Hey, RT76 do you believe in love? Have you never seen it? herd it?...but I bet you felt it and can't explain how or why.
I can't prove if 'love' exists to anyone who hasn't felt it first hand.
What a tricky question....so I shall have some fun.
Do I believe in love... yes. Can I explain love on a non-spiritual level, yes.
Biological models of love tend to see it as a mammalian drive, similar to
hunger or
thirst;[
citation needed] psychology sees love as more of a social and cultural phenomenon. There are probably elements of truth in both views. Certainly love is influenced by
hormones (such as
oxytocin),
neurotrophins (such as
NGF), and
pheromones, and how people think and behave in love is influenced by their conceptions of love.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love#Chemical_basis
Studies have shown that falling in love physically is very similar to taking drugs.
http://www.healthtips.in/love-heart-body.asp
Those are just two research articles I found on the internet in less than 5 minutes. I have almost 300 pages of biomedical and psychological research concerning the biology, physiology, and psychology of love from my undergraduate years but I don't really feel like scanning them all.
The break down is that Love is MUCH like taking marijuana. There is a core biological reaction that occurs when presented with something attractive. The brain fires off various chemicals, including dopamine, which create a state of euphoria which we humans have named 'love.' The more intense the reaction to the stimulus the more intense the euphoria.
The activation of the canabid receptors in the brain has a very similar effect, in that they activate the release of chemicals in the brain, including dopamine. These chemicals create a euphoric feeling. The stronger the bud the stronger the high.
Love is a biological reaction to a suitable mate which insures perpetuation of the species. Creatures of far lower mental capabilities exhibit love reactions to proper mates as well. No magic, religion or hokus pokus in love.
So ya I think I can explain, experience, understand and believe in love since it has scientific data showing immediate effects of love on the human physiology.
As this relates to religion, I've looked and looked and found no external evidence that supports that what the bible says is 100% true. The tiny bits of evidence that have surfaced do not substantiate the bible, only the characters. It's KNOWN that Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem. Does that make him the son of god? Or is there a possibility that maybe in that day and age a unwed woman had intercourse, concieved a child, and to hide her shame from the community contrived an elaborate story about angels and God visiting and impregnating her?
Is it possible that Jesus had a decent upbringing and education that provided him with the ability to be an incredibly charismatic speaker with a good message? Does that make him the son of God? Not any more than John F. Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. or BaraK Obama. They were not the sons of God yet they have/had good messages and motivated millions.
Is it possible that 'faith healing' is nothing more than the practice of a combination of herbal medicine and will power? I would venture to say yes as I've seen people be 'cured' of cancer (in remission) from alternative treatments that are not AMA approved. Does that mean that these alternative medicines are 'false,' no it simply means science has not fully explained them yet. Do I rely on them as a cure all, nope because science hasn't fully explained them. Does it mean their Gods work, no again, just means that they've been figured out to work without knowledge of why.
The bottom line is that the 'evidence' of Christianity being 'true' is lack luster at best. There are MANY documents held in Rome by the Catholic Church that are not allowed to be released to the public. What do these writings contain? The 30 years of Jesus' life where he was a hellion maybe? Could they contain alternative theories of the resurrection? We don't know because the Catholic Church will not release them. I likely believe it is because they would lose a substantial portion of their power to the the truth that they won't let leak.
Remember reading the Bible is not reading what was originally written. Reading the bible is reading a story that was handed down almost a thousand years via ONLY word of mouth. Until the printing press was invented a vast amount of the biblical information that had been written down was already on interpretation 5 and 6 or more.
The bottom line of the Bible is this.
God owns and creates EVERYTHING. God then 'rules' everything via stone tablets burning bushes, prophets, and seers. That God is a bit of a dick. He strikes down whole cities because they practice a faith other than his. He removes peoples ability to communicate and creates racial inequity because of homosexuality. He murders the entire planets population save for Noah and his clan. Then he rapes a virgin and tells her via proxy he knocked her up.
Suddenly he's a daddy and becomes more and more calm. Now he's forgiving, loving and compassionate because now he's a daddy. His kid does some amazing works around the area. Provides people with faith. Teaches them kindness and compassion based on a set of acts of kindness. Since the kid speaks for dad everything the kid says is 'word of God.' The politico's of the time see the threat to their power and kill the infuriating bastard. Yet his followers faith is SO strong that he comes back from the dead (or at least a really deep coma) and talks to them before vanishing forever. (Begin book of Mormon here.)
A rather nifty story if you ask my opinion. It has no more validity than any other work of fiction ever written. I could find human analogs for every single character in any novel with a little research or a discussion with the author. Hell I'm a character in 2 comic books. The evidence that people love to trot out as 'proof' of Christianity is not tangible and is widely open to interpretation. Therefore I'm an agnostic. Yes I've read the bible, twice. I was disgusted by the old testament and found the new testament to be a bit fluffy for my taste. Good story, nothing more.
-RT76