Thoughts go out to Norway and the ones lost.

Big P

Big P

Well-Known Member
If he was laughing like that on the police boat and i was on it, i would shoot him in the crotch and point and laugh at him
 
tet1953

tet1953

Well-Known Member
A quick search on this says that police officers in Norway are not typically armed, or do not carry firearms regularly. Instead the firearms are kept locked up until needed. Same for England and Iceland. That's just based on a quick read on the subject, I'm no expert :)
 
k0ijn

k0ijn

Scientia Cannabis
jeff f said:
Shot him with what? Norwegian policeman aren't armed
Click to expand...
How delusional are you?
Of course they are armed.

Police on duty carry a weapon, a pistol.
It's the same as in Sweden and Denmark.

They might not use the gun like americans do, but they do carry one.
 
k0ijn

k0ijn

Scientia Cannabis
tet1953 said:
A quick search on this says that police officers in Norway are not typically armed, or do not carry firearms regularly. Instead the firearms are kept locked up until needed. Same for England and Iceland. That's just based on a quick read on the subject, I'm no expert :)
Click to expand...
They don't carry machine guns in public (unless there is an emergency / high threath).
But they do carry pistols, on their hip.
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
k0ijn said:
How delusional are you?
Of course they are armed.

Police on duty carry a weapon, a pistol.
It's the same as in Sweden and Denmark.

They might not use the gun like americans do, but they do carry one.
Click to expand...
only as dilusional as the nytimes, wikipedia, and just about every news story covering the event.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/26/world/europe/26police.html

Whether Officer Berntsen tried to stop the gunman is still being debated. But facing a man carrying multiple guns and ample ammunition, there was little he could do. Like most other police officers here, he had no weapon

but hey, i had to read to the OPENING PARAGRAPH to find out the COP WITH NO GUN WAS ONE OF THE FIRST TO BE KILLED.

highly dilusional


 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
jeff f said:
only as dilusional as the nytimes, wikipedia, and just about every news story covering the event.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/26/world/europe/26police.html

Whether Officer Berntsen tried to stop the gunman is still being debated. But facing a man carrying multiple guns and ample ammunition, there was little he could do. Like most other police officers here, he had no weapon

but hey, i had to read to the OPENING PARAGRAPH to find out the COP WITH NO GUN WAS ONE OF THE FIRST TO BE KILLED.

highly dilusional
Click to expand...
you mean the off duty police officer with his son right?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/25/norway-attack-victim-saved-son
Trond Berntsen was working as an off-duty police officer on Utøya when Anders Behring Breivik arrived at the shore. Unarmed and unaware of the horror that was about to be unleashed on the island, Berntsen succeeded in protecting his 10-year-old son but could do nothing to save himself. The father-of-two became one of Breivik's first victims when he was shot dead within minutes.
Click to expand...
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
ginjawarrior said:
you mean the off duty police officer with his son right?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/25/norway-attack-victim-saved-son
Click to expand...
reading is fundamental. from the third paragragh

By law, Norwegian police officers must have authorization from their chief to gain access to a firearm, but they have rarely needed to ask, until recently. Violent crime has been steadily increasing, jolting a society used to leaving doors unlocked and children to play without fear. Coupled with growing criticism over the police’s slow response time to the attacks and confusion about the death toll, which was lowered Monday to 76 from 93, there are growing questions about whether the police are equipped to deal with the challenges.

dope
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
again he was off duty out with his son should he always carry a gun?

and im not sure why your trying to lecture on Norwegian policing your from a country where theres more than 6 times the violent crimes

perhaps the US should look more to their model instead
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
ginjawarrior said:
again he was off duty out with his son should he always carry a gun?

and im not sure why your trying to lecture on Norwegian policing your from a country where theres more than 6 times the violent crimes

perhaps the US should look more to their model instead
Click to expand...

no offense, but you are fucking stupid.

READ THE FUCKING PARAGRAPHS YOU DOPE. ITS AGAISNT THE FUCKING LAW TO CARRY EVEN IF YOU ARE LAW ENFORCEMENT UNLESS YOU GET PERMISSION AND MOST COPS DONT CARRY.

was that loud enough for you?

its not me saying knucklehead, its the reporter in oslo, the one writing the article, and the other one writing wiki, and the ones writing all the other news stories, and the ones putting it on every concievable network news from cnn, abc, cbs, et al, where they say the cops dont normally carry.

seriously, can we have an IQ test before letting dopes post on here?

further, you wanna police officer without a gun? then dont bitch when some fucktard shoots up an island full of kids.
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
ginjawarrior said:
again he was off duty out with his son should he always carry a gun?

and im not sure why your trying to lecture on Norwegian policing your from a country where theres more than 6 times the violent crimes

perhaps the US should look more to their model instead
Click to expand...
and another thing dopeywarrior, the article says norway is rethinking its policy due to more violence.

so in other words, THEY ARE GONNA START CARRYING CUZ THEY REALIZE HOW FUCKING STUPID IT IS IF THEY DONT.

model this,
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
jeff f said:
and another thing dopeywarrior, the article says norway is rethinking its policy due to more violence.

so in other words, THEY ARE GONNA START CARRYING CUZ THEY REALIZE HOW FUCKING STUPID IT IS IF THEY DONT.

model this,
Click to expand...

from what i've seen the norwegians are happy with their lower violence rate and less oppressive police force as they realize even that wouldnt have stopped this massacre happening
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
ginjawarrior said:
from what i've seen the norwegians are happy with their lower violence rate and less oppressive police force as they realize even that wouldnt have stopped this massacre happening
Click to expand...
honestly, you cant read can you? they are rethinking their policy. it says that....right in the article.....in paragraph 3....right in the paper.....the paragraph after the second paragragh....preceeding the 4th.....yep, just read it again....still says it....yep, they are still keeping the article up.....yep, not recanting paragraph 3....nope....not yet.....still says

THE NORWEGIANS (that would be the people of norway) ARE RETHINKING THEIR POLICY.....

generally when people are rethinking their policy, its an indication they arent "happy" with the results of their policy

holy fuck dude.....
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
The attacker identified himself as a Christian, conservative, anti-Islam nationalist. Although his methods fortunately were unique, his alarmist diagnosis of the threats of multiculturalism are more common, even in Norway, than we like to admit. However, instead of retaliating politically, legally or simply through moral finger-pointing towards groups and individuals harbouring these beliefs, the Norwegian government has retaliated with more democracy.
Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg has stated clearly that the terror will be met with more democracy and more openness. Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre has made clear that tomorrow's Norway will be fully recognisable. Not only have these phrases been repeated. They have been implemented. The city centre was quickly reopened. Norwegian politicians and the Royal Family have spent the last days meeting with large crowds of people, with limited security, always at a discreet distance.
Even more interesting, perhaps, there hasn't even been a public outcry for more security for the politicians to address. No opposition politicians, not even social media voices, have demanded more public security or pointed to the lack thereof as potential discouragements to the attacks. There has been no visible debate on gun laws or even on the sale of fertilizer, used by the attacker. Neither has there been calls for stricter legal punishment, Norway has 21 years as its maximum prison sentence. The limits to rhetoric in public debates have not been addressed. Norwegian terrorism expert Tore Bjørgo explained in an interview that more extensive computer surveillance could possibly have detected the attacker's plans. But quickly added: "Although this is obviously a level of monitoring the Norwegian people would not agree to."
Click to expand...
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/eirik-bergesen/norway-is-passing-the-tes_b_908008.html?ref=fb&src=sp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top