Will You Take The Vaccine?

Are you going to take the corona virus vaccine?

  • No.

  • Yes.


Results are only viewable after voting.

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
An overview of the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of face masks.
1. Studies on the effectiveness of face masks
So far, most studies found little to no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks in the general population, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.
  1. A May 2020 meta-study on pandemic influenza published by the US CDC found that face masks had no effect, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control. (Source)
  2. A Danish randomized controlled trial with 6000 participants, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine in November 2020, found no statistically significant effect of high-quality medical face masks against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a community setting. (Source)
  3. A large randomized controlled trial with close to 8000 participants, published in October 2020 in PLOS One, found that face masks “did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection.” (Source)
  4. A February 2021 review by the European CDCfound no significant evidence supporting the effectiveness of non-medical and medical face masks in the community. Furthermore, the European CDC advised against the use of FFP2/N95 masks by the general public. (Source)
  5. A July 2020 review by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks against virus infection or transmission. (Source)
  6. A November 2020 Cochrane review found that face masks did not reduce influenza-like illness (ILI) cases, neither in the general population nor in health care workers. (Source)
  7. An April 2020 review by two US professors in respiratory and infectious disease from the University of Illinois concluded that face masks have no effect in everyday life, neither as self-protection nor to protect third parties (so-called source control). (Source)
  8. An article in the New England Journal of Medicine from May 2020 came to the conclusion that face masks offer little to no protection in everyday life. (Source)
  9. A 2015 study in the British Medical Journal BMJ Open found that cloth masks were penetrated by 97% of particles and may increase infection risk by retaining moisture or repeated use. (Source)
  10. An August 2020 review by a German professorin virology, epidemiology and hygiene found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of face masks and that the improper daily use of masks by the public may in fact lead to an increase in infections. (Source)
Development of cases after mask mandates
In many states, coronavirus infections strongly increased after mask mandates had been introduced. The following charts show the typical examples of Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, the UK, California and Hawaii. Furthermore, a direct comparison between US states with and without mask mandates indicates that mask mandates have made no difference.

https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/
I decided to look at the next couple, both basically state that they have shit data and totally uncontrollable environments.


This is what the problem is with the trolling (foreign and domestic), it is very dangerous and never can be trusted to not need to have to chase your tail down some rabbit hole that people end up out of their depth trying to figure out, while trolls make it impossible to see through the noise.

At this point half those articles that you are pointing to as proof have not said that real masks are ineffective.
Because I don’t want an experimental injection I am automatically a Trump supporter? Wow.
I love the trumped up language 'experimental' while snow flaking about being trolled after pushing the bullshit conclusions in your click bait cut and paste 'credible sources' spam.

They can say I have to get it. Nobody is going to make me get it.

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Article 6 – Consent

1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice
Nobody is going to force you to take a vaccine, in this you are factually correct.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Don't bother. Letting these people steep in their epistemological cesspool makes the world better by shortening their lives. I am in favor of Trumpism that kills Trumpers. Unfortunately, it often kills others too.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
So this is a thread for only those who want to be vaxxed? Alternate opinions are not allowed?
It's called, will you take the vaccine, you won't and have natural Nugent immunity. Opinions are like rights, they who dare to defend them and can, have them. Your opinions are wrong and your motives and intentions are suspect, this has been demonstrated repeatedly on this thread and is documented.

I'll argue with honest, honorable people, you are neither, so my hand will be turned against you, but it was always your choice.
 

FresnoFarmer

Well-Known Member
I decided to look at the next couple, both basically state that they have shit data and totally uncontrollable environments.




This is what the problem is with the trolling (foreign and domestic), it is very dangerous and never can be trusted to not need to have to chase your tail down some rabbit hole that people end up out of their depth trying to figure out, while trolls make it impossible to see through the noise.

At this point half those articles that you are pointing to as proof have not said that real masks are ineffective.

I love the trumped up language 'experimental' while snow flaking about being trolled after pushing the bullshit conclusions in your click bait cut and paste 'credible sources' spam.


Nobody is going to force you to take a vaccine, in this you are factually correct.
Trumped up? The NIH calls it that as a matter of fact. Not “credible” to you?

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/experimental-coronavirus-vaccine-highly-effective
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
So this is a thread for only those who want to be vaxxed? Alternate opinions are not allowed?
You don't have to, but if nothing else, it's for people that are considerate of others. Realize that almost every law we have, is due to someone being inconsiderate of someone else, and every law takes away freedom. Think about two people living identical lives, but one person lives somewhere with zero laws and simply chooses what's right, then the other lives in a place where they're forced to do what's right. Two people doing the exact same things, but who do you think is happier? You come off super inconsiderate and inconsiderate people are the reason why more laws are created everyday and we lose freedom everyday. Understand the connection between your rights and a consideration for others, because the former doesn't last without the latter.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
How did you glean that from my statement? Name callings good for you.
I used to work in a hospital and protected myself from getting infected by people with communicable diseases. Now, if there was no information out there for families on how the covid virus is transmitted and that adults can get it from their children and what to do to protect yourself when caring for their child I would think differently. But that is not the case, is it? So since you have had first hand experience with the virus why would you think the rest of us that have not would want to contract it?

To think differently would mean you are not only a fool but an asshole, dick, or any other name you find offensive.

You are just a wast of space here - ignore. (only the second person I bothered to)
 
Top