Eraserhead
Well-Known Member
We do not use any paste for heat transfer, we use Berquist thermal pads. With finned aluminum heat sinks and aluminum circuit boards, and 120mm ball bearing fans rated for 19dba and 73cfm, they aren't cheap.
Of course the 250w model is old tech, they are from late 2011. Which is why we're releasing a new light that is the latest tech.
Just because 2 lights look the same, does not mean they are. Especially with the Chinese copying things that were already copied, which is probably still a copy.
Of course the 250w model is old tech, they are from late 2011. Which is why we're releasing a new light that is the latest tech.
Just because 2 lights look the same, does not mean they are. Especially with the Chinese copying things that were already copied, which is probably still a copy.
One more point is how bad those things are made to take apart?, strip one to find out. Loads of Allen keys holding the modules and front plate on. Then you take the cover plate off from the LED and all the lenses fallout. Then there is the ABSOLUTELY terrible heat transfer paste, poor china Taiwan etc.. cant match us for Heat transfer solutions. Apart from all that, they aint bad lights to test, heres a pic of mine to prove im right......plus I added my own two spectrum modules in the middle, pure 660nm. Worked a treat, accelerated the one on the left to finish loads faster then was expected, so sorry mate, your lights aren't new tech.....ive had these ones a year now and they were the first,. Before Craplys (sorry) Cidlys Appollo range, and yes all the insides of that unit is patented by its inventor so no copying, naughty naughty, they work but still a nightmare to strip.