The Worst President In U.S. History.

Seamaiden

Well-Known Member
Yeah, but remember baby that the Europeans did their level best to set the stage for the Americans. The genocide of the American Indian began w/ the Europeans...Jackson just played it out to "End Game"...FDR imprisoned Americans and took their property in the name "National Security"...The fucker should've been shot IMO.
Without condoning FDR's actions, I disagree. Jackson did a hell of a lot worse than just play it to "end game". Restriction of freedom, stripping of property and forcing such a move under the conditions imposed by Roosevelt versus Jackson, Jackson takes that cake. The Indians already present on the land ultimately suffered a far worse fate.

Also, let's not paint all Europeans with the same brush here. The Spanish presence in the western states ultimately did not quite have the same effects as the Gold Rush influx of primarily Anglo-Germanic and northern Europeans did specifically upon California's Indian tribes. The Spanish had cohabitated with them relatively peacefully, and practiced absorption, whereas the Americans who came into California once gold was discovered went on active genocidal campaigns that were largely successful resulting in something like a full 80% or more of all remaining California Indians were obliterated within a few decades (there was a significant population decline with the Spanish conquest of these lands west of the Mississippi, though my own reading suggests that this could have been as much a function of known diseases as new ones), and with the majority of tribes practically wiped out. I, personally, see this as an extension of Jackson's policies. Nothing quite the same can be said of FDR's policies.

Honky. :razz:
 

VTXDave

Well-Known Member
Without condoning FDR's actions, I disagree. Jackson did a hell of a lot worse than just play it to "end game". Restriction of freedom, stripping of property and forcing such a move under the conditions imposed by Roosevelt versus Jackson, Jackson takes that cake. The Indians already present on the land ultimately suffered a far worse fate.

Also, let's not paint all Europeans with the same brush here. The Spanish presence in the western states ultimately did not quite have the same effects as the Gold Rush influx of primarily Anglo-Germanic and northern Europeans did specifically upon California's Indian tribes. The Spanish had cohabitated with them relatively peacefully, and practiced absorption, whereas the Americans who came into California once gold was discovered went on active genocidal campaigns that were largely successful resulting in something like a full 80% or more of all remaining California Indians were obliterated within a few decades (there was a significant population decline with the Spanish conquest of these lands west of the Mississippi, though my own reading suggests that this could have been as much a function of known diseases as new ones), and with the majority of tribes practically wiped out. I, personally, see this as an extension of Jackson's policies. Nothing quite the same can be said of FDR's policies.

Honky. :razz:
The Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas might think differently about the Spanish conquest of the Americas baby. You won't get an argument form me that Jackson was a genocidal, racist fucknut...but my vote still goes to FDR with Jackson taking 2nd and Lincoln following up in 3rd place.
 

Seamaiden

Well-Known Member
If the rest of these people could hear us here at home I think they'd just load up the bongs and sit back to enjoy the banter. ;)

The Aztecas, Mayans, and Inca all still exist as tribes, my sweet.
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
What with calling people baby, is that some sort of cultural thing. I had a boss that did it, I think he was from iceland or something
 

VTXDave

Well-Known Member
What with calling people baby, is that some sort of cultural thing. I had a boss that did it, I think he was from iceland or something
Seamaiden's my "Baby", my "Darlin"..."The Love of my Life"...She's my wife. It's a Term of Endearment.
 

VTXDave

Well-Known Member
Oh youre serious, I thought you were just some psycho!
:lol: Yeppers...In fact today is the 5th anniversary of when we first laid eyes on each other at the LA Airport as I was catching a flight to Indonesia. We saw each other for a total of 45 minutes....30 of which were taken in "consummating" the meeting. :shock: 8)

The 27th of this month is our actual wedding anniversary.
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
Wait Im confused, are you saying you got her in the sack in 15 minutes? Whatd yoo do it in the bathroom or something?
 

VTXDave

Well-Known Member
Wait Im confused, are you saying you got her in the sack in 15 minutes? Whatd yoo do it in the bathroom or something?
It was a 45 minute layover at LAX (she lived in LA and I flew in from SAC)and we spent that time in her minivan. <grin>

Ummm....This thread has certainly taken an interesting turn, has it not?...:lol:
 

Seamaiden

Well-Known Member
I think it's kinda romantic, myself. 8)
That she's my wife? Yes...In fact she dogged my ass for years to marry her until I said one day "Let's go the Vegas and get married baby!"...And we did!...:lol:
I didn't dog YOUR ass, YOU dogged MINE! :lol: It was, what.. not even two months we'd been talking when you simply "informed" me that you'd be making me a good husband and thought I should know. sheesh.
Wait Im confused, are you saying you got her in the sack in 15 minutes? Whatd yoo do it in the bathroom or something?
Yes, you're confused (the whole thing is confusing). He was at the airport, I lived nearby and drove out to meet him (in the minivan). 'Twas *I* who sacked HIM (I came prepared with black plastic bags to cover the windows). ;)
 
Top