It's there friend. Between that and what Sinclair Lab at Harvard has accomplished?- this is in our lifetime Canna..so is Ketamine Therapy, mushrooms we're doing it all now.
Examples of GOP Leadership
- Thread starter injinji
- Start date
You're in Texas and a man you should know the answer..admit it, they do it on purpose..the louder the better
Please don't tell me you do it too..I'm getting the feeling you do..don't you?
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
I hope genuine LSD gets brought back from the dead.
You know he could have surgery for those jowls.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
honestly i don't know, in the area of work i'm in yeah i've heard some loud ones, and being around the drag strips that lvl even goes higher......but i don't, i like the ability to listen to the radio as i'm drivingYou're in Texas and a man you should know the answer..admit it, they do it on purpose..the louder the better
Please don't tell me you do it too..I'm getting the feeling you do..don't you?
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
penis
Precisely. One thing I've noticed is not many lift kits up north..sofla was absolutely crazy..lift kits, neon lights, hydraulics on cars it's a lit like LA in that respect. CO not so much.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
oh you haven't seen the wanna be cowboy with the small penis vehicles then.......4wd, dsl, jack, neon, listening to rap.......
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Isaac Stanley-Becker: George Santos ‘client’ deeply enmeshed with US-sanctioned Russian billionaire
61,281 views Jan 17, 2023 #GOP #GeorgeSantos #Congress
Washington Post national political reporter Isaac Stanley-Becker and NBC News Capitol Hill Correspondent Ryan Nobles join Andrea Mitchell with his reporting on newly-discovered links between Congressman George Santos and the cousin of a Russian oligarch sanctioned by the United States. The cousin of Andrew Intrater, “whom George Santos has claimed as a client” is the cousin of Russian billionaire Viktor Vekselberg, Stanley-Becker explains. “As recently as 2018, when Mr. Vekselberg was sanctioned by the U.S., Mr. Intrater’s company confirmed that the Russian conglomerate was his largest client. So these are deeply enmeshed entities.”
Ohhh, I've seen them..they hate on black people yet emulate. Paradoxical.
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
no fucking idea...i've always thought it was a good idea to build sleepers...cars that go fast but look like grocery getters...i had a country squire station wagon with a 351 that wasn't quick out of the hole, but i'm not sure i ever hit the top end on that thing, know it would go 120...that's where i chicken out...telephone poles go by at one a second at 120...
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Seriously, I think Jack is gonna do the most to MAGA, and one way to do it would be to put republicans like Ron Johnson in prison! Give Trump lot's of company from congress too.
How about, MAGA Jack as a slogan? It's got a nice ring to it and a bit of literal truth.
Yep, blue hats with
MAGA
Jack
By cleaning out the magats and putting them and Trump in prison.
For sale upon Trump's indictment.
How about, MAGA Jack as a slogan? It's got a nice ring to it and a bit of literal truth.
Yep, blue hats with
MAGA
Jack
By cleaning out the magats and putting them and Trump in prison.
For sale upon Trump's indictment.
printer
Well-Known Member
Which department does the security checks? I would think some red flags might be appropriate.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Convict 45Seriously, I think Jack is gonna do the most to MAGA, and one way to do it would be to put republicans like Ron Johnson in prison! Give Trump lot's of company from congress too.
How about, MAGA Jack as a slogan? It's got a nice ring to it and a bit of literal truth.
Yep, blue hats with
MAGA
Jack
By cleaning out the magats and putting them and Trump in prison.
For sale upon Trump's indictment.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Let's talk about ledges, New Mexico, and a GOP candidate....
printer
Well-Known Member
Santos accused of taking $3K from GoFundMe for veteran’s dying dog
Two military veterans say that Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) stole thousands of dollars from a fundraiser for a dying dog in 2016, adding to the heap of bizarre falsehoods and tales about the embattled lawmaker’s past.
U.S. Navy veteran Richard Osthoff and retired police Sgt. Michael Boll told Patch.com Tuesday that Osthoff reached out to “Friends of Pets United,” an animal rescue organization that Santos claims to have founded, to get help for his service dog who was diagnosed with caner.
The men claim that a GoFundMe established through Friends of Pets United raised $3,000 to fund the dog’s lifesaving surgery. Then, according to the men, Santos closed the fundraiser and disappeared.
The dog, Sapphire, ultimately died in 2017. Osthoff said he had to panhandle to be able to afford the dog’s euthanasia and cremation.
“It was one of the most degrading things I ever had to do,” he told Patch.
The Patch story includes alleged texts between Osthoff and Santos, who was operating under the name “Anthony Devolder,” an alias Santos frequently used.
Santos denied the allegations to Semafor, saying he has “no clue who this is.”
A New York Times review in December called into question Santos’s biography and résumé, with the first-term Republican later admitting that he fabricated pieces of his work and education history.
Among his claims, Santos said that he founded and ran Friends of Pets United as a 501(c)(3) registered charity. The IRS couldn’t locate a charity by that name, the Times reported.
The news of the veterans’ allegations against Santos surfaced not long after Santos was named to two House committees. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have called for him to resign, but he has so far refused. He has also garnered the tepid support of some in Republican leadership, with Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) saying he would not ask Santos to step down.
“I try to stick by the Constitution. The voters elected him to serve. If there is a concern, and he has to go through the Ethics [Committee], let him move through that,” McCarthy said to The Hill, adding, “He will continue to serve.”
thehill.com
Of course they are ok with him serving. It just gives the rest of them a lower water mark that protects the rest of them from being asked to resign. Even Trump looks good (that might be a stretch though) compared to this guy.
Two military veterans say that Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) stole thousands of dollars from a fundraiser for a dying dog in 2016, adding to the heap of bizarre falsehoods and tales about the embattled lawmaker’s past.
U.S. Navy veteran Richard Osthoff and retired police Sgt. Michael Boll told Patch.com Tuesday that Osthoff reached out to “Friends of Pets United,” an animal rescue organization that Santos claims to have founded, to get help for his service dog who was diagnosed with caner.
The men claim that a GoFundMe established through Friends of Pets United raised $3,000 to fund the dog’s lifesaving surgery. Then, according to the men, Santos closed the fundraiser and disappeared.
The dog, Sapphire, ultimately died in 2017. Osthoff said he had to panhandle to be able to afford the dog’s euthanasia and cremation.
“It was one of the most degrading things I ever had to do,” he told Patch.
The Patch story includes alleged texts between Osthoff and Santos, who was operating under the name “Anthony Devolder,” an alias Santos frequently used.
Santos denied the allegations to Semafor, saying he has “no clue who this is.”
A New York Times review in December called into question Santos’s biography and résumé, with the first-term Republican later admitting that he fabricated pieces of his work and education history.
Among his claims, Santos said that he founded and ran Friends of Pets United as a 501(c)(3) registered charity. The IRS couldn’t locate a charity by that name, the Times reported.
The news of the veterans’ allegations against Santos surfaced not long after Santos was named to two House committees. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have called for him to resign, but he has so far refused. He has also garnered the tepid support of some in Republican leadership, with Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) saying he would not ask Santos to step down.
“I try to stick by the Constitution. The voters elected him to serve. If there is a concern, and he has to go through the Ethics [Committee], let him move through that,” McCarthy said to The Hill, adding, “He will continue to serve.”
Santos accused of taking $3K from GoFundMe for veteran’s dying dog
Two military veterans say that Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) stole thousands of dollars from a fundraiser for a dying dog in 2016, adding to the heap of bizarre falsehoods and tales about the embattl…
thehill.com
Of course they are ok with him serving. It just gives the rest of them a lower water mark that protects the rest of them from being asked to resign. Even Trump looks good (that might be a stretch though) compared to this guy.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
oh please let this be true....it would be the icing on the cake.......
printer
Well-Known Member
I can see it, with a little make up and a wig...
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
i can too...i saw the picture as well.......
did you catch the 9/11 one, bout how his mother died in one of the towers, but records show she was in Brazil at the time......
printer
Well-Known Member
Court rejects Republican push to end early voting in Arizona
An Arizona appeals court this week denied a GOP push to declare the state’s mail-in voting system in violation of the Arizona Constitution.
A three-judge panel affirmed a lower court’s ruling that mail-in voting does not violate the state constitution’s requirement to keep voters’ ballots secret, rejecting the arguments of the Arizona Republican Party.
“Arizona’s mail-in voting statutes ensure that voters fill out their ballot in a manner that does not disclose their vote and that voters’ choices are not later revealed,” the court ruled. “The superior court did not err in finding that these protections are sufficient to preserve secrecy in voting.”
Early voting has become commonplace in Arizona after state lawmakers in 1991 allowed voters to request early ballots for any reason. About 8 in 10 voters did so in the 2022 midterms, including those who mailed their ballot or delivered it to a dropbox.
But Arizona Republicans have increasingly attacked such methods, with the Grand Canyon State becoming an epicenter for voter fraud allegations promoted by allies of former President Trump following the 2020 presidential election.
The state GOP and Kelli Ward, the group’s chairwoman, began the legal push to block mail-in voting last year, prior to the midterms.
The party initially filed their case directly to the Arizona Supreme Court, but the court ruled in April that the lawsuit did not meet the criteria for being filed there and indicated it could instead be filed in a state trial court.
The trial court in June rejected a Democratic coalition’s arguments that the Arizona GOP did not have standing, meaning the capacity to file the suit, and that they were too late in filing their claims, but the judge ultimately denied the GOP’s arguments on the merits.
The Arizona GOP argued mail-in voting laws violate the state constitution’s Secrecy Clause, which states that “secrecy in voting shall be preserved,” because the laws do not create a restricted zone around a voter filling out a mail-in ballot.
But the appeals court panel noted that voters provide identifiable information only on the envelope containing their ballot, and the procedures are set up so that no election official is able to lawfully connect the choices on a ballot to the voter’s information on the accompanying envelope.
“These protections are adequate to ensure the preservation of secrecy in voting,” the appeals court ruled. “The legislature is free to adopt the more stringent requirements urged by Plaintiffs, but it is not constitutionally required to do so.”
thehill.com
An Arizona appeals court this week denied a GOP push to declare the state’s mail-in voting system in violation of the Arizona Constitution.
A three-judge panel affirmed a lower court’s ruling that mail-in voting does not violate the state constitution’s requirement to keep voters’ ballots secret, rejecting the arguments of the Arizona Republican Party.
“Arizona’s mail-in voting statutes ensure that voters fill out their ballot in a manner that does not disclose their vote and that voters’ choices are not later revealed,” the court ruled. “The superior court did not err in finding that these protections are sufficient to preserve secrecy in voting.”
Early voting has become commonplace in Arizona after state lawmakers in 1991 allowed voters to request early ballots for any reason. About 8 in 10 voters did so in the 2022 midterms, including those who mailed their ballot or delivered it to a dropbox.
But Arizona Republicans have increasingly attacked such methods, with the Grand Canyon State becoming an epicenter for voter fraud allegations promoted by allies of former President Trump following the 2020 presidential election.
The state GOP and Kelli Ward, the group’s chairwoman, began the legal push to block mail-in voting last year, prior to the midterms.
The party initially filed their case directly to the Arizona Supreme Court, but the court ruled in April that the lawsuit did not meet the criteria for being filed there and indicated it could instead be filed in a state trial court.
The trial court in June rejected a Democratic coalition’s arguments that the Arizona GOP did not have standing, meaning the capacity to file the suit, and that they were too late in filing their claims, but the judge ultimately denied the GOP’s arguments on the merits.
The Arizona GOP argued mail-in voting laws violate the state constitution’s Secrecy Clause, which states that “secrecy in voting shall be preserved,” because the laws do not create a restricted zone around a voter filling out a mail-in ballot.
But the appeals court panel noted that voters provide identifiable information only on the envelope containing their ballot, and the procedures are set up so that no election official is able to lawfully connect the choices on a ballot to the voter’s information on the accompanying envelope.
“These protections are adequate to ensure the preservation of secrecy in voting,” the appeals court ruled. “The legislature is free to adopt the more stringent requirements urged by Plaintiffs, but it is not constitutionally required to do so.”
Court rejects Republican push to end early voting in Arizona
An Arizona appeals court this week denied a GOP push to declare the state’s mail-in voting system in violation of the Arizona Constitution. A three-judge panel affirmed a lower court’s ruling that …
thehill.com