Gay marriage?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
You are comparing apples to oranges though. There is a fundamental difference between gay marriage, and bestiality and pedophile marriages and it's disingenuous to compare them. A more representative comparison would be that heterosexual couples can get married, so why not homosexual couples?
No, all im saying is that if one group of ppl deserve a certain right (this is gay ppls logic) as everyone else, then other ppl will have to have those rights as well, otherwise were gonna see a whole new movement of alternative "love" wanting to be accepted.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
Yes there is a genetic predisposition to alcoholism, but does that force their hand to grab a beer, and force their throat to swallow it? No! No matter what predisposition you have, its your choice to control that and act on it.
Alcoholics don't usually present until after they have been drinking for a while. Years in most cases. Once the addiction kicks in, it is no longer a matter of choice.

You are entitled to your prejudices, and I do not deny you them. I just don't understand.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
No, all im saying is that if one group of ppl deserve a certain right (this is gay ppls logic) as everyone else, then other ppl will have to have those rights as well, otherwise were gonna see a whole new movement of alternative "love" wanting to be accepted.
This is the "slippery slope" argument, one of the classical fallacies of logic. It's a reliable feature of doctrinaire "reasoning". cn
 

FresnoFarmer

Well-Known Member
It was used for effect and not as a representation of my personal view. I thought about adding a disclaimer stating that, but thought you guys would pick up on that. I don't care what skin color or sexual orientation anyone has.
you could have said "blacks" instead of "niggers".....I'm pretty sure some us RIU'ers find that quite offensive, used for effect or not.
 

guy incognito

Well-Known Member
No, all im saying is that if one group of ppl deserve a certain right (this is gay ppls logic) as everyone else, then other ppl will have to have those rights as well, otherwise were gonna see a whole new movement of alternative "love" wanting to be accepted.
You're a fucking lunatic. I still have to point out the fundamental difference between "one group of ppl" (gays [all consenting parties, not hurting anyone]) and "other ppl" (horse fuckers and pederasts [where there is someone getting hurt]). Do you seriously not see the difference?
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
This is the "slippery slope" argument, one of the classical fallacies of logic. It's a reliable feature of doctrinaire "reasoning". cn
The slippery slope argument has proven itself time and time again in history to be true, especially here in America where equality trumps reason and moral righteousness.
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
You're a fucking lunatic. I still have to point out the fundamental difference between "one group of ppl" (gays [all consenting parties, not hurting anyone]) and "other ppl" (horse fuckers and pederasts [where there is someone getting hurt]). Do you seriously not see the difference?
You still dont see what im saying do you? I AM NOT COMPARING GAYS TO HORSE FUCKERS OR PEDOPHILES.
 

guy incognito

Well-Known Member
you could have said "blacks" instead of "niggers".....I'm pretty sure some us RIU'ers find that quite offensive, used for effect or not.
Whether you like it or not that term was readily used in the days blacks had to ride in the back of the bus. The negative connotation associate with the word is exactly what I wanted to convey to demonstrate the similarities in the old popular opinion of racial prejudice and Kaendars appeal to current popular opinion about gays. It highlights the hatred that he is trying to hide. Anyone that gets offended by 6 letters, especially given my explanation of why it was used, can go fuck themselves.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Whether you like it or not that term was readily used in the days blacks had to ride in the back of the bus. The negative connotation associate with the word is exactly what I wanted to convey to demonstrate the similarities in the old popular opinion of racial prejudice and Kaendars appeal to current popular opinion about gays. It highlights the hatred that he is trying to hide. Anyone that gets offended by 6 letters, especially given my explanation of why it was used, can go fuck themselves.
some people just don't get the concept of using words sardonically.
 

guy incognito

Well-Known Member
I AM NOT COMPARING GAYS TO HORSE FUCKERS OR PEDOPHILES.


*Directly compares gays to horse fuckers and pedophiles*

[/kaendar meme]
 

Kaendar

Well-Known Member
Whether you like it or not that term was readily used in the days blacks had to ride in the back of the bus. The negative connotation associate with the word is exactly what I wanted to convey to demonstrate the similarities in the old popular opinion of racial prejudice and Kaendars appeal to current popular opinion about gays. It highlights the hatred that he is trying to hide. Anyone that gets offended by 6 letters, especially given my explanation of why it was used, can go fuck themselves.
Am I calling gays Faggots or anything derogatory or offensive? NO, because im not a hateful person and feel that all human beings (except white supremacists and child molesters) should be treated with respect no matter how they choose to live life.
 

guy incognito

Well-Known Member
Am I calling gays Faggots or anything derogatory or offensive? NO, because im not a hateful person and feel that all human beings (except white supremacists and child molesters) should be treated with respect no matter how they choose to live life.
That makes about as much sense as replacing "niggers" with "black people" in my statement, then claiming it's not hateful because I didn't use a hateful word.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top