SCOTUS solidifies the right to carry weapons, shall not be infringed

FredH

Well-Known Member

The Supreme Court on Thursday handed down its opinion in a landmark Second Amendment rights case, the biggest win for gun rights since the court's Heller ruling holding that "New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense."
 

FredH

Well-Known Member
Klantard? You are one miserable excuse for garbage if you don't think rights are important. Has nothing to do with Trump either.
 

Rurumo

Well-Known Member
This court is the worst, handing down this ruling immediately before the biggest gun safety package in decades gets passed. Don't tell me this court isn't the most activist and political court in history. Yet everyone in favor of this insanity ignores the "well regulated militia" aspect of the 2nd amendment-what exactly is well regulated about letting everyone walk around with a gun, with no training and no license? And where is the militia? I would think it would look something like our State National Guard... Now they open up yet another state to unlimited concealed carry. The same thing will happen in New York, that has happened in EVERY SINGLE red state that has allowed this-it will be a blood bath. Gun crimes skyrocket when states allow anyone to carry a gun. All you have to do is look at road rage stats to understand why-a good portion of the population are overall decent law abiding citizens who have impulse control issues. Add firearms into the mix, and now these "good people" have a gun at hand when they lose it, and we've seen in Texas and many other RED states, they will reach for that gun IF IT IS NEARBY, for the most petty arguments with their neighbors. There is a massive influx of brand new offenders with no previous criminal record in every state that allows anyone to carry a gun. Don't forget that 20% of the population has a serious mental illness and just a tiny fraction of those people are getting help for it, and are in the system-and even fewer have the paperwork in the system that says they aren't allowed to carry a gun.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
All people have the right to defend themselves, no people have the right to use guns to take away guns from otherwise peaceful people. That would be highly illogical, which is why a liberal might like it.

I have a large gun and many people envy my skill with it.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member

The Supreme Court on Thursday handed down its opinion in a landmark Second Amendment rights case, the biggest win for gun rights since the court's Heller ruling holding that "New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense."
END THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL FILIBUSTER AND PASS BILLS THAT HAVE BEEN WAITING!
 
Last edited:

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
All people have the right to defend themselves, no people have the right to use guns to take away guns from otherwise peaceful people. That would be highly illogical, which is why a liberal might like it.

I have a large gun and many people envy my skill with it.
Rob, that was statement was illogical, especially considering that most "Liberals" don't want to take away guns, they just fucking want more control over the type of gun allowed & more control over who the fuck can own them

That's it

I own a multitude of weapons that I have used for hunting & skeet shooting & I'm sure as fuck a liberal.

If I have to give up my guns to help to prevent murders, I will give them gladly.

So, you have a big gun & are good with it"

Cool

How good & what gun?

Did you ever hear the term "chasing holes"?

It means hitting a target with 3 or more rounds leaving only one hole

I've done it a few times @ 300 yards with the right conditions (little or no wind) with my favorite rifle, a Sako chambered .270 Winchester with a Leupold 12x.

I would love to go to a range with you & show you that not all Liberals hate guns.

I love them :)
 
Last edited:

Sir Napsalot

Well-Known Member
Rob, that was statement was illogical, especially considering that most "Liberals" don't want to take away guns, they just fucking want more control over the type of gun allowed & more control over who the fuck can own them

That's it

I own a multitude of weapons that I have used for hunting & skeet shooting & I'm sure as fuck a liberal.

If I have to give up my guns to help to prevent murders, I will give them gladly.

So, you have a big gun & are good with it"

Cool

How good & what gun?

Did you ever hear the term "chasing holes"?

It means hitting a target with 3 or more rounds leaving only one hole

I've done it a few times @ 300 yards with the right conditions (little or no wind) with my favorite rifle, a Sako chambered .270 Winchester with a Leupold 12x.

I would love to go to a range with you & show you that not all Liberals hate guns.

I love them :)
I was the president of an NRA affiliated gun club for 3 years- Peter DeFazio was a member
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member

The Supreme Court on Thursday handed down its opinion in a landmark Second Amendment rights case, the biggest win for gun rights since the court's Heller ruling holding that "New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense."
You'll shoot your eye out.....
 
Top