Flushing

[Nope_49595933949]

If you want, I can give you the name of the doctor with a PhD in Plant Molecular Physiology with an emphasis on plant senescence who made the claim and you can write him and ask for him to cite his research. Will you post it here if you do?

To me, it made enough sense to change my mind about it. You've got guys cutting lights for 72 hours, revegging for a week before harvest, throwing ice, etc., yet stressing the plant out by making it realize its life is about to end sounds like complete nonsense, right?

Post his info I'll reach out and post it here.

 

[Lenin1917]

Nobody is actually debating this. It’s settled science that at best it does nothing, at worst it gives your plants a nutrient deficiency.

 

[ec121]

Post his info I'll reach out and post it here.

Cool. If you want, you can listen to the podcast he did. It's about 14 minutes in, but I found much of it interesting.

 

[twentyeight.threefive]

If you want, I can give you the name of the doctor with a PhD in Plant Molecular Physiology with an emphasis on plant senescence who made the claim and you can write him and ask for him to cite his research. Will you post it here if you do?

To me, it made enough sense to change my mind about it. You've got guys cutting lights for 72 hours, revegging for a week before harvest, throwing ice, etc., yet stressing the plant out by making it realize its life is about to end sounds like complete nonsense, right?

Instead of just claiming some doctorate claimed it, why wouldn’t you just post his info and cite where he said it?

Everything you’ve listed at the bottom of that post is bro science.

 

[xtsho]

Speaking of flushing, noodles sound good right now.

 

[Nope_49595933949]

Cool. If you want, you can listen to the podcast he did. It's about 14 minutes in, but I found much of it interesting.

I'd rather speak directly to him, can you not provide his contact info?

 

[twentyeight.threefive]

Cool. If you want, you can listen to the podcast he did. It's about 14 minutes in, but I found much of it interesting.

Cool. I could post something else from another doctorate saying flushing does nothing.

Both mean nothing without a scientific study behind it.

 

[Nope_49595933949]

I found his contact information, I'll update if he responds.

 

[twentyeight.threefive]

I'd rather speak directly to him, can you not provide his contact info?

Shoot him a message on LinkedIn. Let us know what he says.

Daniel Maida Hayden Ph.D. - Extractioneering | LinkedIn

While I appreciate your interest in connecting, that feature is reserved for 'In Real… · Experience: Extractioneering · Education: University of Hawaii at Manoa · Location: Ashland · 318 connections on LinkedIn. View Daniel Maida Hayden Ph.D.’s profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1...

www.linkedin.com

 

[Nope_49595933949]

Shoot him a message on LinkedIn. Let us know what he says.

Daniel Maida Hayden Ph.D. - Extractioneering | LinkedIn

While I appreciate your interest in connecting, that feature is reserved for 'In Real… · Experience: Extractioneering · Education: University of Hawaii at Manoa · Location: Ashland · 318 connections on LinkedIn. View Daniel Maida Hayden Ph.D.’s profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1...

www.linkedin.com

Yep, that's how I reached out to him.

 

[xtsho]

A youtube channel schilling for FOOP nutrients?

"Proud partner of FOOP Nutrients! Certified organic nutrients, NEW VEG PACK, clone gel and more! Visit www.foopcanna.com and use code growcast15 for 15% off- try the FOOP sweetener and experience the amazing flavor THE FOOP brings! *"

Only $25 for a quart of sugar water.

• DELIVERS EIGHT ORGANIC SUGARS – Unique blend of organic sugars sourced from the most exotic places on the planet: date syrup, sorghum syrup, agave syrup, coconut sugar, blackstrap molasses, honey, muscovado sugar, and yacon root

The guys credibility is questionable just by appearing on that channel.

 

[blueberrymilkshake]

 

[ec121]

Cool. I could post something else from another doctorate saying flushing does nothing.

Both mean nothing without a scientific study behind it.

True. I'd imagine in order to do a dissertation on the effects of senescence on a plant, he has some science behind it and not just being a bro. On the other hand, he has an extraction business. On the other hand again, these claims were not used in a way that asserted that his products are better than others. When the host found out his specialty was in senescence, he asked him about flushing and that is what led to that.

 

[ec121]

I found his contact information, I'll update if he responds.

Thanks.

 

[twentyeight.threefive]

True. I'd imagine in order to do a dissertation on the effects of senescence on a plant, he has some science behind it and not just being a bro. On the other hand, he has an extraction business. On the other hand again, these claims were not used in a way that asserted that his products are better than others. When the host found out his specialty was in senescence, he asked him about flushing and that is what led to that.

Have you read his dissertation on the effects of senescence of a plant? Again, claims can be made by anyone.

What relevance does him owning an extraction business have to do with the conversation? None.

 

[ec121]

Have you read his dissertation on the effects of senescence of a plant? Again, claims can be made by anyone.

No. Everything he said seems reasonable enough to me. To date, there aren't any scientific studies that assert flushing has no molecular effect, so we each have to pick which we choose.

What relevance does him owning an extraction business have to do with the conversation? None.

You know what the phrase "on one hand x but on the other hand y" means?

I was suggesting that he could be fabricating because he has a business to protect. However, in the context it was brought up and discussed, it had nothing to do with his business and was a side discussion when the host found out about his specialty in senescence, so I think he's being genuine and not sheisty. You are free to think he's just an idiot, though; there are plenty of PhD's who are.

 

[PJ Diaz]

If you lower EC at the end of flowering, the plant will uptake more water, potentially resulting in increased bud swell. Science bros.

 

[xtsho]

I remember about 15 years ago people were flushing with sucanat claiming it sweetened the buds. People were just buying it at the store and mixing it with water themselves. Then the nutrient companies moved in seeing a cash cow and started putting a few pennies worth of different sugars in bottles and selling it to people that didn't know any better.

I can't take anything seriously that comes from some youtube channel where the host is schilling bottles of sugar water. PhD doesn't mean anything once these guys decide to get in on the cannabis cash grab. Just look at that Harley dude schilling for RAW convincing people that 2 oz of a chemical salt is worth $14.95 when anyone can go buy pounds of the same stuff for less.

I didn't watch any of that video. I looked at the description and once I read that FOOP nonsense I closed the browser window.

 

[ec121]

PhD doesn't mean anything once these guys decide to get in on the cannabis cash grab. Just look at that Harley dude schilling for RAW convincing people that 2 oz of a chemical salt is worth $14.95 when anyone can go buy pounds of the same stuff for less.

How would informing people that flushing forces a plant into senescence and increases monoterpenes benefit a business that sells extracts when he never said flushing is what makes his product better? He is selling no products to growers and growers are the only people that flush or not flush.

I didn't watch any of that video. I looked at the description and once I read that FOOP nonsense I closed the browser window.

What do the advertisers of a program have to do with a guest? Are you asserting that anyone that goes on to the Tonight Show should scope out the companies who advertise first?

Lot of jaded people here, lmao.

 

[Coldnasty]

Hi folks
I'm hearing so many different opinions on the best way to finish/flush so I thought I would ask the question on here.
What gives the best results?
1. Plain Water
2. A Flushing agent like CAnna Flush.
3. A finisher/flush like Nano 10 flusher.

I bought some Nano 10 but literally don't want to ruin things so close to the finish line.

Thanks in advance.
[/QUOTE

Hi folks
I'm hearing so many different opinions on the best way to finish/flush so I thought I would ask the question on here.
What gives the best results?
1. Plain Water
2. A Flushing agent like CAnna Flush.
3. A finisher/flush like Nano 10 flusher.

I bought some Nano 10 but literally don't want to ruin things so close to the finish line.

Thanks in advance.

I still flush and I don’t care what anyone says. I’ve tested both myself in my conditions and I can tell a difference in the end product.

Nobody is actually debating this. It’s settled science that at best it does nothing, at worst it gives your plants a nutrient deficiency.

I don’t think it’s settled science at all. The one study from RX everyone is citing pretty much says there is a negligible difference in the end product. First off this study wasn’t rigorous enough to hang your hats on like you guys are. I don’t pour gallons of water down my pots but I do water with plain water the last few weeks. I have done both and I can two the difference. I’m no scientist but if you grow with salts there is a noticeable difference in the end product. My opinion it goes without saying.