sugar and molassis in your water?

[Medi 1]

i hate to ay it but you think those look better??..i see light fluffy buds and small to. and as i said quality isnt tested by a picture. but we do have the means to test that. i also see burnt tips on each one. and i can see stem through them buds, so not to dense are they..
we could post pics all day and not know what was betetr till you coughed up and had it tested as we do each week of its life. then we can compare whats good or not or if it helps orf not. a pic just tells camera skills.

 

[homebrewer]

i hate to ay it but you think those look better??..i see light fluffy buds and small to. and as i said quality isnt tested by a picture. but we do have the means to test that. i also see burnt tips on each one. and i can see stem through them buds, so not to dense are they..
we could post pics all day and not know what was betetr till you coughed up and had it tested as we do each week of its life. then we can compare whats good or not or if it helps orf not. a pic just tells camera skills.

Oh yeah man, you called it. These buds were light and fluffy and tested in a 1% THC. You've got quite the eye my friend . So how about those links or are you going to keep changing the subject?

 

[Medi 1]

links for hwat. i posted the info. read it. not all my shit is on google. no need to when we have our own guys that do these write ups. some are teaching at univercities for horticulture others are soil nbiologists and some bio chemists. are they not qualified enough???
the posts are probably pages back by now with you not believing and wanting to see pics and shit...lol, others seem to be seeing them as im getting thx rep every 10 min here. not that it means much but seems some see what i post and not here to just agrue their right or know more. i dont care if you dont believe. thats your call.


sory for the calling what i see on the pics but how does a pic show what the potency or qualoity of the smoke is..thats just stupid. like i said...test it and then well talk

 

[homebrewer]

Oh, so you wrote that in hopes of passing it off as fact? Well, I just hope the beginners around here fact-check your posts to avoid the same bad info that seems to get spread to each new crop of growers.

 

[Kerovan]

a picture dont show potency or how good anything is. we test weekly on our medz here to see what they need or have to much of and what the cannabinoid profile is...do you??? links???..you cant see post #35? or any of the others i posted?

and to ghetto guy. ya to much will kill them as it slows water uptake. its all posted in same post above

ill play along with the piuc thing, not sure how to tell whats better by a pic though. mine dont seem to have the potency button on it, or efficacy, just zoom and so on....lol

those look really nice. Is that their natural coloring or did you use a filter or different lighting?

 

[Medi 1]

jeez dood. ill run down to the store right away and buy a scanner for you so i can scan the documants i have on paper infront of me all for you. holly fak dood. get a life or somnething man, freekin troll id say. we dont pay for this shit to just post it out on the net. we use it for our copmany. and why would we waste all that money on usibng tis stuff in our foods if it did nothing for us. companies are in this tio make money not waste it on things that dont do as they claim.
im done. better shit to do than repost the same shit over and over for the slow at learning, i didnt write that info. just typed it or copied from my pc i have saved here.

 

[Medi 1]

nah..i did pic editiong for that pink shit. more proof a pic means shit

 

[Dahighone]

This got a bit off of sugar water and mollasis... Thanks for all the info

 

[stickybob]

good on ya