...but when talking density only leave weight out because of the increase volume of the fluff, all is equal anyway! when you compare your best dense 8th to my best fluffy 8th, we are talking about the same weight, in order to compare anything. as far as total yield i get more on fluffys because of the huge volume
wow!
please discuss volume with regard to taking a bag of dense nugs & breaking them up.
wouldn't it look the same as your fag fluff?
would it not store & package better?
actually, with dense nugs you get the best of both worlds.
you should be studying up.
you should make like sylvester stalone in rocky & hit the gym.
after all this time, with dozens upon dozens of detractors, you should have recongnized that achieving BAGS of fluff indicates poor "practice".
there's something wrong with your process. you are fucking up nature with your nurture.
it's not just me saying it, though i will prove it.
opinion is one thing, facts are another.
if you dish off bags of fluff like it's the bomb, then you are doing your clients a disservice.
entitled to your opinion, yes.
distorting reality while playing king o' the hill, no.
however, you
did say (
and argue relentlessly) blue hash & power kush were known fluffy genetics.
please let this thread die.
let's focus on a brand new chapter : your journal