Ron Paul is my pick (so far)

7xstall

7xstall

Well-Known Member
well, if you wonder why the mass media has only mentioned the Iowa straw polls briefly, and if you wonder why they have shown none of their tape of the event, you're not alone.

despite Romney's paying for bus loads of his "voters" (he actually bought their ballots and paid for their entire trip), every crowd shot i've seen has tons of Ron Paul signs, everywhere. the best part is that Ron Paul didn't have to buy voters, they went because they wanted to; they paid for their own expenses, bought their own tickets!

so why did he get only 9% of the final vote? what's going on with that voting machine malfunction and why is a member of Romney's "leadership team" overseeing the count? what about Romney's little joke about fixing the votes?

besides all that, it just seems incredible to me that a state with so many Christians would have voted so heavily for a mormon...

check out this article:

Evidence Suggests Ron Paul Was Cheated





.
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
7xstall said:
where are all the results of the exit polls? i can't find anything but this:
Vote In Sunshine: We The People Counted Our Votes "In The Sunshine!"

which clearly shows a win for R. Paul.

is it just me or does it seem weird that 12,000 tickets, costing $35 each, were never counted?





.
Click to expand...
Not that if the dem. front runners win, especially Hillarious, things will be much different. They are already back-peddling on stopping the war, so it's more of the insanity. The only real hope is Edwards- Kucinich or Paul.
 
ViRedd

ViRedd

New Member
medicineman said:
Not that if the dem. front runners win, especially Hillarious, things will be much different. They are already back-peddling on stopping the war, so it's more of the insanity. The only real hope is Edwards- Kucinich or Paul.
Click to expand...
And the reason they are backpeddling is because Petreaus's report to congress is due next month. Things have been improving quite nicely since the "surge" began. If the Democrats continue to say that we've lost the war in Iraq, they will look like the political fools they actually are when the report comes in.

Ron Paul cannot be given a voice for the very same reason Alan Keyes can't be given a voice. If either of these guys were elected, the jig would be up for the power brokers in Washington.

Vi
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
ViRedd said:
And the reason they are backpeddling is because Petreaus's report to congress is due next month. Things have been improving quite nicely since the "surge" began. If the Democrats continue to say that we've lost the war in Iraq, they will look like the political fools they actually are when the report comes in.

Ron Paul cannot be given a voice for the very same reason Alan Keyes can't be given a voice. If either of these guys were elected, the jig would be up for the power brokers in Washington.

Vi[/quote]And the 500+++ deaths by suicide bombers in Kurdistan, the very province you held up as an example of progress is what, success, ~LOL~, you are delusional. They've already said the report will be made by the white house, not Petreaus. Petreaus is saying we should start pulling troops out, do you think asshole bush will do that? NOT. The minute we pull the troops out, the violence will subside, there might be an immediate upsurge, but within a couple a months it will calm down. That's my "Emotional" assesment.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top