trayvan martin

C

cliffey501

Active Member
Carne Seca said:
Did you notice the story changing again. Zimmerman now says he maneuvered his head over to the grass (while he had a broken nose and being pummeled, once again where's the blood?) so Trayvon couldn't hurt him as much. At first it was "smashing his head into the pavement" and now it's "Oh I happened to move over to the grass." With his arms pinned under Travon's knees while straddling his chest. Arrest the son-of-a-bitch and let it go to trial already. WTF?
Click to expand...
When did "Zimmerman" say this?You sure it wasn't a gossip news reporter?
 
C

cliffey501

Active Member
UncleBuck said:
lawrence o'donnell confirmed it to be 34 minutes after the incident.

makes me think the "treatment" he received from the SFD was the administering of an aspirin.

i'm going to google the distance from the police station to the retreat at twin lakes and see what i get.
Click to expand...
Laurence o'donnell LOL how did he "confirm" this?
 
C

cliffey501

Active Member
UncleBuck said:


this is what his family is all over the news saying.
Click to expand...
You didn't answer my question if a 13 yr old kid walking his dog can't see him but Zimmerman could.You just said people outside walking their dogs can see for 37 miles.You also said how don't you see someone in a long corridor? so answer the question buck don't try to "play" smart.Why didn't the 13 yr old witness see trayvon? he seen zimmerman on the ground.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
it takes 14 or 15 minutes to get from the scene of the crime to the sanford police station.

that means only 20 minutes passed from the time the shot was fired to the time the car he was placed into left the scene.

so it took the SFD all of 10-15 minutes to "treat" zimmerman for a "broken nose" and "smashed, lacerated skull" (which zimmerman's brother claims he was one more smash away from being a vegetable for the rest of his life).

seems legit.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cliffey501 said:
You didn't answer my question if a 13 yr old kid walking his dog can't see him but Zimmerman could.You just said people outside walking their dogs can see for 37 miles.You also said how don't you see someone in a long corridor? so answer the question buck don't try to "play" smart.Why didn't the 13 yr old witness see trayvon? he seen zimmerman on the ground.
Click to expand...
you never answered my questions and i'm not about to listen to the tainted, coached account of a 13 year old eyewitness.

take your canard and blow it out your ass, right after answering my questions, that is.
 
R

redivider

Well-Known Member
the facts in the case are blurry but should be argued in court.

there's a 15 year old kid that's dead...

this law isn't perfect and it's time it's well defined in a court of law on a case by case basis.

i don't think the law's intent was to provide full immunity from prosecution... but that was the end result....

in the early 90s snoop dogg was involved in a similar incident.. blurry 'facts', and a dead victim.... he had his day in court and argued his case.... there was less evidence at that time suggesting he was guilty...

in this case we have evidence zimmerman stalked the kid and started the confrontation....

in this case the most important part to consider is if it is still self defense if you believe your life is in danger because of an altercation you yourself caused.... it should be decided by the court...
 
C

cliffey501

Active Member
redivider said:
the facts in the case are blurry but should be argued in court.

there's a 15 year old kid that's dead...

this law isn't perfect and it's time it's well defined in a court of law on a case by case basis.

i don't think the law's intent was to provide full immunity from prosecution... but that was the end result....

in the early 90s snoop dogg was involved in a similar incident.. blurry 'facts', and a dead victim.... he had his day in court and argued his case.... there was less evidence at that time suggesting he was guilty...

in this case we have evidence zimmerman stalked the kid and started the confrontation....

in this case the most important part to consider is if it is still self defense if you believe your life is in danger because of an altercation you yourself caused.... it should be decided by the court...
Click to expand...
Show me this "evidence" he started the "confrontation".
 
Carne Seca

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
(which zimmerman's brother claims he was one more smash away from being a vegetable for the rest of his life).

seems legit.
Click to expand...
I actually yelled at the t.v. when he said his brother was a smash away from wearing diapers for the rest of his life... AUGH!!!!''

This reminds me of the gay panic defense.
 
C

cliffey501

Active Member
UncleBuck said:
you never answered my questions and i'm not about to listen to the tainted, coached account of a 13 year old eyewitness.

take your canard and blow it out your ass, right after answering my questions, that is.
Click to expand...
He was supposed "coached" to say it wasn't self defense. Your lying and grasping at straws.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Carne Seca said:
I actually yelled at the t.v. when he said his brother was a smash away from wearing diapers for the rest of his life... AUGH!!!!
Click to expand...
and yet it only took the SFD a few minutes to "treat" him and he looked just fine 34 minutes later.

the family that lies together....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top