reality checker
Member
I don't think they let you bring popcorn into the courtroom.
Where did it go and why...
- Thread starter NoGutsGrower
- Start date
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
And on that project the only people coming out of there were people from Arizona who wouldn't have had the opportunity to do previous snitching for the LA county sheriffs Dept and Bret Bogue who's already had previous snitching accusations in LA county!
You can ignore that all you want, but everyone else here sees right through that and there really isn't anything you can say that negates those facts. But really, everyone here knew Bret was a snitch the second Bret posted a complete denial of ever knowing the guy who was accusing him followed by the accuser proving he was doing business with Bret making Bret's denial a proven lie.
Even you must know Bret is a snitch at this point. It's pretty obvious. Why would you even want to defend this snitch? What if in the future Bret has an opportunity to snitch on you? Think he won't? lol. From my experience with him I think he acts like a strait up sociopath. Guys like that don't really give a fuck about you. They are just good at pretending they are. The second it's in his personal benefit to talk to the cops about you, he'll do it. If I were you I'd be less worried about what other people think of Bret and more worried about what Bret knows about YOU!
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
As it's been said, this isn't a court of law bitch. We've all seen enough here to be pretty damn sure Bret Bogue cooperates with the police. The most damning of all that we've seen are Bret's own actions.
And Bret, go ahead, threaten to sue me again. I want to hear you tell a judge that you're suing me for accusing you of cooperating with the police. In the mind of any judge cooperating with the police is a good thing, they'd laugh you out of court.
reality checker
Member
Is there a reason you calling me profane names? That' not very nice. You base your "conviction" of Bret because he denied working there in the beginning. All the evidence that is supposed to PROVE he is a snitch doesn't. Do you deny the timeline your friend posted? It doesn't fit, and you know it.
Again, where are all these documents from court with Bret's name as an informant? where are the court cases he testified in? They are nowhere, because it didn't happen.
I certainly hope Mr. Ekdahl doesn't have someone like you on his jury.
reality checker
Member
Why would people from Arizona be cultivating medicine in California? State law does not allow for that.
reality checker
Member
It is just as hilarious as believing a typed post of an accusation.Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!! I was thinking the EXACT SAME THING!!!!! lmfao!!!!!!! Couldn't have said it better myself.
reality checker
Member
How do we get in contact with the VP of norml? what is her name? and why were people from Arizona involved in a grow in cali?
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
You're still ignoring/denying key pieces of the picture. Like the fact that the court papers say this snitch has snitched before in LA county and everyone else there was from AZ so it really could only be Bret.
You ignore that because you know if you objectively look at everything, it's really fucking obvious that Bret snitched. I don't know the accuser outside of this thread nor do I know Bret outside of this forum. I have no stake in this what so ever. Same goes for just about everyone else here. We aren't out to get anyone, we only wanted to know the truth. Everyone who has no side in this and has looked at it objectively knows the truth here. Like I said, it's really obvious. You clearly have your own snitch protecting agenda. The proof in that is how you continue to ignore key pieces of info.
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
Uhoh! Better call the police right?
Dizzle Frost
Well-Known Member
snitches get stitches
reality checker
Member
1) The paperwork does not state everyone else was from Arizona.
2) you don't know if the poster's had hired any other consultants that were disgruntled prior to Bret being hired.
3) Until this accusation, Bret has never been accused of working for the LA county sheriff. The Rubin case dealt with an undercover officer who purchased $40 of pot 3 days prior to the raid (if you spent any time researching it you would know Rubin accused Bret of working for the CIA) If he had, don't you think there would be docuemntation of this?
You have taken what the poster said, and believed it only because of the initial denial of working with him. Like I have stated previously, I certainly hope Mr. Ekdahl doesn't get any one like you on his jury.
reality checker
Member
Just asking a question the DA is probably going to ask.
Matt Rize
Hashmaster
You're such a legal troll lol
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
You seem to be quite experienced in that.
Anyways, I don't have any specific knowledge of the situation so I have no idea what was going on there. Is that good enough officer?
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
Really dude?
Obviously you feel more comfortable in a court room situation, but this isn't a court room. In a court of law you may only have access to the information Bret Bogue gives you, but this is the interwebs. We can make up are minds using things besides court room evidence.
He was accused of being an informant in LA county before though.
Well when one person gives you a story that holds up and the other person keeps changing his story after his original story is proven to be a pack of lies, you tend to believe the guy who isn't constantly spewing out lies. Crazy right? I guess we should believe the guy who lies all the time instead.
Why do you think it is that all these people keep accusing Bret of acting shady in his own self interest all the time? Is the world out to get bret?
reality checker
Member
No. he was not. Mr. Rubin accused Bret of being a CIA agent. That's why I have to laugh at you bringing up Mr. Rubin's case as prior "proof".
reality checker
Member
where are all these people accusing Bret? Do you mean the people who are buying into Mr. ekdahl's story?
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
And what county was Mr Rubin in when the raid happened? LA county. He claims that Bret brought in 25 pounds and then as he left, the police came in through the same door. Now obviously Mr Rubin is speculating that Bret was snitching for the CIA, and while that might be his opinion, it's not necessarily a fact. But if you ignore the speculative aspects of that situation and look at the facts that all fits in with Bret's more recent accusations. And no, I don't believe Mr Rubin's speculations that Bret works for the CIA. That's his own theory he's obviously used his imagination to create. There is a difference between believing the speculations and believing what he saw. I do believe he saw what he saw.
What he saw was Bret show up with 25 pounds and then as he walks out, the cops bust in. For some reason the cops have no interest in Bret and his 25 pounds, but are interested in raiding the club. Now we have a second accusation in the same county where the court papers say the guy has snitched before.
In both cases the police have Bret on video tape doing things that they obviously consider illegal because they are raiding the places. And yes the police take no interest in Bret either time.
It's pretty clear what happened.