This should be correct. I don't believe glass is porous at all. The reason smells seep through bags and other materials is because of the pores. I always travel with my buds in a glass jar (one that seals airtight).
Glass is not a true solid. It is what's called a supercooled liquid, its molecules are always in flux. That's why glass in old houses is thicker at the bottom, the molecules are slowly moving downward.
So does that mean odor will eventually seep from the glass?
yes eventually. it will just take longer than a plastic bag. but the smell would prob escape from the rubber seal first.
Really dude?!? That's the advice you're going to give? How many people have dogs in the US? How many of those people smoke pot? Millions, that's how many. You don't think the dog trainers have taken that into consideration during the years of training that these dogs go through?
It means it is permeable to anything small enough, but I dont know if scent molecules are or not. Dogs smell nearly as good as we see. It informs their world almost equally. I don't think you can hide a scent in glass from dogs.
agreed but not all cops are very competent. check out more of those barry cooper videos i learned a lot from them. the best way to evade cops IMHO is to try to anticipate how they are gonna think. i think it is easier to fool the k9's handler than the dog.
wow relax bro go smoke a joint or something. its not about fooling the dog, its about fooling the handler. check out more of barry coopers videos. he was a k9 interdiction officer in texas for many years until he turned pot activist. check out what he has to say. maybe youll learn something.
Yeah, but the dog does the work. And when I said competent professional, I was talking about the dog.
yeah it is hard to fool a dog, thats why instead it is better to try and disrupt the communication between the handler and the dog.
Okay, now this is a prime example of taking everything you read with a grin of salt. Instead of just believing this, I immediately started researching it. And yes, my research is on the internet, but I look at many sites to get a consensus on a subject.
Okay, now this is a prime example of taking everything you read with a grin of salt. Instead of just believing this, I immediately started researching it. And yes, my research is on the internet, but I look at many sites to get a consensus on a subject.
I can find you references to glass as a supercooled liquid, but think what you will.
It's a legitimate controversy. It's been argued forever. They studied it for decades at Corning, and had to guess at their conclusions. Wasn't definitive.
Technically, yes, it is in a state of flux, but the flow rate is so incredibly slow that any noticeable movement takes millions of years. Plus, the idea that glass is thicker at the bottom of old windows is not true in the least. Glass is thicker around the entire edge of old windows for structural integrity because the technology wan't available to make them the way they are made today.
It's more than that, I mean there's more to it than that, but I'm done.Technically, yes, it is in a state of flux, but the flow rate is so incredibly slow that any noticeable movement takes millions of years. Plus, the idea that glass is thicker at the bottom of old windows is not true in the least. Glass is thicker around the entire edge of old windows for structural integrity because the technology wan't available to make them the way they are made today.
That's probably enough discussion about this as it is way off topic. As with any debate, it's up to the audience to conjure up their own opinions
Yep, you can was a soup can spotless. Sink it 6 plus feet deep in the ground and a bear can still detect the possibility of food below. Dont try and fool mother nature! lol
