UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Zdo you jerk off to ashli babbit? I do. I cum when she starts choking on her own blood
January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.
- Thread starter hanimmal
- Start date
CatHedral
Well-Known Member
No. We should not use Klan methods.
Let’s instead watch the legitimate judicial process grind them to paste.
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
you can't execute for high treason, sedition, or insurrection since 1998 apparently...but the penalties go up to life in prison...
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim
probably the scariest part in there for trump and the republican traitors is "and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States"
CatHedral
Well-Known Member
I am opposed to executing, period.
Life without parole will do just fine.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Trump Lawyers Falsely Claim in Court Filing that FBI & Senate Committee Cleared Trump Re: Jan 6
In connection with Donald Trump's lawsuit trying to prevent the National Archives form turning over potentially damning evidence, Trump lawyers just filed a brief falsely suggesting that both the FBI and a Senate Committee have cleared him of all wrongdoing in connection with the insurrection.
First, the presiding judge, Tanya Chutkan, undoubtedly will press Trump's lawyers on these false claims.
Second, although the FBI generally does not comment on pending investigations, this false assertion of exoneration should be addressed by the FBI, as FBI silence will be interpreted as affirmation of Trump's false claims.
Third, there are serious consequences should the Department of Justice fail to charge Donald Trump for his crimes in connection with the insurrection.
In connection with Donald Trump's lawsuit trying to prevent the National Archives form turning over potentially damning evidence, Trump lawyers just filed a brief falsely suggesting that both the FBI and a Senate Committee have cleared him of all wrongdoing in connection with the insurrection.
First, the presiding judge, Tanya Chutkan, undoubtedly will press Trump's lawyers on these false claims.
Second, although the FBI generally does not comment on pending investigations, this false assertion of exoneration should be addressed by the FBI, as FBI silence will be interpreted as affirmation of Trump's false claims.
Third, there are serious consequences should the Department of Justice fail to charge Donald Trump for his crimes in connection with the insurrection.
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
2 federal judges are poised to quietly begin unlocking reams of Jan. 6 secrets for Congress
The information, from Donald Trump's White House files and from the rioters themselves, could dramatically reshape the public’s understanding of the insurrection.
Read in POLITICO: https://apple.news/Am7nAAPoeSxWc-_cwJQZdpA
The information, from Donald Trump's White House files and from the rioters themselves, could dramatically reshape the public’s understanding of the insurrection.
Read in POLITICO: https://apple.news/Am7nAAPoeSxWc-_cwJQZdpA
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
She kinda looks like Hilary, it would be fun to see Trump before her, his base would think it's Hilary getting her revenge on Donald. There are a few judges in DC who have taken a dim view of the insurrection and I figure they will throw the book at any organizers or instigators. Assuming Garland charges anybody other than the pawns, it would be hard to avoid going to the very top with so many fingers pointing and tongues wagging. I'm guessing he's waiting for the committee to finish it's report, a grand jury to indict and more people squeal. Also NY state must be getting close taking action against Trump, his company and his family. One day he's going to have to explain why he didn't indict individual #1 on that slam dunk Stormy Daniels case with Cohen doing time for it.
printer
Well-Known Member
"The only remaining question, Eisen said, is whether the D.C. Circuit of the federal Appeals Court, and even potentially the Supreme Court, will permit a ruling against Trump to stand without a lengthy review. How those courts respond may be one of the most crucial moments in the success of the Jan. 6 committee.
“I would say that the decision of Judge Chutkan and of the appellate courts — that I predict will give the back of the hand to Trump’s argument — and the timing of those decisions, are the most consequential outside factors for the committee’s functioning,” he said"
Two court appeals afterward and the Republicans will be in power of the House and Senate with the investigation killed before it sees the light of day.
she gets jail.
apnews.com
Rioter who bragged she wouldn't go to jail gets prison term
A Texas real estate agent who bragged she wasn’t going to jail for storming the U.S. Capitol because she is white, has blond hair and good job has been sentenced to two months behind bars.
apnews.com
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
60 days is a fucking joke, they give more to second offense drunk drivers, ffs. she should have gotten at least 11-29...the most they can give you in county jail, they give you more than that, you're going to the penshe gets jail.
Rioter who bragged she wouldn't go to jail gets prison term
A Texas real estate agent who bragged she wasn’t going to jail for storming the U.S. Capitol because she is white, has blond hair and good job has been sentenced to two months behind bars.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Federal Judge Chutkan Destroys Arguments by Donald Tump's Lawyer on Executive Privilege.
Donald Trump filed a lawsuit trying to prevent information about his possible role in the insurrection from being provided to the House select committee investigating the attack on the US Capitol. In today's court hearing, Judge Tanya Chutkan dismantled each and every argument Trump's lawyer, Justin Clark, made in his desperate attempt to stop the House select committee from getting what is very likely damaging information about Trump's role in the insurrection. This video reviews today's court hearing and discusses what is likely to come next after Judge Chutkan issues her ruling in the coming days.
Donald Trump filed a lawsuit trying to prevent information about his possible role in the insurrection from being provided to the House select committee investigating the attack on the US Capitol. In today's court hearing, Judge Tanya Chutkan dismantled each and every argument Trump's lawyer, Justin Clark, made in his desperate attempt to stop the House select committee from getting what is very likely damaging information about Trump's role in the insurrection. This video reviews today's court hearing and discusses what is likely to come next after Judge Chutkan issues her ruling in the coming days.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Merrick Garland under fire for dragging his feet on Steve Bannon indictment: CNN
According to a report from CNN political analyst Chris Cillizza, Attorney General Merrick Garland is coming under increasing fire for not handing down a criminal indictment against former Donald Trump White House adviser Steve Bannon over two weeks after the House voted on a criminal referral.It...
www.rawstory.com
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
...what i say?....gtfo the pot and start DOING SOMETHINGMerrick Garland under fire for dragging his feet on Steve Bannon indictment: CNN
According to a report from CNN political analyst Chris Cillizza, Attorney General Merrick Garland is coming under increasing fire for not handing down a criminal indictment against former Donald Trump White House adviser Steve Bannon over two weeks after the House voted on a criminal referral.It...
printer
Well-Known Member
Politics and justice does not move fast.
CatHedral
Well-Known Member
Even so, this is (figuratively) a trial.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Jeffrey Clark Violates Congressional Subpoena but w/Steve Bannon Still Unindicted, Will it Matter?
Former Department of Justice official Jeffrey Clark, one of the people who joined Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the presidential election, appeared pursuant to a House select committee subpoena but refused to testify. Although Representative Bennie Thompson, Chairman of the select committee, promised aggressive action to enforce the subpoena, the committee is being hamstrung by the DOJ.
Steven Bannon was referred for prosecution more than two weeks ago but the DOJ has thus far refused to indict Bannon for the crime he inarguably committed - contempt of Congress. Every day the DOJ declines to indict Steve Bannon is another day they undercut Congress's authority and ability to investigate the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. Additionally, every day the DOJ neglects to indict Steve Bannon is another day they encourage witnesses - Jeffrey Clark, Mark Meadows and others - to defy Congressional subpoenas.
Former Department of Justice official Jeffrey Clark, one of the people who joined Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the presidential election, appeared pursuant to a House select committee subpoena but refused to testify. Although Representative Bennie Thompson, Chairman of the select committee, promised aggressive action to enforce the subpoena, the committee is being hamstrung by the DOJ.
Steven Bannon was referred for prosecution more than two weeks ago but the DOJ has thus far refused to indict Bannon for the crime he inarguably committed - contempt of Congress. Every day the DOJ declines to indict Steve Bannon is another day they undercut Congress's authority and ability to investigate the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. Additionally, every day the DOJ neglects to indict Steve Bannon is another day they encourage witnesses - Jeffrey Clark, Mark Meadows and others - to defy Congressional subpoenas.
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
fucking exactly...Merrick needs to get the fucking show on the road, and the first act should be nailing bannon's ass to the wall with dull nails