so if we do not abide by your rules then we incompetent?
is see you are becoming fluent in the tactic of deflection.
If you don't follow the correct format that's already been well established through CENTURIES of work, CENTURIES man, longer than your Bible has been around, then you are susceptible to error. The scientific method provides us with the best known system to achieve correct results, and attempting to discern reality based on religious texts has proven to give us incorrect conclusions.
I'd like to see how you answer that question first, before I answer it.
No it isn't. Reality is not subject to your personal beliefs or preferences.
well, galileo and others if you want far back.
again, you display your ignorance. By the logic of your statement, you are saying that all ph.d's and professors who have contributed plenty to the fields that have helped you make up your own beliefs are fucking retarded.. well said sir, well said.
what scientific textbook or textbook for universities were written based on the bible? i forgot the time they made the bible part of the scientific method. that explains why you blame the bible on these incorrect conclusions.
wow, that is a pussy move. why cant you answer it? is it too much for your small brain to handle?
who is talking about reality? this is about knowledge. I really like the way you and heis are deflecting things now...
Personal beliefs have nothing to do with the shape of the moon. If everyone on earth believed the moon was square, it would still be round. This is the sort of thinking that suggests incompetence, rather than you breaking our nonexistent rules. The question of what knowledge is right or wrong, correct or incorrect, is what we are trying to explore.
The burden of proof falls to you. You claim belittlement, but fail to show it.
How does that apply to what I said?
You don't seem to fully understand the entire process. Peer review, fundamental to the scientific method, would eliminate any scientists with an alternate agenda. The only thing that matters in science is the truth. What isn't true gets weeded out in peer review, which is why it was introduced to the process.well, galileo and others if you want far back.
but closer to now, einstein was considered an idiot before a very famous physicist happened upon his theory..
forget names and im too stoned to properly recall it
but this is rather widely known,
see, make a theory and if it gets accepted, you are on easy street.
plus many people will now make a living around that theory..
which will make them actively fight against any theory disproving it.
which is not bad inofitself, only when they get dogmatic and overlook truth to protect their own status (a very monkey attribute)
that you do not know as much as you think.
I read that three times and I'm still not sure what you're trying to say...
Same issue with this man.. I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to say..
How do you know what is true and what is false? I use science, science has ways to quantify what is true and what isn't.
Seriously man, don't even pretend like you understand what that kid is talking about. You read the title of the video, thought "HOLY SHIT!" and came and posted it here thinking it supported what you're talking about.
you really need to look past the things that best suit your defense. it really makes you look foolish.
which is your own personal preference or interest. jeez, how many more times do i have to say that so you all can understand? you learns about things that help you with your discussion because you chose to learn about your defense, correct?
there is no burden on me, you all do the same, why cant i? Oh, i get, cause i believe in God.