No offense bro, but thats kind of laughable. a 1000 watter loses its strength 4 fold for every foot away from plant matter it is. So the further away you get horizontally and vertically from the light. The less lumens they recieve. The suns light travels 93 million miles, so i don't think an extra five feet that the plant is tall makes much a difference. But growing indoor you can cut off the leaves that are 3 feet below the canopy cause they are going to draw more energy from the plant than they will recieve in artificial light energy.If youw ant to equal the light of the sun buy a 150 watt CFL. Want to blow it away 600-1000 wattHPS. I hope this hjelps!
No excuse necessary, in fact i'm glad you brought it up because I've heard contradicting opinions. They range from your lights won't reach leaves/branches 3 feet below a thick canopy. Also, heard your opinion. Also if a leaf is 50% dead, its lack of chlorophyll isn't enough to justify keeping it on the plant. My theory is. If my plants were out in the wild. The wind and rain would knock these dead p.o.s. leaves off anyway so its not like its un-natural. If you are correct, that lower branches gather enough light to carry their own weight. Why do people scrog and clip their branches 2 weeks into flower? I don't think anyone disagrees that leaves produce energy, but at what cost when growing indoor with 5 foot plants, Rosenthal's opinion in the book "ask ed" is that light will not penetrate through more than 3 feet of canopy. Perhaps you can help clear this up for me potpimp, this is one of things I've been going back and forth on.Please excuse me but I have to correct a myth: the plant uses it's leaves to *gather* - not piss away - energy and convert it into carbohydrates. Let me repeat it another way: you are cutting your production of bud and the overall health of the plant when you cut off leaves. The more leaves you have, the more bud the plant creates. Ask any master gardener and they will tell you that.