That's all about how you framed the argument. You put liberals and conservatives in the worst possible light and libertarians in the best. That's just a cheap trick. I can do the same thing.
Liberals believe in protecting the citizens of America ahead of multinational corporate profits. Libertarians believe in letting corporations control America and letting them exploit the American people.
No, it doesn't. Republicans might think you're socially too liberal, but fiscally you are waaaay to the right of republicans.
Socially, Libertarians are to the left of a lot of Democrats.
Financially, Libertarians are in the ball park with Republicans.
The libertarians might be right of the Neo-Con's in the republican party. Consequently, you realize the Neo-Cons are democrats who left the democrat party in recent history, right? They aren't actually Republicans, they just chose to change sides.
Neoconservatism in the United States is a branch of
American Conservatism that is most known for its advocacy of using American economic and military power to promote
liberal democracy in other countries. The movement emerged during the early 1970s among
Democrats who disagreed with the party's growing opposition to the
Vietnam War and had become skeptical of the
Great Society's welfare programs. Although neoconservatives generally endorse
free-market economics, they often believe cultural and moral issues to be more significant, and so have tended to be less thoroughgoing in opposition to government intervention in society than more traditionally conservative and
libertarian members of the
Republican Party.
[1][2]
