What good would that do? Do you want your tax dollars wasted on projects that cant go forward now because they have been compromised?Hopefully all data is compromised and released on wikileaks
Given a choice, I would rather have the money stolen from me, against my will, back in my pocket.What good would that do? Do you want your tax dollars wasted on projects that cant go forward now because they have been compromised?
You are essentially championing waste and jeopardizing national security.
won't they just take more now to "enhance" their security?Given a choice, I would rather have the money stolen from me, against my will, back in my pocket.
Quite to the contrary, they will use this attack as an excuse to install internet kill switches and handlers that will scour the net shutting down all web sites that government deems as "Subversive".won't they just take more now to "enhance" their security?
The cry of the government at the feet of wikileaks. I guarantee our DoD has more information on the citizens of America, than it does on outside threats. It's not a war on terror, it's a war on America. It really only jeopardizes their investigations on us via the Patriot Act. Besides, haven't you noticed anytime our government finds something that al qaeda is planning against us they release it to the media? If they were so secretively trying to undermine these projects that would be secret. Case and point: the al qaeda tapes planning an attack on LA.What good would that do? Do you want your tax dollars wasted on projects that cant go forward now because they have been compromised?
You are essentially championing waste and jeopardizing national security.
edit:On average, according to the report, each installed wiretap intercepted the communications of 94 different people. In other words, the 2,119 installed wiretaps reported in 2007 intercepted the communications of nearly two hundred thousand people! https://ssd.eff.org/wire/govt/wiretap-statistics
This is supposed to be used to defend us against terrorists, not narcotics. Oh wait, according to Bush narcotics dealers are terrorists, or at least supporting them. Makes sense..."Roving" wiretap orders are especially powerful. Instead of being limited to particular phone lines or Internet accounts, these orders allow the police to tap any phone or computer that the suspect uses, even if it isn't specified in the order itself. In 2007, 21 roving wiretap orders were reported by state authorities, mostly in narcotics cases. The federal authorities didn't report any roving wiretaps, but that doesn't mean they didn't use them; the Department of Justice likely thinks all of its roving wiretaps were in cases too "sensitive" to warrant reporting.
Over 80% of all reported wiretap orders in 2007 were issued in drug investigations.
i should apply for this job.Quite to the contrary, they will use this attack as an excuse to install internet kill switches and handlers that will scour the net shutting down all web sites that government deems as "Subversive".
the trolls ate it.what happened to your avatar fdd?
that was funnythe trolls ate it.
I agree with you, because the real secret stuff is always on a closed network.that was funny
Several said it and are correct...These kinds of events are going to be used to police the internet. Think of it as a virtually untapped market for defense contractors themselves...Hell it wouldn't surprise me in the least if it was all staged to manufature a need for the specific market....Not like its never been done before h'uh???
Oh we'll just sit by and wait until it's too late and line up with the rest of the herd LOL