300$ light??

ÒÒlegilizeitÒÒ said:
Are you absolutely nuts? He does not need 512.5w of LED for that tiny closet! He doesn't even have CO2!
I am running almost that exact w/ft in my 4x4 (650w), but I have everything dialed in, including CO2 and RDWC.
I'm getting an average of probably 1200 ppfd spread (1800 at the center) probably 500-700 more than plants can handle with out co2 enrichment
That much light would be a waste of electricity for a closet grower
Click to expand...
i have to agree. 500 watts of leds is going to be a constant sunburn. Will be fine with a dimmer but i doubt you would ever turn it up.
That being said i would rather have 500 then the 250 you will be using. So i would buy a 500 and turn it down. way down.
 
ÒÒlegilizeitÒÒ said:
Totally right, but the top of the line lights have fairly similar umol/j output, where you can compare them using w/ft.
Obviously these numbers wouldn't be the same for lower efficiency LEDs
Click to expand...
Yes, and it can help op weed out the lower efficiency lights to zero in on the best lights within his budget. The reason I have a problem with watts per square foot is it doesn't take spectrum into account, or active vs passive cooling.

I take your point about comparing lights with similar performance though. I just suspect some of them will be too expensive.
 
getogrow said:
i have to agree. 500 watts of leds is going to be a constant sunburn. Will be fine with a dimmer but i doubt you would ever turn it up.
That being said i would rather have 500 then the 250 you will be using. So i would buy a 500 and turn it down. way down.
Click to expand...
Sounds like a waste of wattage lol
Veg at lowest setting, then 50-75% in flower? What's the point? Haha
IMO its best to get a light that at 100% power, perfectly illuminates the grow space.
I'd say 300-400w of LED with a dimmer for veg would be more than enough for the OP
 
ÒÒlegilizeitÒÒ said:
I think you are severely under estimating LEDS
That amount of light is only needed if you want to maximize CO2
Without an enriched environment, its much closer to 30 w/sq ft when you have high end LEDs to maximize your space
Click to expand...


I run a Gavita 1700e. Its no better than my 1000 Hortilux HID that Ive been using for over 20 years. I use the Gavita for veg, in a 4 x 4 area at 24 inches.
I use a 1000w/1700e from Seedlings - flowering. My seedlings never see less than 1000w HID. I grow big plants because of plant limits in an unfriendly state, in 20 gallon containers of Promix BX per plant. No less than 10g. 2-4 plants per light.
I also run DE Gavita 1150w.

Hortilux 1000w HOS is 1600umol.

Gavita 1700e is 1700umol.

Ushio SE 1000w HID is 2100umol, and will do a 5 x 5, but isnt as reliable as the Hortilux.
 
jimihendrix1 said:
To do a 2.5 x 5 right, you need 512.5w of the best LED diodes/Samsung/Osram.

I simply go by Gavitas guideline.

Their 1700e = 40.3w sq/ft, and is made to replace a 1000w HID in a 4 x 4 area.

HID needs 62.5w sq/ft

2.5 x 5=12.5 x 41w = 512.5w
Click to expand...
There are a lot of variables in this mess. You simply cannot compare a single source light bulb to a nice spread. A 1k hps will grow a 5x5 with no problems but you will have a hot spot in the middle and lower numbers around the edges. So your going to feed them according to the middle ones with the "sunburn". Works out great for us hps guys who are used to it but in real life the difference is stupid. If i wanted to perfect my setup with hps i would have to feed 3 different ratios under the same 5x5 area. (assuming there is no side light or supplemental light)
 
Hortilux says a 1000w HPS is good for a 4 x 4 area. Just because it will light a 5 x 5 doesnt make it optimal. Hortilux, and Gavita both say 4 x 4. Gavita says the 1700e is a Direct Replacement for a 1000w HID, in a 4 x 4 area. Not going by my opinion.
 
ÒÒlegilizeitÒÒ said:
Sounds like a waste of wattage lol
Veg at lowest setting, then 50-75% in flower? What's the point? Haha
IMO its best to get a light that at 100% power, perfectly illuminates the grow space.
I'd say 300-400w of LED with a dimmer for veg would be more than enough for the OP
Click to expand...
you think im wasteing watts :
jimihendrix1 said:
I run a Gavita 1700e. Its no better than my 1000 Hortilux HID that Ive been using for over 20 years. I use the Gavita for veg, in a 4 x 4 area at 24 inches.
Click to expand...
I love my led veg lights but gosh damn thats overkill :bigjoint: (its only overkill if its not working) Thats crazy though
 
jimihendrix1 said:
I run a Gavita 1700e. Its no better than my 1000 Hortilux HID that Ive been using for over 20 years. I use the gavita for veg, in a 4 x 4 area at 24 inches.
I use a 1000w/1700e from Seedlings - flowering. My seedlings never see less than 1000w HID. I grow big plants because of plant limits in an unfriendly state, in 20 gallon containers of Promix BX per plant. No less than 10g. 2-4 plants per light.
Click to expand...
Well you are wasting electricity in veg for sure unless you have co2
Here is the map for that ligh at 24" (higher than your light)
Screenshot_20210114-121251_YouTube.jpg
You are covering your girls in probably over 1000 PPFD of light across that entire 4x4
That is 65 DLI on a 18 hour day. Simple botany says cannabis can't absorb more than 60 DLI at the MAX, with CO2 enrichment. Anything over 45 DLI without CO2 levels at 1200 is completly pointless.

Point of the story, just because you are using an insane amount of wasted electricity, doesn't mean thats normal, or that you should reccomend that to others.

To achieve 45 DLI in veg, all you need is 700 PPFD.
Flower, that is about 1000 (your light is more than anyone should need for flower in a 4x4, even then, CO2 enrichment is almost needed)
 
The sun is 125w+ sq/ft at the equator, so I do not feel its a waste of electric ect. They get more than my measly 62w-sq/ft I supply inside. I also run 2x 34w, but run at 40w x Solacure UVA/B bulbs per 4 x 4 area at 24 inches.
Sun is 2600umol, and more if your in the Andes.

I have HUGE airflow. No CO2, but tremendous airflow. Temps around 82f.
 
jimihendrix1 said:
The sun is 125w+ sq/ft at the equator, so I do not feel its a waste of electric ect. They get more than my measly 62w-sq/ft I supply inside. I also run 2x 34w, but run at 40w x Solacure UVA/B bulbs per 4 x 4 area at 24 inches.
Sun is 2600umol, and more if your in the Andes.

I have HUGE airflow. No CO2, but tremendous airflow. Temps around 82f.
Click to expand...
Where are you getting wattage info for the sun? A watt is a measure of electricity, not light.
Comparing the sun to grow lights isn't really useful unless you're trying to figure out what spectrum to use, or whether to grow outdoors or indoors.
 
jimihendrix1 said:
The sun is 125w+ sq/ft at the equator, so I do not feel its a waste of electric ect. They get more than my measly 62w-sq/ft I supply inside. I also run 2x 34w, but run at 40w x Solacure UVA/B bulbs per 4 x 4 area at 24 inches.
Sun is 2600umol, and more if your in the Andes.

I have HUGE airflow. No CO2, but tremendous airflow. Temps around 82f.
Click to expand...
If your girls are not showing defs then its not "too much". imo
 
Jimbo the Gael said:
Where are you getting wattage info for the sun? A watt is a measure of electricity, not light.
Comparing the sun to grow lights isn't really useful unless you're trying to figure out what spectrum to use, or whether to grow outdoors or indoors.
Click to expand...
Comparing the sun to grow lights is exactly what the industry has been doing since we started. Thats how you make a grow light. Study the sun and incorporate that into the design. Its 2021 so we are far past that but not near as far as some think.
 
jimihendrix1 said:
The sun is 125w+ sq/ft at the equator, so I do not feel its a waste of electric ect. They get more than my measly 62w-sq/ft I supply inside. I also run 2x 34w, but run at 40w x Solacure UVA/B bulbs per 4 x 4 area at 24 inches.
Sun is 2600umol, and more if your in the Andes.

I have HUGE airflow. No CO2, but tremendous airflow. Temps around 82f.
Click to expand...
It doesn't really matter what you think.
Google it
Cannabis can't absorb more than around 1000 ppfd in flower, and 700 ppfd in veg
Have you done any research on DLI?
You have to average the suns output at the equator for example. It may be over 2000 ppfd, but it is sometimes cloudy, there is shade from other trees, ext.
The maximum the equator ever sees is 60 DLI

Airflow has nothing to do with co2 enrichment besides giving the plants a fresh supply of whats there. If the room is 500 ppm co2, it doesn't matter how much air flow you have, your limiting factor is still that 500 ppm of co2

Please do some research on the science behind max PPFD in relation to CO2 levels and maximum DLI for cannabis
It will make you a better grower
 
ÒÒlegilizeitÒÒ said:
Well I certainly wouldn't compare the Spiderfarmer to a kia lol
Hid is more like a Ford model T
And the spiderfarmer is a 1500 pickup lol

For example, for me, my Spiderfarmer is replacing my $200 1000w HID light that cost me $850 a year to run with all the needed extra ventilation. Plus atleast $100 a year in bulbs that need to be replaced.
My $570 SF4000 replaces that, using only
$370 a year
Thats pretty easy math, thats $580 in savings, in one year, more than it costs to buy my LED, brand new, all over again for free
Click to expand...
You are replacing 1000 watt HID with a 450 watt Spider Farmer? In a 4x4 that only 28 watts per square foot. Don't you feel that is a bit underpowered? I am running 630 watts at full strength in my 4x4 which is what I replaced my 1000 watt HID with. Just curious.
 
getogrow said:
If your girls are not showing defs then its not "too much". imo
Click to expand...
I disagree.
You give your plants 25 DLI for minimum "optimal" growth.
You give them 45 DLI for maximum "optimal" growth
You can pump it up to 60 DLI, and they may not show adverse reactions, but they still won't grow any faster than at 45 DLI without CO2
All you are doing is using more electricity, for the same output.
 
getogrow said:
Comparing the sun to grow lights is exactly what the industry has been doing since we started. Thats how you make a grow light. Study the sun and incorporate that into the design. Its 2021 so we are far past that but not near as far as some think.
Click to expand...
That's kind of what I'm saying. Trying to copy the spectrum of the sun is fine, but every time we try to match the intensity we end up with crispy plants.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top