eat cake, lose weight

[UncleBuck]

we're going to cut $5 trillion out of our revenues, but don't worry about the deficit.

we're going to add $2 trillion on top of that for the military, but don't worry about the deficit.

we're going to give you all the things you like about obamacare, but we're going to gut the provision that pays for it. don't worry about health care costs.

don't worry guys. eat cake, lose weight, look great.

also, let's fight medical cannabis tooth and nail. you guys are all cool with marinol, yes?

 

[abandonconflict]

Bull shit mountain is tall.

Stand tall on the soapbox and knock em all off the dope.

 

[FreedomWorks]

Nobody asked Obama to break down Romney's economic plan. His opinion is extremely bias. Economists are saying that Obama is full of shit, and that he doesn't know how to count. We already did a thread about this a couple hours ago Obama Drone. You're just repeating an idiot.

 

[UncleBuck]

Nobody asked Obama to break down Romney's economic plan. His opinion is extremely bias. Economists are saying that Obama is full of shit, and that he doesn't know how to count. We already did a thread about this a couple hours ago Obama Drone. You're just repeating an idiot.

well too bad. we did break down the plan. the math does not add up.

or maybe, you can name the specific deductions and loopholes romney had pledged to cut to balance it all out. go ahead, be specific.

eat cake lose weight feel great!

written in crayon to abet understanding.

 

[abandonconflict]

Typical mindless Republican. Can't defend Romney so assault Obama thread jack.

 

[londonfog]

Romneys fools only the fools

Romney math

2-2+4=0

 

[Carne Seca]

Nobody asked Obama to break down Romney's economic plan. His opinion is extremely bias. Economists are saying that Obama is full of shit, and that he doesn't know how to count. We already did a thread about this a couple hours ago Obama Drone. You're just repeating an idiot.

Are you fucking kidding me? All of America is asking for ANYONE to break down Romney's economic plan. Less than two months away from the Presidential elections and he's still blowing smoke up our asses.

 

[abandonconflict]

NEWS FLASH

Social welfare and safety net programs great jobs, stimulate demand and generate revenue.

 

[ginwilly]

guys, we are electing a president, not a dictator. He says what he wants to do and then works with congress and the senate to make it happen. Did Obama say anything specific in his campaign other than closing Gitmo and no lobbyists in his cabinet? No he said hope and change. Now that he admits he can't change anything he's running on forward hope.

Besides, it's not 5T in cuts it's 11T. And he's bringing back unicorns. He also said that racism will no longer exist if elected. FFS.

 

[UncleBuck]

guys, we are electing a president, not a dictator. He says what he wants to do and then works with congress and the senate to make it happen.

except that romney can't even say what he wants to do.

and his math does not add up.

eat cake, lose weight, feel great.

 

[ginwilly]

NEWS FLASH

Social welfare and safety net programs great jobs, stimulate demand and generate revenue.

According to actual numbers of money spent during this admin and GDP growth those programs are worth 20 cents on the dollar. In other words, using actual facts instead of Pelosi math, for every dollar they spend, it costs taxpayers almost 5. That's not really anything like you claim is it.

 

[abandonconflict]

guys, we are electing a president, not a dictator. He says what he wants to do and then works with congress and the senate to make it happen. Did Obama say anything specific in his campaign other than closing Gitmo and no lobbyists in his cabinet? No he said hope and change. Now that he admits he can't change anything he's running on forward hope.

Besides, it's not 5T in cuts it's 11T. And he's bringing back unicorns. He also said that racism will no longer exist if elected. FFS.

Deciphering from Jingoism to intelligible English...

"I can't defend Romney so I'll assault Obama while ignoring the slow improvements."

 

[ginwilly]

except that romney can't even say what he wants to do.

and his math does not add up.

eat cake, lose weight, feel great.

oops, here's the princeton economist Obama sites for those numbers you parrot.

I can’t tell exactly how the Obama campaign reached that characterization of my work. It might be that they assume that Governor Romney wants to keep the taxes from the Affordable Care Act in place, despite the fact that the Governor has called for its complete repeal. The main conclusion of my study is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same. That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.

you should probably start another thread saying the same thing, this one's ruined

 

[Harrekin]

NEWS FLASH

Social welfare and safety net programs great jobs, stimulate demand and generate revenue.

That's the most retarded thing Iv ever read. Simple equation.

Taxes - Administration cost = Welfare.

Therefore Welfare < Taxes.

There needs to be a safety net, but don't use retarded pie in the sky fail-theory to try say its a net positive to the "amoral" economy.

 

[ginwilly]

Deciphering from Jingoism to intelligible English...

"I can't defend Romney so I'll assault Obama while ignoring the slow improvements."

I can assault Romney too on many many issues. This one I can't though because I want a president who works with the other branches like intended, one who works with both parties because we are in the same boat in the same country. I don't agree with the tyranny of the majority, if you use this method you are a scumbag piece of shit who doesn't care about anyone who thinks differently than you. Just my opinion.

 

[UncleBuck]

oops, here's the princeton economist Obama sites for those numbers you parrot.

I can&#8217;t tell exactly how the Obama campaign reached that characterization of my work. It might be that they assume that Governor Romney wants to keep the taxes from the Affordable Care Act in place, despite the fact that the Governor has called for its complete repeal. The main conclusion of my study is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 about the same. That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.

you should probably start another thread saying the same thing, this one's ruined

oops, you spammed that again

too bad that no matter how many times you spam that, math is math.

cutting all rates by 20% adds up to $5 trillion in lost revenue.

there are not enough loopholes and deductions in the world to cover that without hurting the middle class.

so what is then required to make the numbers work? unrealistic growth projections.

not matter how many times your romney fellating self spams that incomplete misinformation, it still rtelies on unrealistic growth projections to balance out.

you should probably find a new candidate, this one's ruined.

 

[UncleBuck]

I can assault Romney too on many many issues. This one I can't though because I want a president who works with the other branches like intended, one who works with both parties because we are in the same boat in the same country. I don't agree with the tyranny of the majority, if you use this method you are a scumbag piece of shit who doesn't care about anyone who thinks differently than you. Just my opinion.

tyranny of the majority? ya mean, like putting minority rights to a majority vote, as romney helped fund in california and like his buddy chris christie wants to do in NJ?

better find a new candidate, you just spoke out against your own candidate again.

 

[ginwilly]

oops, you spammed that again

too bad that no matter how many times you spam that, math is math.

cutting all rates by 20% adds up to $5 trillion in lost revenue.

there are not enough loopholes and deductions in the world to cover that without hurting the middle class.

so what is then required to make the numbers work? unrealistic growth projections.

not matter how many times your romney fellating self spams that incomplete misinformation, it still rtelies on unrealistic growth projections to balance out.

you should probably find a new candidate, this one's ruined.

OK, since you seem to know more than anyone else but Obama, tell me what the impossible growth rate would have to be? 10%? 20%?

Obama predicted we'd have 4% growth during his term when he inherited "the worst economy since the great depression". He's fixed the bad economy now hasn't he? shouldn't we expect super growth now thanks to him? would 5% growth be too much to assume since Obama thought 4 was reasonable with an infinitely worse economy that he saved? Seems like 8% should be a goal as good of shape Obama has us in compared to Bush shouldn't it?

edit: can I ask a favor? I'm really curious what the rate would have to be because I haven't read it anywhere. You must surely know or you wouldn't have made this statement so could you answer this before starting another Romney is lying (even though the man Obama quoted says Obama lied about Romney lying, good stuff) thread?

 

[ginwilly]

tyranny of the majority? ya mean, like putting minority rights to a majority vote, as romney helped fund in california and like his buddy chris christie wants to do in NJ?

better find a new candidate, you just spoke out against your own candidate again.

let you in on a secret, I've found a better candidate already, Johnson has my vote.

But yes, that would be one example of tyranny of the majority, our health care plan would be another, looks like you are the one speaking out against your own candidate.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

oops, you spammed that again

too bad that no matter how many times you spam that, math is math.

cutting all rates by 20% adds up to $5 trillion in lost revenue.

there are not enough loopholes and deductions in the world to cover that without hurting the middle class.

so what is then required to make the numbers work? unrealistic growth projections.

not matter how many times your romney fellating self spams that incomplete misinformation, it still rtelies on unrealistic growth projections to balance out.

you should probably find a new candidate, this one's ruined.

3 questions:

1. Over what time frame is the $5 trillion lost?
2. Since Obama used unrealistic growth projections for EVERYTHING, why can't Romney?
3. Are you aware that Romney is leading even though they're still oversampling Dems by an average of 10%?