Is Ron Paul dissing the young generation?

twostarhotel

Well-Known Member
There's some very wise words in the posts you young people have made in this thread. It really gives an old fart like me hope for the future. Do you all realize that by supporting Ron Paul, you are completely going against the liberal establishment, like the public schools, our universities, the main stream media and all other sources of establishment lies that have come from both left and right and foisted off on you as the truth? Good for you! :)

Vi
yes! im glad to hear its been a positive message for you or for anyone!
i hope in the next coming weeks or months people will see a new perspective in what is really going on
 

twostarhotel

Well-Known Member
I have to disagree- me personally, Ron Paul fits all of my views, every single one- I don't have to give one inch. =)

As far as the quote- I think what he meant was that the other candidates "monetary policies" are just like our tax codes- FUCKING THOUSANDS OF PAGES OF BULLSHIT TRYING TO EXPLAIN WHAT WE DO. lol.. Ron Paul's monetary policies are very cut and dry- and also backed my methods that actually have historical evidence of WORKING.. lol.. no other candidate can say that...
yay for the milf and genius picture
ron paul only speaks truth i wish people wernt so into talking and more into listening
 

ViRedd

New Member
yes! im glad to hear its been a positive message for you or for anyone!
i hope in the next coming weeks or months people will see a new perspective in what is really going on
Here's the deal ... Ron Paul's ideas are not new. They may be new to you ... but believe it or not, these ideas used to be taught in our public schools. Ron Paul's message isn't much different from that of the Founding Fathers ... and they got the ideas of liberty from John Locke. You would have loved my sixth grade teacher. That was in 1949. :)

John Locke (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Vi
 

twostarhotel

Well-Known Member
Here's the deal ... Ron Paul's ideas are not new. They may be new to you ... but believe it or not, these ideas used to be taught in our public schools. Ron Paul's message isn't much different from that of the Founding Fathers ... and they got the ideas of liberty from John Locke. You would have loved my sixth grade teacher. That was in 1949. :)

John Locke (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Vi
yeah for sure not saying the idea is new but when has it been challenged like it is today? well for us at least since were a new country. or like i said earlier thats why young people are diggin it because were the ones fresh out of school
 

closet.cult

New Member
Just thought I'd open this up for discussion. Read the last paragraph in this article.

Ron Paul: I'm the Republican who 'gets' young voters | The Social - CNET News.com

??? :-?:confused:
whatever. this is no diss. but the "journalist", whoever he is, wanted you to think it was.

truthfully, the economic issues paul raises are not complex. america has just been shielded from the truth for a long time. that inflation is entirely man-made. or i should say bank-made.

now that we, the young people know this, we will change this policy. we will kill the bank. if not with ron paul, then with someone else. the bank, with the help of the complacent u.s. government, is stealing the wealth of the middle and lower classes. (as if they dont have enough fucking money themselves!)

we will kill the bank. we have to. or we wake up homeless on the continant our forefathers conquored.
 

Gygax1974

Just some idiot
hey didn't this country start cause a bunch of rich guys didn't want to pay taxes. And I see what VI is saying he's right but to us younger people it is new, we have been brainwashed...we only learn what they teach us in school, you know? I like RP and think he's got no shot, but he may have changed the way things are going to go next election time. The next president is going to have it ROUGH.....the people want change they are tired of bullshit and phoney ass politicians
 

natmoon

Well-Known Member
I am English but i would vote for ron paul if i lived in your country.
On our tv screens it is being said that your whole country has been pushed into recession by Bush and has been for the past 3 months and that bush is trying to cover it up and keep it quiet somehow.
Is this fact/fiction broadcast in your country as well?
 

closet.cult

New Member
I am English but i would vote for ron paul if i lived in your country.
On our tv screens it is being said that your whole country has been pushed into recession by Bush and has been for the past 3 months and that bush is trying to cover it up and keep it quiet somehow.
Is this fact/fiction broadcast in your country as well?
Of course there is no mention of that here.

if you listen to bush's state of the union, the countrie's economy is doing fine, great, perfect. noone is happier and the war is a privaledge and a blessing to us and iraqis.
 

natmoon

Well-Known Member
Of course there is no mention of that here.

if you listen to bush's state of the union, the countrie's economy is doing fine, great, perfect. noone is happier and the war is a privaledge and a blessing to us and iraqis.
I was eating my breakfast and watching gmtv,breakfast news,and the financial part was talking of it.
The guy said that it had been going on for at least 3 months and that bush had done some thing with interest rates and banks to try to cover it up.
I just wondered if this also came under Americas gagging policy in times of war in case the public get angry with him or something.
To be honest i haven't a clue about all this stock and shares and financial crap but he clearly said that America was and had been sliding deeper into recession for the past 3 months and that it was being covered up:blsmoke:
 

Gygax1974

Just some idiot
We print too much money and the dollar goes to crap, gas rises, it all makes no sense...the problem with our media is they tend to be influenced one way or the other. meaning far left or far right, so either you hear we are in trouble or you hear we are fine, better than fine we're great. This guy has to go down as one of the worst presidents EVER. He was awesome at destroying businesses, looks like he did the same for the country. I'll tell you this Nat, I buy a bunch of seeds from the UK, and your pound has gone from 1.5 times greater to 2 times greater than the USD in no time at all...sad thing is most if not all oil contracts are valued at the dollar hence the increase in oil costs, there are other things that go along with this but they aren't really related to this conversation.
 

twostarhotel

Well-Known Member
I was eating my breakfast and watching gmtv,breakfast news,and the financial part was talking of it.
The guy said that it had been going on for at least 3 months and that bush had done some thing with interest rates and banks to try to cover it up.
I just wondered if this also came under Americas gagging policy in times of war in case the public get angry with him or something.
To be honest i haven't a clue about all this stock and shares and financial crap but he clearly said that America was and had been sliding deeper into recession for the past 3 months and that it was being covered up:blsmoke:
yeah bush is pushing a stimulus plan that will bring in (print out) 150 billion, a real quick temporary fix, it only puts us more in dept and will get people to buy a few more things because he knows people will, thanks white house for putting us in dept by another 150 billion with one signature
 

medicineman

New Member
It didn't start with Bush. If you guys want a good read on the issue, here it is:

The Revolution Was by Garet Garrett
So, it was the stinkin commies that brought us out of the great depression eh? I guess we ought to thank them then. We havent had to stand in bread lines since, although with the current government, it might become a reality again. We haven't had as many homeless since the great depression and with the great Sub-Prime debacle (Which I'd bet a pretty penny you were a big partner in), there are surely more to come.
 

natmoon

Well-Known Member
I watched on English tv a few weeks ago single mothers in Brooklyn and government projects having their children taken away from them as they could not pay for their homes to have water.
No water means the social services can come in and take their kids away.
In my country it is illegal to disconnect a home from a water supply as a basic human right no matter how much you may owe.

The narrator said it cost 300 dollars a week to look after each of her 4 children in the care system and that as she was now homeless she would also have to be put into a shelter at whatever that cost i dont remember so i cant quote that.
She owed the water company 500 dollars.

So because of a 500 dollar debt she now has no children,no home,has had her possessions repossessed and her children are motherless and fatherless and the kids are costing taxpayers 1200 dollars a week to look after them.
Seems like a bad business move to me with nothing but financial and emotional loss all around.
No wonder a lot of these kids grow up full of hate and anger:blsmoke:
 

mal_crane

Well-Known Member
It's illegal to disconnect the water in UK? I learn something new about foreign government everyday. I do have to say the way we do it here in the US is pretty pathetic IMO.
 

twostarhotel

Well-Known Member
I watched on English tv a few weeks ago single mothers in Brooklyn and government projects having their children taken away from them as they could not pay for their homes to have water.
No water means the social services can come in and take their kids away.
In my country it is illegal to disconnect a home from a water supply as a basic human right no matter how much you may owe.

The narrator said it cost 300 dollars a week to look after each of her 4 children in the care system and that as she was now homeless she would also have to be put into a shelter at whatever that cost i dont remember so i cant quote that.
She owed the water company 500 dollars.

So because of a 500 dollar debt she now has no children,no home,has had her possessions repossessed and her children are motherless and fatherless and the kids are costing taxpayers 1200 dollars a week to look after them.
Seems like a bad business move to me with nothing but financial and emotional loss all around.
No wonder a lot of these kids grow up full of hate and anger:blsmoke:
there he said it, i like your position on that, its all run by greed and the love to be on top and its all just a sick business. and the fact of the matter is its effecting people theyre conditioning people to be a certain way
 

medicineman

New Member
I watched on English tv a few weeks ago single mothers in Brooklyn and government projects having their children taken away from them as they could not pay for their homes to have water.
No water means the social services can come in and take their kids away.
In my country it is illegal to disconnect a home from a water supply as a basic human right no matter how much you may owe.

The narrator said it cost 300 dollars a week to look after each of her 4 children in the care system and that as she was now homeless she would also have to be put into a shelter at whatever that cost i dont remember so i cant quote that.
She owed the water company 500 dollars.

So because of a 500 dollar debt she now has no children,no home,has had her possessions repossessed and her children are motherless and fatherless and the kids are costing taxpayers 1200 dollars a week to look after them.
Seems like a bad business move to me with nothing but financial and emotional loss all around.
No wonder a lot of these kids grow up full of hate and anger:blsmoke:
You hit it right on the head. The private water company turned her water off, Instead of welfare paying her water bill and some help with her provisions, they take her children and it costs 4-6 times as much in the long run, isn't privatization wonderful. With munincipal water systems, the public owns the water companies and they can decide if someone needs help with their water bill, not some stockholder 500 miles away.
 
Top