Examples of GOP Leadership

[cannabineer]

But I did, in plain text. And it's a compliment to you that it need not be spoken plainly. I'm in no trap, I am no prisoner. All I need to do is leave you with the answer you asked for with no response by you to it and the lie you told to get it. I'm totally fine with that, really.

Quote it and bold the question.

 

[ActionianJacksonian]

You ain't paying for sh*t. These are womens rights. The removal of basic personal rights between a woman and her dr is not sitting well with the majority of women, they may have poked a sleeping dragon.

But I do pay for it. I've been to the women's center in California before. The rubbers kinda suck. Kill your babies, I don't care. Pay for it yourself or stock my gun cabinet.

 

[ActionianJacksonian]

Quote it and bold the question.

I'm good just gonna go with the AI conclusion in "War Games" here. Good movie.

Edit* since the wordsmith needs plain statements: statement of ignorance = what is that? So there is no question to bold. This is not 4d chess my dude it's just you spilling liquor all over the board knocking pieces over.

 

[doublejj]

But I do pay for it. I've been to the women's center in California before. The rubbers kinda suck. Kill your babies, I don't care. Pay for it yourself or stock my gun cabinet.

Ok, if I get to decide what's in your gun cabinet.

 

[cannabineer]

I'm good just gonna go with the AI conclusion in "War Games" here.

As I predicted: Humility is too painful for you. I wager there never was a question. Such are quickly recognizable in written English by the transposition of subject and verb.

 

[hanimmal]

You think so but you will never fully project womanhood, no matter what. When you realize this you will likely go to a very dark place.

That is cool, I dont even try.

It must suck though when peopel see your bitch tits walking around hiding your calfs with all your sex club buddies wearing your bumble bee suits that it isnt as easy for them to tell.

But I do pay for it. I've been to the women's center in California before. The rubbers kinda suck. Kill your babies, I don't care. Pay for it yourself or stock my gun cabinet.

Oh is that why you troll, to get those bicoin to pay for a new gun?

 

[CunningCanuk]

Vote progressive with me in November so we can protect pregnant men from climate discrimination.

 

[cannabineer]

I'm good just gonna go with the AI conclusion in "War Games" here. Good movie.

Edit* since the wordsmith needs plain statements: statement of ignorance = what is that? So there is no question to bold. This is not 4d chess my dude it's just you spilling liquor all over the board knocking pieces over.

Looking back, you deployed the question mark one time. But in classic passive-aggressive fashion, you loaded the question. In fact, you loaded it with the insult under discussion. You have all the tools now, should you care.

If you have a question, ask it after sanitizing it of “when did you stop beating your wife?”-class ambush. Otherwise, the conclusion is left as an exercise to the reader.

 

[ActionianJacksonian]

As I predicted: Humility is too painful for you. I wager there never was a question. Such are quickly recognizable in written English by the transposition of subject and verb.

Why would I take a wager when you reneg on a simple conversation?

 

[cannabineer]

Why would I take a wager when you reneg on a simple conversation?

*renege

true to form, another straw man.

 

[ActionianJacksonian]

Looking back, you deployed the question mark one time. But in classic passive-aggressive fashion, you loaded the question. In fact, you loaded it with the insult under discussion. You have all the tools now, should you care.

If you have a question, ask it after sanitizing it of “when did you stop beating your wife?”-class ambush. Otherwise, the conclusion is left as an exercise to the reader.

You conflated x with y, therefore I conceded x. It's pretty linear and straight forward especially since you introduced x and I y. Yet you, I assume a chemist or physicist pretend not to see it for reasons I can only assume. It's an exercise in futility as soon as you gave the first non response. Oh well.

 

[cannabineer]

You conflated x with y, therefore I conceded x. It's pretty linear and straight forward especially since you introduced x and I y. Yet you, I assume a chemist or physicist pretend not to see it for reasons I can only assume. It's an exercise in futility as soon as you gave the first non response. Oh well.

Not my problem. No comply, no advance.

 

[Roger A. Shrubber]

You ain't paying for sh*t. These are womens rights. The removal of basic personal rights between a woman and her dr is not sitting well with the majority of women, they may have poked a sleeping dragon.

there is no may about it, they woke that big bitch up, and she's not happy...i don't think she'll go back to sleep till the republicans are out, and so are their fucking trained liars on the supreme court

 

[ActionianJacksonian]

*renege

true to form, another straw man.

Another falsification

First, answer what you ignored last night.

And there is your "strawman". I obliged and you did not. So there is no monkey trap. This is the afterlife.

 

[cannabineer]

Another falsification

And there is your "strawman". I obliged and you did not. So there is no monkey trap. This is the afterlife.

You say you did, and yet it is not there. You are not good at this.

 

[ActionianJacksonian]

For Liz, a true Republican through and through. A true champion of The People except the ones in her state obviously.

 

[hanimmal]

For Liz, a true Republican through and through. A true champion of The People except the ones in her state obviously.

View attachment 5185246

This ranks right up there with your (or maybe another troll's it is hard to keep you apart when you show up in pairs over and over again) lie about how it wasnt under Trump that all those jobs in Wyoming's oil industry was lost.

 

[ActionianJacksonian]

This ranks right up there with your (or maybe another troll's it is hard to keep you apart when you show up in pairs over and over again) lie about how it wasnt under Trump that all those jobs in Wyoming's oil industry was lost.

Was that really the Wyoming voters concern though, or did you just insert that for them to suit your narrative? Have you sought the actual reason? I doesn't appear you have.

 

[hanimmal]

Was that really the Wyoming voters concern though, or did you just insert that for them to suit your narrative? Have you sought the actual reason? I doesn't appear you have.

The actual reason Trump's administration oversaw the job losses that you lied about in order to spread propaganda memes?

 

[ActionianJacksonian]

Dan Goldman, a true Conservative Ally

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1560033847588306944