If they come for your guns, do you have a responsibility to fight?

[rooky1985]

I would sell back guns that the majority population deemed unecessary to own. All guns is to much to ask, I feel that would severely jeapordize the future of lawmaking and create a impracticall amount of power for our government.

 

[tripstick]

Those who would sacrifice their freedoms for security will enjoy neither.

 

[mr2shim]

Those who would sacrifice their freedoms for security will enjoy neither.

yep, this is and always will be the case. Just like fear is the easiest method to get people to give up their freedoms.

 

[UncleBuck]

Those who would sacrifice their freedoms for security will enjoy neither.

how many guns do you need to be secure?

 

[tripstick]

I hate the "man"!

 

[zambonic]

The majority does not rule in this country. We have a document that has strict guide lines our elected reps are to be following. Now we have a president that is talking executive order. Remember way back in 2007 a certain canidate that was putting Bush down for using executive orders.

I would sell back guns that the majority population deemed unecessary to own. All guns is to much to ask, I feel that would severely jeapordize the future of lawmaking and create a impracticall amount of power for our government.

 

[UncleBuck]

I hate the "man"!

who's the man?

or can you only speak in vague generalities?

 

[tripstick]

The whole reason of the 2nd Admendment is to protect us from the peole who would seek to see us protected.

 

[UncleBuck]

The majority does not rule in this country. We have a document that has strict guide lines our elected reps are to be following. Now we have a president that is talking executive order. Remember way back in 2007 a certain canidate that was putting Bush down for using executive orders.

*guidelines
*candidate

 

[UncleBuck]

The whole reason of the 2nd Admendment is to protect us from the peole who would seek to see us protected.

that's a reason, not the reason and certainly not the whole reason.

edit: and since we're not talking muskets and cannon balls anymore, it's the most outdated by far.

 

[tripstick]

I guess that's why they call us a Republic?

 

[tripstick]

No, we're talking armed militia entering your grow.

 

[cannabineer]

that's a reason, not the reason and certainly not the whole reason.

edit: and since we're not talking muskets and cannon balls anymore, it's the most outdated by far.

My question is, can you show where the Second was limited to weapons of the time? I read it as being "open" to the indefinite future.

 

[rooky1985]

how many guns do you need to be secure?

I think that all depends on who you are, where you are, and what you have been doing LOL. But seriously if more anti-gun enthusiast would promote other options varying from "give us all your guns", the gun enthusiast would find there arguments more relevant. I don't think assault weapons will be banned (to many gun enthusiast on capitol hill) but, I believe they will focus efforts on banning high capacity mags.

 

[rooky1985]

The majority does not rule in this country. We have a document that has strict guide lines our elected reps are to be following. Now we have a president that is talking executive order. Remember way back in 2007 a certain canidate that was putting Bush down for using executive orders.

I understand that is just what I would require to relinquish certain firearms that I own.

 

[UncleBuck]

I think that all depends on who you are, where you are, and what you have been doing LOL. But seriously if more anti-gun enthusiast would promote other options varying from "give us all your guns", the gun enthusiast would find there arguments more relevant. I don't think assault weapons will be banned (to many gun enthusiast on capitol hill) but, I believe they will focus efforts on banning high capacity mags.

name one person in power proposing "give us all your guns".

you're being irrational, delusional, and paranoid. the mark of most gun nuts.

 

[UncleBuck]

My question is, can you show where the Second was limited to weapons of the time? I read it as being "open" to the indefinite future.

they gave us the reason for arms: to protect the security of a free state. pretty sure they were talking about keeping king george off our backs.

we have a standing army now.

 

[zambonic]

And may I ask what "to protect the security of a free state" means to a person such as yourself?

they gave us the reason for arms: to protect the security of a free state. pretty sure they were talking about keeping king george off our backs.

we have a standing army now.

 

[fb360]

you suffering delusions? someone coming to take your guns, white supremacist guy?

Apparently you don't understand the single syllable, 2 letter, basic word, "if".

Black supremacist guy?

 

[UncleBuck]

And may I ask what "to protect the security of a free state" means to a person such as yourself?

keeping king george and hitler out.

like i said, we have a standing army for that now.