The Beginning Of Martial Law In The USA

N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Ok so Guess what? Here is the beginning of martial law, newest executive orders.

ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America,including section 1822 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-181), and in order to strengthen further the partnership between the Federal Government and State governments to protect our Nation and its people and property,it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Council of Governors.
(a) There is established a Council of Governors (Council).The Council shall consist of 10 State Governors appointed by the President (Members), of whom no more than five shall be of the same political party. The term of service for each Member appointed to serve on the Council shall be 2 years, but a Member may be reappointed for additional terms.

(b) The President shall designate two Members, who shall not be members of the same political party, to serve as Co-Chairs of the Council.

Sec. 2. Functions. The Council shall meet at the call of the Secretary of Defense or the Co-Chairs of the Council to exchange views, information, or advice with the Secretary of Defense; the Secretary of Homeland Security; the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism; the Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement; the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs; the Commander,United States Northern Command; the Chief, National Guard Bureau; the Commandant of the Coast Guard; and other appropriate officials of the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, and appropriate officials of other executive departments or agencies as may be designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security.Such views, information, or advice shall concern:

(a) matters involving the National Guard of the various States;

(b) homeland defense;

(c) civil support;

(d) synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and

(e) other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.

Sec. 3. Administration.

(a) The Secretary of Defense shall designate an Executive Director to coordinate the work of the Council.

(b) Members shall serve without compensation for their work on the Council. However, Members shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law.

(c) Upon the joint request of the Co-Chairs of he Council, the Secretary of Defense shall, to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, provide the Council with administrative support,assignment or detail of personnel, and information as may be necessary for the performance of the Council's functions.

(d) The Council may establish subcommittees of the Council. These subcommittees shall consist exclusively of Members of the Council and any designated employees of a Member with authority to act on the Member's behalf, as appropriate to aid the Council in carrying out its functions under this order.

(e) The Council may establish a charter that is consistent with the terms of this order to refine further its purpose,scope, and objectives and to allocate duties, as appropriate,among members.

Sec. 4. Definitions. As used in this order:

(a) the term "State" has the meaning provided inparagraph (15) of section 2 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002(6 U.S.C. 101(15)); and

(b) the term "Governor" has the meaning provided in paragraph (5) of section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(5)).

Sec. 5. General Provisions.

(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair orotherwise affect:

(1) the authority granted by law to adepartment, agency, or the head thereof; or

(2) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary,administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.


BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,January 11, 2010. #
Click to expand...
Section D is particularly disturbing "synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States"

Says to me that the fed is now going to control all the state Nat Guard resources.

Federal Register link here: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-705.pdf

Also notice the very last part of the order, part c) his order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit,

Apparently executive orders can indeed create rights according to how that is worded. So in effect the government ( Pres) has deemed itself the giver of rights.
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
Uhhhhh,
This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

Pretty much says it all. The laws already exist, so all he is doing is coordinating the respective law enforcement agencies. Pretty much what one would want to happen in case of a terrorists attack. I realize that there are way too many laws, but there is a fair modicum of crazies out there also. When I see the soldiers blocking off streets, I'll know the time has come. Let me know when they start blocking off yours
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
medicineman said:
Uhhhhh,
This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

Pretty much says it all. The laws already exist, so all he is doing is coordinating the respective law enforcement agencies. Pretty much what one would want to happen in case of a terrorists attack. I realize that there are way too many laws, but there is a fair modicum of crazies out there also. When I see the soldiers blocking off streets, I'll know the time has come. Let me know when they start blocking off yours
Click to expand...
You mean to tell me there is already a Law that makes the federal government have authority over State Nat Guard units? Wow guess the 10th amendment does not exist.

It means that the order is given authority by laws already on the books. heh if it were law we wouldn't need an executive order now would we?
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
NoDrama said:
You mean to tell me there is already a Law that makes the federal government have authority over State Nat Guard units? Wow guess the 10th amendment does not exist.

It means that the order is given authority by laws already on the books. heh if it were law we wouldn't need an executive order now would we?
Click to expand...
Paranoid much???
 
qptyqpty

qptyqpty

Active Member
MY EDIT: I have to rescind my initial post, MM, sorry but after re-reading that sentence, NoDrama appears to be correct since this legaleze DOES include IMPLEMENTED. The order shall be IMPLEMENTED according to existing law. However, THIS --> (d) synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; Is in violation of the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. State and Federal military entities should NOT be working with each other, and could be used in violation of Posse Comitatus Act, if not already.

-------------------(Dont know how to strikeout)---

I would have to agree with MM on this one, I have already looked at the order, and though it worries me as a staging elements for NORCOM, including the increase in military activity and National Guard activity, I dont think this puzzle piece is cause for high alarm. I, however, have already begun scouting some of the land for sale in my area for good temp bugouts to do an advance drop and dig some shit in. I went to the store and got 500 more rounds of .45 (Aguila blegh, got to sort the shit -- better than my Sig choking on a Blazer) and 2500 7.62 Wolf HP (only stuff they had, I prefer FMJ.) Im waiting for my GTFO flag to pop, but it seems the shit that is happening these days that could be any time.

I expect no more than 2 years til the bottom completely falls out. Probably some type of violent revolt within 10 months, be it increase in hostility toward elite class and the elite poseur. Vandalism increase, robberies, energy costs jack up and cause people to go into overdrive. Theres so much trigger point activity going on its ridiculous.

Also, due to certain circumstances I have an iota more advanced knowledge.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Why would you need that order? Isn't the nat guard already being run well enough by the States themselves? Why do we need a whole nother committee just to synchronize national and state assets if thats already working the way it is? This is not about sending troops to Iraq or afghanistan, its about troop deployments INSIDE the USA. Or were you unable to decipher the meaning of IN THE UNITED STATES?
 
qptyqpty

qptyqpty

Active Member
Definitely not good, whatever it is for. We need less federal government. They know the resurrection of American values is coming, with bigtime retribution. Because after all, to the world, we are a bunch of rowdy, country-bumpkin, gun-slingin, dont-take-shit-from-nobody, ass-kicking motherfuckers. But we are cordial. It just takes some time.

Its always the quiet, shaky ones.
 
K

kayakook

Member
So I guess this means the next time there is a natural disaster (like katrina) the feds wont sit around for days with their thumbs in their asses (like they did during katrina)

Get a grip folks, as much as you want him to be Obama is not the antichrist
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
No, what it means is that just like in katrina, forces are going to go from home to home disarming the citizenry before any rescue efforts even begin. But this time it won't be local Guard units and the sheriff, this time its going to be regular US troops.

http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/current/in_our_opinion/Forcibly-Disarming-Law-Abiding-Americans-Disaster.html

http://www.claytoncramer.com/popular/EmergencyGunConfiscations.htm

http://gunlawsdontwork.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/the-truth-about-disarmament-why-guns-are-a-must/

http://feedlot.blogspot.com/2005/09/nra-responds-to-katrina-gun-grab.html


And you know something kook? I don't think its just Obama, this all started many Presidents ago. Dubya is more complicit in the usurpation of the USA than anyone.
 
K

kayakook

Member
Your second link warns of thousands of muslims performing terrorist "columbine" attacks every day.

your third link shows a picture of obama dressed as mao.

Just go ahead hide in your foxhole, the world will end soon I promise. Dont get impatient, just stay put in your foxhole.

stay in the foxhole, dont come out or else the govt. will get you.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
kayakook said:
Your second link warns of thousands of muslims performing terrorist "columbine" attacks every day.

your third link shows a picture of obama dressed as mao.

Just go ahead hide in your foxhole, the world will end soon I promise. Dont get impatient, just stay put in your foxhole.

stay in the foxhole, dont come out or else the govt. will get you.
Click to expand...
So you reject the claims by saying a pic of Mao ( Of which there isnt one, its in the 4th link) and someones speculation on the Muslim population in America somehow invalidates them? That's what we in the Politics section call a Logical Fallacy, look it up. Bring info to the argument to refute these claims IE Put up or shut up.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Some states may have language in their constitutions that preserve their sovereignity. This will get interesting to see which Governors have sack and which don't.
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
NoDrama said:
Ok so Guess what? Here is the beginning of martial law, newest executive orders.

Section D is particularly disturbing "synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States"

Says to me that the fed is now going to control all the state Nat Guard resources.

Federal Register link here: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-705.pdf

Also notice the very last part of the order, part c) his order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit,

Apparently executive orders can indeed create rights according to how that is worded. So in effect the government ( Pres) has deemed itself the giver of rights.
Click to expand...
if i remember correctly he mentioned it in the election. some nonsense about an inner security above the police or something.

guns and ammo guns and ammo yes i can yes i can.

if i see actual hiring of some sort of inbetween force, i am just gonna freak the fuck out. that would basically mean they are gonna take over within. scary times.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top