yeah i've been hearing that HPS is optimal for flowering but still works well for veg
No way cfl's are better than HID's for veg. Even if you had the equivalent wattage, the lumens from and HID destroy the lumens from flouros... that's why most of the growers on here use them. They are also more energy effiecient for the light you get.
I would say give the seedlings another few days to a week under the flouros. It won't do them any harm... but the big 400w could.
When you do move them I would start with the HPS at least 12" off the plant, maybe 24"... just start high, and lower slowly, if the plants start getting dry, crispy, or curling then the light is to hot on them, or just too much light for young plants.
I'm no expert but here's what I think about MH vs. HPS. HPS makes for strong, fat buds/ plants. MH makes for longer, lighter plants/ buds. People like MH for veg becuase it makes the plant grow well, giving you lots of bud sites. Using an HPS for veg will make all the branches thicker and stronger, less bud sites, but you could argue that the thicker branches and leaf stems you can get more nutrients to the buds during flower.
During 12/12 the HPS will make the buds fatter and weigh more, but the MH will make for tastier buds (if you ask me).
So go ahead and rock the HPS the whole grow... the biggest pain is that all your pictures will turn out orange.
Also, I am no expert grower or scientist... I'm sure someone's going to say I'm full of it. Oh well. I just wanted to tell you what I have found to be true for me and my friends and from reading a whole hell of a lot.
Good luck bro.
Is your 400w HPS aircooled?