the GOP will vote strategically and support those who they believe can win in 2020. Biden has the largest margin thus far and probably the longest down ballot coat tails too, the democrats need a mandate and the country needs to repudiate Trump and Trumpism. America faces an existential threat with Trump and now even the with GOP, if the democrats win you might not get exactly what you want, but at least you'll have your country and future back. Joe ain't about to bring back Jim Crow and minorities will have a big say in what the democrats do moving forward. If the democrats win you'll have responsible government by consensus, not by decree & tweet as it is now.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top