Court: Get state ID card before growing marijuana

Murfy

Well-Known Member
i was also grossly misinterpreting-

as an added note. every time patient is mentioned in the law, he is referred to as
registered qualifying patient or registered primary caregiver
.

int eh defense section it says
a patient and a patient's primary caregiver
repeatedly. i would say that makes for a clear distinction between the two. one is qualifying and registered. the other is not.
 

bob harris

Well-Known Member
i was also grossly misinterpreting-

as an added note. every time patient is mentioned in the law, he is referred to as.

int eh defense section it says repeatedly. i would say that makes for a clear distinction between the two. one is qualifying and registered. the other is not.
Don't see where that would play in...for the patient at all..it may leave a place for a REGISTERED caregiver to supply a non registered "qualifying patient" that hadn't applied yet, but I'd hate to be the guy telling the judge that it was ok to supply him because he told me he was in pain... The judge is going to say "so you think you can practice medicine too?" and send your butt to jail.

No way around it...they are forcing guys who grow quantity to be by definition..illegal...and that, my friend, can easily be considered "intent of the people" when the law was passed.

Now, after a painful wait, they will define how overages are graded and distributed...with themselves in the middle (kinda like liquor) and quantity growers will be able to make some money...so long as they can grow "med quality"..they'll pay taxes too, just like other business owners.

But for now, there are simply too many "abusers' out there for the State to ignore..just stay within the letter of the law..best ya can (we all know it's impossible to harvest 2.5 oz per patient per harvest when dry) but c'mon you can come close..stagger finish times..harvest 2 or 3 per week...whatever your patient load permits..but when ya have huge overages...don't try telling them it was a mistake...they ain't stoopid.

They are simply not chasing the legit people...they are chasing profiteers and idiots...Like having the plants outdoors..which started this thread. Regardless of affirmative defense,card timing, and any other circumstance...the idiot put them out doors in plain sight.and they were large enough to find with a HELI-FRICKIN-COPTER..that's blantent disregard, or stupidity...just the kind of thing they are looking for right now.
 

Murfy

Well-Known Member
there's that info-

good job JMP.
i already knew the specifics of the case. just wanted to see the work.

sorry jon. i simply cannot force myself to be a conformist.

nomatter the cause. it's been a fight the whole way. i smoked and grew through every bit of it.
and the constitution says i don't have too.
 

Capt. Stickyfingers

Well-Known Member
Someone I know was raided in Dec. of 08 before he applied for a card. Got his card AFTER being raided. He had 40 some odd plants and a shotgun in the house. He got Ed Czuprynski from Bay City as a lawer and got off with a misdemeanor possession charge and got all his equipment back from the raid minus the shotgun.
 

stumpjumper

Well-Known Member
I like how all of the news stations are reporting "You have to have your plastic card"... That's fine by me, get the god damn thing to me within 21 days of cashing my check and I'll accept that. Until then, I'll go by what the law says.
 

jonnynobody

Well-Known Member
90% of the news coverage on mmj is grossly biased to the point that it makes me wonder if the reporters are actually that incompetent or they know they're twisting their reporting to sensationalize a not so sensational topic. Gotta get ratings, right?
 
Top