Iran Update...

[TheBrutalTruth]

have you forgotten about hezbollah's attacks into israel.and hams.both of these groups are backed by iran.and iranian agents have killed alot of our men in iraq and lebbanon .these ass holes have been sponsering terrorist attacks against the US and other nations for decades now.on top of that the country is run by complete idiots.they still stone people in that country.on to of that ademendenajad .damn what kind of name is that?oh well.
he is constantly threatening israel with complete destruction.iran is a huge danger to the world.

Proxy Wars do not make real wars.

 

[max420thc]

are the proxy dead not dead just the same?

 

[TheBrutalTruth]

have you forgotten about hezbollah's attacks into israel.and hams.both of these groups are backed by iran.and iranian agents have killed alot of our men in iraq and lebbanon .these ass holes have been sponsering terrorist attacks against the US and other nations for decades now.on top of that the country is run by complete idiots.they still stone people in that country.on to of that ademendenajad .damn what kind of name is that?oh well.
he is constantly threatening israel with complete destruction.iran is a huge danger to the world.

By that logic the United States is a large danger to the world for McCain's prancing around singing Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Iran.

Of course, personally, I do not see how that makes him a threat to the world. He is just one of many, but could not Iran state that since he is a representative elected by the citizens of the United States that we are a threat to their sovereignty.

 

[CrackerJax]

When they set it off, then we should take action. Until they actually commit the action they are not guilty of the action. What we should be doing is ensuring that we have a BMD system capable of destroying any such weapon.

Actions that the left has not allowed us to pursue, because they think it'll waste too much money. We could have easily accomplished the building of a high quality BMD (Ballistic Missile Defense) System if just 12.5% (1/8th) of the $800 Billion that the Obama Administration just wasted.

They have already broken several laws by enriching uranium. I don't condone the US attacking Iran , even if McCain was Pres. It's quite clear that Obama will retract us from the global scene, much to the dismay of the downtrodden.

The intention of my thread was never to condone violence against Iran, but to point out the growing threat they represent with their insane prophecy fulfillment desires.

Iran is not a stable country! It is a revolutionary state and needs to be treated as such.


out.

 

[TheBrutalTruth]

They have already broken several laws by enriching uranium. I don't condone the US attacking Iran , even if McCain was Pres. It's quite clear that Obama will retract us from the global scene, much to the dismay of the downtrodden.

The intention of my thread was never to condone violence against Iran, but to point out the growing threat they represent with their insane prophecy fulfillment desires.

Iran is not a stable country! It is a revolutionary state and needs to be treated as such.


out.

Unfortunately, as much as I wish I could predict the future, except for general trends (such as Obama destroying the United States), I can not. Otherwise I'd be winning the lottery every time it hit 100M or more.

As far as Iran. Yes, it could easily become a destabilizing factor in the Middle East, but taking pre-emptive action is irrational.

Which compares to the situation in Iraq, where our actions can be seen as going from a bunch of skirmishing to a full blown war. Which is vastly different from what any War against Iran would be.

 

[max420thc]

if i were pres TBT iran would have had their ass whooped in 1979.they have been a pain in the ass and are a terrorists state .
they have killed many americans.one would be too damn many as far as im concerned.they had terrorists within the borders of their country.they need to have their nuclear capacity destroyed.the sooner the better.
like i said again.if iran was wanting the nuke power for energy they would have accepted the UN deal to allow russia to run that nuke plant so none of the material could be used to develop a nuke.one nuke droped is too many nukes droped.
if you havnt noticed adiminadenijad he is fucking nuts.no thank you.he doesnt need a nuke.all they want it for is a bomb.
ive met several persians i like on line from time to time and i like them well enough.
they do not like their own government and would really like the USA to come and free them from the horrible opression they are under.
so im not for blowing up the population of that country.
just their ability to make a nuke.
i wouldnt have a problem one to send special forces into that country to try and assist those people in securing their freedom.
right now though being american.
i am worried about my own freedom

 

[CrackerJax]

Unfortunately, as much as I wish I could predict the future, except for general trends (such as Obama destroying the United States), I can not. Otherwise I'd be winning the lottery every time it hit 100M or more.

As far as Iran. Yes, it could easily become a destabilizing factor in the Middle East, but taking pre-emptive action is irrational.

Which compares to the situation in Iraq, where our actions can be seen as going from a bunch of skirmishing to a full blown war. Which is vastly different from what any War against Iran would be.

Yes, well as I stated in many earlier posts, it will be Israel which attacks Iran, not the US. They don't have the luxury of optimism towards a sworn enemy.


With all this going on, Obama plans on gutting our defenses. Holy Cow...
out.

 

[TheBrutalTruth]

if i were pres TBT iran would have had their ass whooped in 1979.they have been a pain in the ass and are a terrorists state .
they have killed many americans.one would be too damn many as far as im concerned.they had terrorists within the borders of their country.they need to have their nuclear capacity destroyed.the sooner the better.
like i said again.if iran was wanting the nuke power for energy they would have accepted the UN deal to allow russia to run that nuke plant so none of the material could be used to develop a nuke.one nuke droped is too many nukes droped.
if you havnt noticed adiminadenijad he is fucking nuts.no thank you.he doesnt need a nuke.all they want it for is a bomb.
ive met several persians i like on line from time to time and i like them well enough.
they do not like their own government and would really like the USA to come and free them from the horrible opression they are under.
so im not for blowing up the population of that country.
just their ability to make a nuke.
i wouldnt have a problem one to send special forces into that country to try and assist those people in securing their freedom.
right now though being american.
i am worried about my own freedom

Maybe they have a problem with turning something with in their borders over to the Russians.

Last time I checked I was advocating withdrawal from the UN, NAFTA, GATT, WTO and CAFTA due to the inherent conflicts of interest between the US, and maintaining our national sovereignty, and them. I can not exactly endorse allowing the UN to ride over Iran's sovereignty. It's hypocritical.

As far as Iran being a terrorist state. There's better ways to deal with it then handicapping our businesses by restricting their ability to trade goods there, and to import goods from there.

Though speaking of terrorists, how about Al Gore?

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54528

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]THE HEAT IS ON[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=+2]Gore's 'carbon offsets'
paid to firm he owns[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=+1]Critics say justification for energy-rich lifestyle serves as way for former VP to profit[/SIZE][/FONT]
[SIZE=-1]Posted: March 02, 2007
4:13 pm Eastern

[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1] © 2009 WorldNetDaily.com [/SIZE]

Al Gore's Nashville mansion (PajamasMedia.com) Al Gore defends his extraordinary personal energy usage by telling critics he maintains a "carbon neutral" lifestyle by buying "carbon offsets," but the company that receives his payments turns out to be partly owned and chaired by the former vice president himself. Gore has built a "green money-making machine capable of eventually generating billions of dollars for [COLOR=blue ! important][FONT=&quot][COLOR=blue ! important][FONT=&quot]investors[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR], including himself, but he set it up so that the average Joe can't afford to play on Gore's terms," writes blogger Dan Riehl.
Gore has described the lifestyle he and his wife Tipper live as "carbon neutral," meaning he tries to offset any energy usage, including plane flights and [COLOR=blue ! important][FONT=&quot][COLOR=blue ! important][FONT=&quot]car[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR] trips, by "purchasing verifiable reductions in CO2 elsewhere."
But it turns out he pays for his extra-large carbon footprint through Generation Investment Management, a London-based company with offices in Washington, D.C., for which he serves as chairman. The company was established to take financial advantage of new technologies and solutions related to combating "global warming," reports blogger Bill Hobbs.



Generation Investment Management's U.S. branch is headed by a former Gore staffer and fund-raiser, Peter S. Knight, who once was the target of probes by the Federal Election Commission and the Department of Justice.
Hobbs points out Gore stands to make a lot of money from his promotion of the alleged "global warming" threat, which is disputed by many mainstream scientists.
"In other words, he 'buys' his 'carbon offsets' from himself, through a transaction designed to boost his own investments and return a profit to himself," Hobbs writes. "To be blunt, Gore doesn't buy 'carbon offsets' through Generation Investment Management – he buys stocks."
As WND reported, Gore, whose film warning of a coming cataclysm due to man-made "global warming" won two Oscars, has a mansion in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville that consumes more electricity every month than the average American [COLOR=blue ! important][FONT=&quot][COLOR=blue ! important][FONT=&quot]household[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR] uses in an entire year, according to the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, citing data from the Nashville Electric Service.
The think tanks says since the release of Gore's film, the former presidential candidate's energy consumption has increased from an average of 16,200 kilowatt-hours per month in 2005, to 18,400 per month in 2006.

And all the other Global Warming Conspiracists?
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=2158072e-802a-23ad-45f0-274616db87e6

UN Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
December 10, 2008

Posted by Marc Morano – 9:36 AM ET - Marc_Morano@EPW.Senate.GOV

UN Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims​

Study: Half of warming due to Sun! –Sea Levels Fail to Rise? - Warming Fears in 'Dustbin of History'​

'No evidence for accelerated sea-level rise' ​

Link to Intro and full report:
Link to Full Printable PDF Report
POZNAN, Poland - The UN global warming conference currently underway in Poland is about to face a serious challenge from over 650 dissenting scientists from around the globe who are criticizing the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore. Set for release this week, a newly updated U.S. Senate Minority Report features the dissenting voices of over 650 international scientists, many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN. The report has added about 250 scientists (and growing) in 2008 to the over 400 scientists who spoke [FONT=times new roman,times]out in 2007. [FONT=times new roman,times]The over 650 dissenting scientists are more than 12 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers. [/FONT]
[/FONT] [FONT=times new roman,times]The U.S. Senate report is the latest evidence of the growing groundswell of scientific opposition rising to challenge the UN and Gore. Scientific meetings are now being dominated by a growing number of skeptical scientists. The prestigious International Geological Congress, dubbed the geologists' equivalent of the Olympic Games, was held in Norway in August 2008 and prominently featured the voices and views of scientists skeptical of man-made global warming fears. [See Full report Here: & See: Skeptical scientists overwhelm conference: '2/3 of presenters and question-askers were hostile to, even dismissive of, the UN IPCC' ] [/FONT]
Full Senate Report Set To Be Released in the Next 24 Hours – Stay Tuned…
[FONT=times new roman,times]A hint of what the upcoming report contains: [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever. [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.” [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist. [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet. [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA. [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.[/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review. [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?" - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden. [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.” - Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee. [/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.[/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.[/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.[/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman,times]“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata. # # [/FONT]
In addition, the report will feature new peer-reviewed scientific studies and analyses refuting man-made warming fears and a heavy dose of inconvenient climate developments. (See Below: Study: Half of warming due to Sun! –Sea Levels Fail to Rise? - Warming Fears in 'Dustbin of History')
The Senate Minority Report is an update of 2007’s blockbuster U.S. Senate Minority Report of over 400 dissenting scientists. See here: This new report will contain the names, quotes and analyses of literally hundreds of additional international scientists who publicly dissented from man-made climate fears in just 2008 alone. The chorus of scientific voices skeptical grow louder as a steady stream of peer-reviewed studies, analyses and real world data challenge the UN and former Vice President Al Gore's claims that the "science is settled" and there is a "consensus." The original 2007 U.S. Senate report is available here: Full Report Set To Be Released in the Next 24 Hours – Stay Tuned…
Meanwhile, while the UN climate conference is in session here in Poznan, the bad scientific news for promoters of man-made climate alarm just keeps rolling in. Below is a very small sampling of very inconvenient developments for Gore, the United Nations, and their promoters in the mainstream media. Peer-reviewed studies, analyses, and prominent scientists continue to speak out to refute climate fears. The data presented below is just from the past week. #
Peer-reviewed study: Half of recent warming was solar! - December 10, 2008 - Physicist Dr. Lubos Motl's Website
Excerpt: In this dose of peer-reviewed skeptical climatological literature, we follow Climate Research News. The blog was intrigued by a new article in Geophysical Research Letters that was accepted on Friday, December 5th. Eichler, A., S. Olivier, K. Henderson, A. Laube, J. Beer, T. Papina, H. W. Gäggeler, and M. Schwikowski: Temperature response in the Altai region lags solar forcing - Recall that the Siberian Altai Mountains are found at the intersection of Russia, China, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan. The authors looked at 750 years worth of the local ice core, especially the oxygen isotope. They claim to have found a very strong correlation between the concentration of this isotope (i.e. temperature) on one side and the known solar activity in the epoch 1250-1850. Their data seem to be precise enough to determine the lag, about 10-30 years. It takes some time for the climate to respond to the solar changes. It seems that they also have data to claim that the correlation gets less precise after 1850. They attribute the deviation to CO2 and by comparing the magnitude of the forcings, they conclude that "Our results are in agreement with studies based on NH temperature reconstructions [Scafetta et al., 2007] revealing that only up to approximately 50% of the observed global warming in the last 100 years can be explained by the Sun." Well, the word "only" is somewhat cute in comparison with the "mainstream" fashionable ideology. The IPCC said that they saw a 90% probability that "most" of the recent warming was man-made. The present paper would reduce this figure, 90%, to less than 50% because the Sun itself is responsible for 1/2 of the warming and not the whole 50% of the warming could have been caused by CO2 because there are other effects, too. Note that if 0.3 °C or 0.4 °C of warming in the 20th century was due to the increasing CO2 levels, the climate sensitivity is decisively smaller than 1 °C. At any rate, the expected 21st century warming due to CO2 would be another 0.3-0.4 °C, and this time, if the solar activity contributes with the opposite sign, these two effects could cancel. Even if you try to stretch these numbers a little bit - but not unrealistically - you have to become sure that the participants of the Poznan conference are lunatics.
Flashback: New scientific analysis shows Sun “could account for as much as 69% of the increase in Earth's average temperature” (LINK) & (LINK)
Dr. Bruce West, A U.S Army Chief Scientist, Says Sun, Not Man, Is Driving Climate Change – June 3, 2008 – (LINK)
21 spotless days and solar magnetic field still in a funk – Meteorologist Anthony Watts Excerpt: We are now at 21 days with no sunspots, it will be interesting to see if we reach a spotless 30 day period and then perhaps a spotless month of December.
New Arctic ice analysis reveals ‘No clear evidence of a delay in the start of the later summer/early fall freeze up or the start of the late winter/early spring melt’ – Excerpt: Based on analysis by William Chapman, author of The Cryosphere Today website, graciously prepared an analysis of the dates of the minimum and maximum Arctic sea ice coverage since 1979.
Oscillation Rules as the Pacific Cools – December 9, 2008 Excerpt: A cool wedge of lower-than-normal sea-surface heights continues to dominate the tropical Pacific, ringed by a horseshoe of warmer waters. The continuation of this long-term cool phase of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation stacks the odds against a wetter-than-average winter/spring in the southwestern United States. The latest image of sea-surface height measurements from the U.S./French Jason-1 oceanography satellite shows the Pacific Ocean remains locked in a strong, cool phase of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, a large, long-lived pattern of climate variability in the Pacific associated with a general cooling of Pacific waters. […] Sea-surface temperature satellite data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration mirror Jason sea-surface height measurements, clearly showing a cool Pacific Decadal Oscillation pattern, as seen at: http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/images/sst/sst.anom.gif . "This multi-year Pacific Decadal Oscillation 'cool' trend can cause La Niña-like impacts around the Pacific basin," said Bill Patzert, an oceanographer and climatologist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. […] This cool phase will likely persist this winter and, perhaps, beyond.
Report: Sea Level rise 'has stumbled since 2005' – Meteorologist Anthony Watts – December 5, 2008 Excerpt: We’ve been waiting for the UC web page to be updated with the most recent sea level data. It finally has been updated for 2008. It looks like the steady upward trend of sea level as measured by satellite has stumbled since 2005. The 60 day line in blue tells the story. From the University of Colorado web page: “Long-term mean sea level change is a variable of considerable interest in the studies of global climate change. The measurement of long-term changes in global mean sea level can provide an important corroboration of predictions by climate models of global warming. Long term sea level variations are primarily determined with two different methods.” - Yes, I would agree, it is indeed a variable of considerable interest. The question now is, how is it linked to global climate change (aka global warming) if CO2 continues to increase, and sea level does not?
Update: 'No evidence for accelerated sea-level rise' says Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute – December 12, 2008 Excerpt: In an op-ed piece in the December 11 issue of NRC/Handelsblad, Wilco Hazeleger, a senior scientist in the global climate research group at KNMI, writes: “In the past century the sea level has risen twenty centimeters. There is no evidence for accelerated sea-level rise. It is my opinion that there is no need for drastic measures. It is wise to adopt a flexible, step-by-step adaptation strategy. By all means, let us not respond precipitously.” Peer-Reviewed Study: Recent worldwide land warming' NOT 'a direct response to increasing greenhouse gases (GHGs) over land' - WorldClimateReport.com – December 3, 2008 ‘Rethinking Observed Warming?’ Key quote: “Evidence is presented that the recent worldwide land warming has occurred largely in response to a worldwide warming of the oceans rather than as a direct response to increasing greenhouse gases (GHGs) over land.”
Alert: 2008 will be coolest year of the decade!- December 5, 2008 Excerpt: This year is set to be the coolest since 2000, according to a preliminary estimate of global average temperature that is due to be released next week by the Met Office. The global average for 2008 should come in close to 14.3C, which is 0.14C below the average temperature for 2001-07. [Note: For evidence of the panic apparently gripping the promoters of man-made climate fear, read the quotes in the article from the warming partisans absolutely assuring everyone that cool temperatures are “absolutely not" evidence that global warming is on the wane. Those same voices are usually absent when it comes to linking heat waves to global warming. ]
Flashback: Global Cooling? - 'Thirty years of warmer temperatures go poof' - National Post – October 20, 2008
Report: NASA’s James Hansen "adjusts" a cooling trend into a warming trend - December 9, 2008 Excerpt: "[H]ere is what the data looks like before and after NASA GISS adjusts it. These are the USHCN “raw” and “homogenized” data plots from the GISTEMP website. The before and after is quite something to behold. ... What was down, is now up." "How not to measure temperature, part 79"
Geophysist: ‘It is time to file this theory in the dustbin of history’ – ‘Alarmists are in denial and running for cover'- Washington Times
By Geophysicist Dr. David Deming, associate professor of arts and sciences at the University of Oklahoma who has published numerous peer-reviewed research articles. Excerpt: Environmental extremists and global warming alarmists are in denial and running for cover. Their rationale for continuing a lost cause is that weather events in the short term are not necessarily related to long-term climatic trends. But these are the same people who screamed at us each year that ordinary weather events such as high temperatures or hurricanes were undeniable evidence of imminent doom. Now that global warming is over, politicians are finally ready to enact dubious solutions to a non-existent problem. […] To the extent global warming was ever valid, it is now officially over. It is time to file this theory in the dustbin of history, next to Aristotelean physics, Neptunism, the geocentric universe, phlogiston, and a plethora of other incorrect scientific theories, all of which had vocal and dogmatic supporters who cited incontrovertible evidence. Weather and climate change are natural processes beyond human control. To argue otherwise is to deny the factual evidence.
Climate Chancellor' No More – Der Spiegel Excerpt: Angela Merkel is facing withering criticism for remarks she made on Monday that seemed to back away from her earlier commitment to tackling climate change.
Alert: Under the Weather: Internal Report Says U.N. Climate Agency Rife With Bad Practices - Fox News – December 4, 2008
Excerpt: As more than 10,000 delegates and observers gather in Poznan, Poland, to discuss the next phase in the battle against "climate change," a U.N. agency at the center of that hoopla badly needs to do some in-house weather-proofing. […] But the WMO, the $80 million U.N. front-line agency in the climate change struggle, and the source for much of the world's information in the global atmosphere and water supply, has serious management problems of its own, despite its rapidly expanding global ambitions. The international agency has been sharply criticized by a U.N. inspection unit in a confidential report obtained by FOX News, for, among other things, haphazard budget practices, deeply flawed organizational procedures, and no effective oversight by the 188 nations that formally make up its membership and dole out its funds. The inspection was carried out by a member of the United Nations Joint Inspection Unit (JIU), a small, independent branch of the U.N. that reports to the General Assembly and is mandated to improve the organization's efficiency and coordination through its inspection process. […] WMO did not respond to a series of questions from FOX News regarding its future programs, sent on the eve of the Poznan meeting.
16-year-old suggests sheep dung can help save planet Card business has really dung good - Daily Post North WalesExcerpt: The company makes its products at the Twll Golau Papermill in Aberllefenni Slate Quarry using sustainable fuel and materials. Every sheet of paper is made from recycled materials, including sheep dung, waste paper and discarded rags, using processes designed to affect the natural environment as little as possible. […] Katie 16, from Tal-y-Bont, Conwy, was appointed to help spread the word on how Wales can reduce its carbon footprint and is urging other North Wales businesses to follow Creative Paper Wales’ example and adopt innovative approaches to the design and manufacture of products and the delivery of services.
Lord Christopher Monckton: 'Companies could be sued over climate change' Excerpt: The alarmist faction knows that, if it were to bring a case against a corporation whose executives were not minded merely to believe in the extremist presentation of "global warming" just because it is temporarily in fashion, they would lose. The case of Dimmock v. Secretaries of State for Education and for the Environment in the UK in 2007 was a very clear warning. The UK Government threw all of the resources of the taxpayer and of the Meteorological Office at the case, attempting to defend Al Gore's sci-fi comedy horror movie against the plaintiff's allegation that it was serially and seriously inaccurate. The Government failed and was humiliated. The judge, having heard both sides, said bluntly of Al Gore, and particularly of his unscientific allegation that sea level was about to rise by 20 feet, that "the Armageddon scenario that he depicts is not based on any scientific view". A few more judgments like that and the "global warming" fantasy would rapidly collapse. End of scare.
OOPS, We Forgot Siberia! (M4GW) [FONT=times new roman,times]- Weather Stations in Coldest parts No Longer Reporting[/FONT]
Excerpt: The thing that these skewed chart never take into account is that when the Soviet Union fell in 1990 the number of reporting weather stations went form a high of 15,000 in 1970 to 5,000 in 2000. This takes some of the coldest places on the planet out of the equation like Siberia. # #
Related Links:
UN Data shows ‘Warming has Stopped!’ – Climate Fears Called ‘Hogwash’ – ‘Global Carbon Tax’ Urged - December 3, 2008
‘Planet Has Cooled Since Bush Took Office’ & Global Warming Theory has ‘failed consistently and dramatically’ – November 20, 2008

 

[max420thc]

liberals are such pigs.this government is run like a mafia because of them

 

[******]

By that logic the United States is a large danger to the world for McCain's prancing around singing Bomb, Bomb, Bomb, Iran.

Of course, personally, I do not see how that makes him a threat to the world. He is just one of many, but could not Iran state that since he is a representative elected by the citizens of the United States that we are a threat to their sovereignty.

thats where he lost it

 

[PadawanBater]

if i were pres TBT iran would have had their ass whooped in 1979.they have been a pain in the ass and are a terrorists state .
they have killed many americans.one would be too damn many as far as im concerned.they had terrorists within the borders of their country.they need to have their nuclear capacity destroyed.the sooner the better.
like i said again.if iran was wanting the nuke power for energy they would have accepted the UN deal to allow russia to run that nuke plant so none of the material could be used to develop a nuke.one nuke droped is too many nukes droped.
if you havnt noticed adiminadenijad he is fucking nuts.no thank you.he doesnt need a nuke.all they want it for is a bomb.
ive met several persians i like on line from time to time and i like them well enough.
they do not like their own government and would really like the USA to come and free them from the horrible opression they are under.
so im not for blowing up the population of that country.
just their ability to make a nuke.
i wouldnt have a problem one to send special forces into that country to try and assist those people in securing their freedom.
right now though being american.
i am worried about my own freedom

Max, put up or shut up, when are you signing up for the military?

 

[CrackerJax]

One need not join the military to see problems. One need only follow the data and follow the money, at the juncture of the two is usually the truth.


out.

 

[PadawanBater]

Max, put up or shut up, when are you signing up for the military?

Natrone informed me you [Max] were in the military in the 80's, so disregard this post.

You should know the hardships of war better than most, any respectable soldier does not condone or advocate war, they know war should be the last result. It's pretty sad some soldiers havn't learned that...

 

[PadawanBater]

One need not join the military to see problems. One need only follow the data and follow the money, at the juncture of the two is usually the truth.


out.

I wasn't saying you need to join the military to see the problems, I was saying if you're advocating war and talking about sending more troops to an unstable region to fight an invisible enemy and possibly get killed, and you believe it's completely justified, like you and Max seem to, then you should be the first off the boat and the last ones to leave.

If you disagree with that statement then you're either a hypocrite of the worst degree or don't believe fighting is justified... which is it?

 

[jimthorpe215]

Invisible enemy you are a puss i took down 23 of these towlhead motherfuckers! have pic. of one with my boots in a hole in his chest fucked his tali ass up beeeitch !!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[jimthorpe215]

oh yeah dumb ass there is no getting off the boat its land locked you pussy

 

[CrackerJax]

I wasn't saying you need to join the military to see the problems, I was saying if you're advocating war and talking about sending more troops to an unstable region to fight an invisible enemy and possibly get killed, and you believe it's completely justified, like you and Max seem to, then you should be the first off the boat and the last ones to leave.

If you disagree with that statement then you're either a hypocrite of the worst degree or don't believe fighting is justified... which is it?

You misinterpret strength of conviction for advocacy of war. This is incorrect. Only by seeing the realities of your enemies intentions and responding with STRENGTH can war be averted. Diplomacy is always an option and should be the FIRST option. Only if there is a probability of success however.
Diplomacy has had ZERO effect with IRAN. Bush let the EU negotiate with IRAN for the last 5 years, and they came away with nothing. Iran came away with confidence and the time needed to carry out their awful plans of prophecy fulfillment.

After all of their lies and subtefuge you still wish to give them the benefit of the doubt? You should put a picture of Neville Chamberlain in your room as to remind you of the folly of that path.

I need no one to tell me of Irans intent other than the leaders of that country's own words. Or can you spin their words as well? They really don't mean it folks....right? lawdy...


out.

 

[jimthorpe215]

right on crackerjax i have fought in both would love to go back and slap those dressass talis and get some more seeds have some kush goin now the real ones

 

[CrackerJax]

It is Padawan and his ilk which produce wars. Go ahead, pull back, scale down, get passive...... heck wet ur pants while you're at it. See what that gets you......war.

You cannot control the oppositions intent. You can only prepare. We have stopped preparing.

I'm still waiting for Obama to visit the troops overseas. Someone needs to tell him he is Commander In Chief.


Kush seeds?

out.

 

[jimthorpe215]

yes i have the kush the real ones from the northern region