TRUMP CONVICTED

Onextremebuzz

Well-Known Member
You can't claim the same loss twice, either he lost the money, or his investors did, and when you take such a loss you claim it on your taxes and if both parties claim the same loss, then that is tax fraud by one of the parties. The investors had a legitimate claim, Trump did not.
He's not though, he files his loss then the investors file theirs. Both parties numbers have to add up and both will get a tax credit they can apply against future Capital gains. Tax laws are meant to benefit the wealthy and learning how to use the tax laws in your favor is an educational asset. So of course Donald would get the big chunk of it while all the other investors only get to credit for their individual loss while trump can write off the whole thing.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Generally when you give a company money to get going and it fails it's a loss on an investor, so know I am talking to someone who I now know never invested a day in his life. That's just how the tax laws work.
Contrary to claims that Bragg is charging Trump for no good reason other than "he hates him", Bragg took considerable political heat for shutting down the NY DA's investigation of Trump for tax fraud after he won the elected office of Manhattan NY District Attorney and was able to review the case. So, I don't know why this topic came up and why you are arguing irrelevant minutia over a case that both the Federal DA and the NY DA are convinced does not merit an investigation. How other people "feel" about it is also irrelevant.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
He's not though, he files his loss then the investors file theirs. Both parties numbers have to add up and both will get a tax credit they can apply against future Capital gains. Tax laws are meant to benefit the wealthy and learning how to use the tax laws in your favor is an educational asset. So of course Donald would get the big chunk of it while all the other investors only get to credit for their individual loss while trump can write off the whole thing.
Tell it to a tax judge!
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Trump confessed his motive to Hannity on TV, "They gave Nixon $18 million for what he had." So if Donald loaded up on Top secret docs, Uncle Sam would pay him a fortune for their return. Jenius!


Let's talk about whether NY is still the weakest case....
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
So convicted felons can run for office federally, but not state offices. They would likely change the DOJ guidance on prosecuting presidents during Joe's lame duck if he lost to these clowns. And trying to block Jack from convicting him of sedition if he is indicted before or after taking office would be fucking epic! Let's hope he loses his primary! :lol:
States can regulate who may run for US Congress. There are plenty of states that set a higher bar for running for Congress than the Constitution sets for President.

 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Here is Donald's motive and he confessed it to Hannity on TV "They gave Nixon $18 million for what he had" Donald probably thought if he loaded up on docs he could make a killing when the government wanted them back and only had a superficial understanding of the matter.

 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
He might not be on the ballot in some states, if felons can't vote, they can't be on the ballot and some of those states are RED! :lol:
Can you be a felon and run for President? Enquiring Minds Want To Know:wink:

Surprisingly, the answer is yes! If you are in a red state that prohibits felons voting, you wouldn't be able to vote for yourself.

We already know though this is another Jim Crow holdover to suppress those who already paid their debt to society.
 
Last edited:
Top