Here's a link:
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/26/2714778/thousands-expected-at-trayvon.html Martin was 6'2". If you saw the recent pictures of him, you wouldn't call him a kid, believe me.
"Trayvon was not disciplined because of the discovery, but was instead suspended for graffiti, according to the report. School police impounded the jewelry and sent photos of the items to detectives at Miami-Dade police for further investigation.
A lawyer for the dead teens family acknowledged Trayvon had been suspended for graffiti, but said the family knew nothing about the jewelry and the screwdriver.
Its completely irrelevant to what happened Feb. 26, said attorney Benjamin Crump. They never heard this, and dont believe its true. If it were true, why wouldnt they call the parents? Why wasnt he arrested?
Trayvon, who was a junior at Dr. Michael M. Krop Senior High School, had never been arrested, police and the family have said."
^^ is not evidence of trayvon doing anything untoward that night
zimmerman himself on the 911 tape described him as being late teens so he couldnt have looked that old. i havent once denied that a 6'2" 17 yearold couldnt be dangerous if they wanted but the plain fact of the matter is 17 is still a kid.
If you're saying he's innocent until proven guilty, why do you not afford Zimmerman the same?
there is no evidence what so ever to say trayvon was doing anything wrong that night
zimmermans got a body to explain (however it happened)
The wounds to Zimmerman's head and face are ignored by you. The statements by witnesses who were there are ignored, while you give credence to his girlfriend, mother, father and their attorney, and then only with part of the fathers statements. None of them were there and they have no knowledge at all of what happened. You say "all the facts" but you're pickling and choosing what "facts" you'll consider. It appears you reached a conclusion that Zimmerman was a racist and Martin was a choirboy when the media was falsifying their reporting, and now ignore anything that does not agree with that judgement. The info you based your judgement on was false media hype, but you won't let go of it. You have prejudged Zimmerman (and Martin). Prejudge=prejudice Literal translation I see physical evidence of an assault on Zimmerman, I have to give that more credence than some of the witnesses, who, you will have to agree, sound vague, at best.
WOW big old paragraph accusing me of a whole bunch of stuff... erm how did you deduce all of that from the few posts that i have made in this thread i would love to see you quote me saying anything to do with that stuff
Martin towered over Zimmerman, how was he to know his age.
about his age check the 911 tapes zimmerman got it pretty much spot on
You (not you personally) pass off Martins known "incidents" as nothing, then one pops up and claims Zimmerman assaulted women and cops. Yeah? When? No response. You have two standards, if that isn't discrimination, what is?
somone posted something along the lines about they would perfer to have everything stolen than to have a dead kid on sidewalk. your response was to bring up trayvons "incidents" from school months to that (and this time it was me) i asked if it was cool beans to bring up zimmermans past
http://globalgrind.com/news/george-zimmerman-and-his-history-violence-sanford-florida-details
for someone trying to accuse other people prejudice you have appeared to judged me and my belief on this with a few post by me saying trayvon is a kid and there is no evidence that he did anything wrong at the point zimmerman started following. as i said earlier i think your projecting here a wee bit