That's why I said "It is logical to think that way". Like you said, a Xerox copy, of a copy, etc., etc. will deffinately degrade, no doubt! But a cutting of a plant is a continuation of the same plant, not a "copy". There is no "copying" of DNA, so there is no degradation - there is just a continuation of growing the same plant (in a different spot)!
I understand that there is a difference of opinion on this subject, but I wasn't aware that there was a real "Debate". It seems like a one sided argument; on the one side you have the people like me and the guy who has been growing the same "Plant" for 23 years - and on the other side you have people that say "It just don't seem right!". I'm really not trying to stir up an argument; it's just that I've never heard any explaination, or reason (that made any sense) why the DNA would degrade based on generations of cloning.