UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i know the difference and am purposely blurring the line. shame on me
The popularity of the Tea Party
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i think he is against the idea of treating welfare recipients like criminals and is intimating that these government folks trying to pass these laws must be on drugs.
except, i feel obligated to point out that his anger is a bit misguided, as obama did not pass this law, the tea partier rick scott did.
BendBrewer
Well-Known Member
Oh the irony. Isn't this a Marijuana Growing forum?
So, I choose to legally grow and take my own medication but if I am between jobs, I'm fucked. Because by choosing to grow and use my own medicine I am somehow a failure. How does someone with such a perverted view of life find his way to a forum like this? Strange.
Chad Sexington
Active Member
I should start up a urine screening company, seems business is good for them.
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
You said i posted youtube videos to speak for me.... haha heh lol
Johnnyorganic
Well-Known Member
Cannabis is not the only drug out there people.
Cannabis should be re-legalized. Then there would not be this point of contention.
I cannot say the same about OTHER drugs.
If someone CHOOSES to throw their life away on crystal meth, heroin, or cocaine; that's their business. But they should not expect public assistance.
And don't bother waving the threat of any starving children in my face.
A woman has the right to CHOOSE to kill those children before they are born. The Donks guarantee it.
Furthermore, if a mother CHOOSES to abuse hard drugs, she has little to zero regard for the welfare of her children in the first place.
Cannabis should be re-legalized. Then there would not be this point of contention.
I cannot say the same about OTHER drugs.
If someone CHOOSES to throw their life away on crystal meth, heroin, or cocaine; that's their business. But they should not expect public assistance.
And don't bother waving the threat of any starving children in my face.
A woman has the right to CHOOSE to kill those children before they are born. The Donks guarantee it.
Furthermore, if a mother CHOOSES to abuse hard drugs, she has little to zero regard for the welfare of her children in the first place.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
stop injecting common sense and start demonizing the tea party base don how it has been hijacked by wingnuts.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
protip: it does not get more original, clever, or witty the 8th time you post the same thing.
in fact, it makes you look like an unimaginative, irksome, blatherskite with a vocabulary and intellect small enough to rival the STD ridden toothpick you are likely wielding down there.
RyanTheRhino
Well-Known Member
hey now, im not against pot i am against the abuse of welfare. If you know the only thing holding you back from a job is a piss test then stop smoking. Even if its at McDonald's, yea i know its not glamorous but at least you have some income until u find a more suitable. job.
If you don't mind me asking, what illness do you "medicate" that you cant stop for a month?
tokingtiger
Well-Known Member
Untill they run as thier own party? They are Republicans and should be treated as republicans.. Middle class hating, in the pocket of oil / super rich, bought and paid for politicians..
At least Obama was elected by millions of small donations from the same middle class the republicans attack. All we hear is the attacks on unions for supporting Obama. WE the middle class also supported Obama and the Republicans, ( yes even if they pretend to be TeaParty or Libertarian), If they running as a Republican they ARE a Republican, are attacking us now and if your fooled AGAIN into voting for a party that even a couch locked 20 hit stoner can see that they DO NOT do anything good for smokers or middle class.. well you cant blame it on the weed, your just an idiot.
At least Obama was elected by millions of small donations from the same middle class the republicans attack. All we hear is the attacks on unions for supporting Obama. WE the middle class also supported Obama and the Republicans, ( yes even if they pretend to be TeaParty or Libertarian), If they running as a Republican they ARE a Republican, are attacking us now and if your fooled AGAIN into voting for a party that even a couch locked 20 hit stoner can see that they DO NOT do anything good for smokers or middle class.. well you cant blame it on the weed, your just an idiot.
Mr Neutron
Well-Known Member
BARACK OBAMA (D)
Top Contributors
This table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2008 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money came from the organization's PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.
Because of contribution limits, organizations that bundle together many individual contributions are often among the top donors to presidential candidates. These contributions can come from the organization's members or employees (and their families). The organization may support one candidate, or hedge its bets by supporting multiple candidates. Groups with national networks of donors - like EMILY's List and Club for Growth - make for particularly big bundlers.
University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557
National Amusements Inc $551,683
UBS AG $543,219
Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
IBM Corp $528,822
Columbia University $528,302
Morgan Stanley $514,881
General Electric $499,130
US Government $494,820
Latham & Watkins $493,835
copied from
BendBrewer
Well-Known Member
I wonder if Neutron understands that those are the totals of what their individual employees donated that listed the specific firm as their employer.
I bet he has no idea he just reinforced the other poster's point. From his own Cut and Paste job:
I bet he has no idea he just reinforced the other poster's point. From his own Cut and Paste job:
Mr Neutron
Well-Known Member
Bundling is controversial because it permits campaigns to skirt individual contribution limits of $2,500 in federal elections. Bundlers pool donations from fundraising networks and, as a result, “play an enormous role in determining the success of political campaigns,” according to government watchdog Public Citizen.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56993_Page2.html#ixzz1QfiBeZDN
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56993_Page2.html#ixzz1QfiBeZDN
Hey Psssst
Member
piles of crap with good hairdo's mostly......
PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1
Well-Known Member
The "Tea-bagger's",,,looks a lot like the 50's I don't wan't to hate,,, and love christian USA...BS,,, "Rock and and Roll MEN!!!"... only very un-dignified Loser's do shit like that! No chance "Obama 2012",,,again,,,Yea,,,maybe he won't be so nice this time!!! you Radiosized Big Bobble Head fool's....I Hate hater's so don't fuck with me! Fuck the Tea party,,,and Republican fools.
Ok chill out people........
Ok chill out people........